by Snowball » 09 Nov 2010 20:53
by Wycombe Royal » 09 Nov 2010 21:00
by Snowball » 09 Nov 2010 21:19
by Snowball » 09 Nov 2010 21:20
by floyd__streete » 09 Nov 2010 21:27
Snowball A Goal every 1.97 Games (22 includes 7 Penalties) Gylfi (2 Goals against Premiership sides)
A Goal every 2.10 Games (10 includes 0 Penalties) Rasiak (0)
A Goal every 2.40 Games (56 includes 6 Penalties) Kitson (12? Goals v Premiership Sides)
A Goal every 2.41 Games (15 includes 1 Penalties) Church (1 Goals against Premiership Sides)
A Goal every 2.50 Games (31 includes 1 Penalties) Lita (8 Premiership Goals plus Cups?)
A Goal every 2.68 Games (55 includes 5 Penalties) Doyle (19 Goals against Premiership sides)
A Goal every 2.70 Games (15 includes 1 Penalties) Hunt (No Goals against Premiership Sides)
A Goal every 2.71 Games (32 includes 4 Penalties) LONG (10 Goals against Premiership Sides
A Goal every 4.93 Games (18 includes 0 Penalties) Kebe
by cmonurz » 09 Nov 2010 22:06
cmonurzSnowballcmonurz Grow up. I've been abundantly clear all the way through that my stats were for league games. All the way through.
Bull
More untrue accusations. My original post, on page 39, on this subject. I am clearly talking about league games. Perhaps you could just admit you missed that bit, instead of another rude response?Cmonurz And Snowball, Long's goal yesterday was his second in open play in his last 26 league appearances (25 starts). Prior to that he scored 4 in 4 league games, after another drought back to the start of last season.
So from the first league game last season his record for goals in open play is:
1. 15 games, no goals
2. 4 games, 4 goals
3. 26 games, 2 goals
I won't wait for an apology. Although seen as the worst I've ever posted in your direction is 'grow up', an apology for calling me stupid, a moron and a twat, and that you have no respect for me, is also due. I won't wait for that either.
by Wimb » 09 Nov 2010 22:08
by Ian Royal » 09 Nov 2010 22:12
by Snowball » 09 Nov 2010 23:02
floyd__streete
As we all feared - Long is the least effective striker we've had on the books in years. And yet he is a certain starter for us these days, no wonder we're going down the pan. Cheers for that sobering thought, Snowball.
by Snowball » 09 Nov 2010 23:03
by winchester_royal » 09 Nov 2010 23:11
Snowballfloyd__streete
As we all feared - Long is the least effective striker we've had on the books in years. And yet he is a certain starter for us these days, no wonder we're going down the pan. Cheers for that sobering thought, Snowball.
You're so totally right, of course
These stats show that it would take Doyle 268 games to get 100 goals, whereas with Long we'd have to go through all those 268 games and then wait for another three games! Meanwhile we'd have gone into administration and n=been relegated.
A Goal every 2.68 Games (55 includes 5 Penalties) Doyle (19 Goals against Premiership sides)
A Goal every 2.71 Games (32 includes 4 Penalties) LONG (10 Goals against Premiership Sides
by SLAMMED » 09 Nov 2010 23:13
by Snowball » 10 Nov 2010 00:45
winchester_royal
The big, BIG, difference being that most of Doyle's goals came in the premiership.
Also, a lot more of Long's goal have been scored when he's come off the bench, which you so passionately argue when the conversation turns to whether Church should start instead of Long are not as significant
by Snowball » 10 Nov 2010 00:46
SLAMMED Don't forget all LOLong's penalties. That clearly makes him Readings best ever pLOLayer.
by seahawk10 » 10 Nov 2010 01:29
by seahawk10 » 10 Nov 2010 01:32
by FiNeRaIn » 10 Nov 2010 02:51
seahawk10 He has a lovely nipple
by seahawk10 » 10 Nov 2010 05:16
FiNeRaInseahawk10 He has a lovely nipple
In before edit.
by Royal With Cheese » 10 Nov 2010 09:06
by cmonurz » 10 Nov 2010 09:36
SnowballSLAMMED Don't forget all LOLong's penalties. That clearly makes him Readings best ever pLOLayer.
You mean FOUR out of 32 goals?
Wow. Kitson had 6 in 56
Users browsing this forum: Duckhunter and 245 guests