by brendywendy » 03 Nov 2010 14:03
by Wycombe Royal » 03 Nov 2010 14:14
Snowball I discuss football, Hoop.
I just don't make unsupported guestimates
by brendywendy » 03 Nov 2010 14:32
by cmonurz » 03 Nov 2010 16:39
by Svlad Cjelli » 03 Nov 2010 17:22
cmonurz Has Snowball been warned off, or did his keyboard explode?
by Gav » 03 Nov 2010 17:32
Svlad Cjellicmonurz Has Snowball been warned off, or did his keyboard explode?
Let's hope so - he's single-handedly made "The Team" board unvisitable.
by brendywendy » 03 Nov 2010 17:51
by Stranded » 03 Nov 2010 17:55
brendywendy not singlehandedly- was only all the bites and responses that got the post rate up.
by Snowball » 03 Nov 2010 18:53
cmonurz Has Snowball been warned off, or did his keyboard explode?
by under the tin » 03 Nov 2010 19:50
by Ian Royal » 03 Nov 2010 22:32
Hoop BlahWycombe Royal ....this forum no longer seems to be about RFC, it is just about meaningless stats and arguments about them.
This forum has gone down the pan big time and I think Graham or the mods need to do something about it before it ruins it for good.
I agree totally with this.
I'd like to ignore snowball, but he's getting very difficult to ignore through the volume and make up of his posts, and the generally rubbish that fill them up. To an extent I think he needs to be challenged, and, having had a quiet couple of weeks at work I've done that.
Apparently I've 'formally' requested he got banned. If I knew how I would!
I think a few of us have contributed more than we'd like to in the direction the board has gone over the last few weeks as snowballs stats, the application, interpretation and presentation of them has been challenged. One thing I would say is that it's been the usually more fair minded and rational posters doing it. That must say something?
I'm back to flat out at work now and so I'm switching off the snowball stuff from now on and hoping that the board gets back to discussing football.
by Snowball » 03 Nov 2010 22:50
Ian Royal
I've tried to ignore him, but it's so hard to do so as you've said because of the size and frequency of his posts.
by Ian Royal » 03 Nov 2010 22:56
by Snowball » 03 Nov 2010 22:59
by Wimb » 04 Nov 2010 11:48
Snowball Ian, you still average close on twice my posts per day AND YOU GET YOUR INFO FROM RADIO.
At least I actually watch live games.
Big deal that I sometimes have a few days free and concentrate on a subject. So?
11.2% of all my posts have been in a single thread (Shane Long) and at least 20% of all my posts have been defending Shane Long.
What else is a father supposed to do?
by Stranded » 04 Nov 2010 11:57
by Royal Rother » 04 Nov 2010 12:37
by Snowball » 04 Nov 2010 13:01
Royal Rother Ridiculous criticism of Snowball imo.
(But I'd respect him more if he cut the condescension. But then I've been guilty of that too on many occasions.)
by cmonurz » 04 Nov 2010 13:11
by Snowball » 04 Nov 2010 13:24
cmonurz Problem is Snowball, you take disagreement as 'ridicule', argument as 'pilliored'. They are not the same.
Users browsing this forum: ankeny, From Despair To Where?, Google Adsense [Bot], Reading4eva and 321 guests