by Snowball » 11 Nov 2010 01:04
by West_Reading » 11 Nov 2010 01:06
by Pseud O'Nym » 11 Nov 2010 01:11
Focher here is my analysis of the goal which i hope makes things a bit clearer
by Snowball » 11 Nov 2010 01:12
by chilipepper91 » 11 Nov 2010 01:19
Snowball 7 Harte - Never "skinned" and some solid tackles, but he did allow 2-3 shots from edge of box
by dantheloyalroyal » 11 Nov 2010 01:21
Good job.Pseud O'NymFocher here is my analysis of the goal which i hope makes things a bit clearer
by royalsteve » 11 Nov 2010 02:46
Alan Partridge Rare game for me, enjoyed it. Thought Reading were the better side and if the forwards of the two sides had been reversed and Reading's chances fell to them I think Reading walk off with a 3-0 win. The misses from Church and in particular Long in the 2nd half are criminal when you are at home to a top side, it should have hmade a busy linesman's decision completely irrelevant.
Jury's out on Harte, thought he was awful in the 1st half, slightly better in the second although only poor finishing stopped his man Burke scoring. He just gets beaten to easily. 3 times Zurab covered him after he just turned his back and gave up even trying to stop Burke beating him and only a stunning block by Griffin stopped a certain goal after Harte was caught out of position for the umpteenth time. It's a balancing act with HArte because he offers loads more than Armstrong going forward but his defensive work for an International defender is nothing short of atrocious.
I thought McAnuff was extremely average but other than that everyone else put a good shift in. 2 centre halves especially Zurab were excellent. I liked the system and I thought the 3 forwards caused problems for Cardiff.
If Reading want to be top 6 they need a number 1 striker. A poacher, goalscorer to partner Long and finish off these chances that were made. Even in the last few minuted HRK and Howard put some excellent crosses in, no one in the box challenging. Criminal. Someone like Kitson or Cureton in their prime would have been in there sniffing a chance out. They both would have scored the chances made for Church and Long during the game.
That's all Reading need, across the park they match up to pretty much every side in the league but ti's the forwards and their lack of goals over the course of the season that will cost them. If they can get someone who can get them 15 goals in the division they can definitely make the top 6. If they don't they'll finish about where they are now. 8th-12th.
by royalsteve » 11 Nov 2010 02:47
Snowball 7 Federici Solid, one VG save late on got us a point
8 Griffin... I just love the olf git
7 Mills Maybe 8. Can't remember much wrong but how many shots did Cardiff have second half?
7 Khiz Like Mills. One "dive" looking for a free was embarrassing and could have had a second yellow for simulation
7 Harte - Never "skinned" and some solid tackles, but he did allow 2-3 shots from edge of box
7 McAnuff - Might be stingy. Very good game IMO. I think he likes Kebe being out
9 Howard - Great tonight. If he could score six a season...
8 Karacan - Buzz-saw, and Cardiff have some very good players
8 Hunt - Early on was very, very good. In the right place to shin the goal. Got tired tho'
7 Church - The touch of Long 2008, but good cross for goal
8 Long - Led the line quite brilliantly. 9 if not for that missed lob
7 Tabb - Almost an 8 but not on for long enough
5 HRK - Not his best. Think it was a chance for Antonio
by royalsteve » 11 Nov 2010 02:49
handbags_harris Watford. That is all.
by Charles Dapper » 11 Nov 2010 07:10
by Avon Royal » 11 Nov 2010 07:16
Charles Dapper Would explain why the Cardiff fans didn't celebrate straight away.
by kwik-silva » 11 Nov 2010 08:47
SLAMMED I'm pretty sure it's impossible for the ball to hit the crossbar and post and also cross the line. It just can't happen.
Avon RoyalCharles Dapper Would explain why the Cardiff fans didn't celebrate straight away.
They, like any human being in the stadium without a flag it would seem, would have been physically unable to be 100% sure that it crossed the line.
by Stranded » 11 Nov 2010 08:50
Snowball It's easy to resolve the "Is it in?" debate
Look at what Federici does afterwards.
He doesn't protest, doesn't go crazy. He KNEW it was in
by RobRoyal » 11 Nov 2010 08:53
Ian Royal I think that photo shows it's close enough that you can hardly blame the officials whichever way they call it.
by Stranded » 11 Nov 2010 08:55
RobRoyalIan Royal I think that photo shows it's close enough that you can hardly blame the officials whichever way they call it.
What is this "close enough"? If it's in doubt, it's not a goal. The lino has to be sure.
Poor decision then.
by Snowball » 11 Nov 2010 09:07
StrandedSnowball It's easy to resolve the "Is it in?" debate
Look at what Federici does afterwards.
He doesn't protest, doesn't go crazy. He KNEW it was in
Reverse arguement is that no Cardiff player (and very few fans) celebrated as they KNEW it wasn't in.
No real problem with the decision in the cold light of day - was convinced at the time that it wasn't it and no replay or still cap has changed that view but the lino had to make the call and made the one he thought was right.
by Maguire » 11 Nov 2010 09:08
John Madejski's WalletMaguireJohn Madejski's Wallet To be fair tHo McD, tonight is probably the first time his subs have had such a negative impact on the game.
Seriously, how the f*ck was that donkey HRK ever going to improve on hunt?
Hunt was fukked and doing absolutely nothing. I called that sub and it was the right one. Tabb coming on was right too as they were all over us at the time.
Great miss from LOLong and I too thought the ball was in. Then again I was 100 yards away.
Happy enough with the Tabb sub, but HRK brings f*ck all effort into the team. Didnt bother helping in defence and didnt manage to beat the right back once (which the f*cked Hunt had done just before being subbed..... man even Howard managed it!). At least antonia might have been having a good-bas-savage day!
by Focher » 11 Nov 2010 09:21
dantheloyalroyal And now mine...
by Ingham » 11 Nov 2010 09:29
by handbags_harris » 11 Nov 2010 09:35
royalstevehandbags_harris Watford. That is all.
whats that got to do with it......thing is people go on and on about that goal, but noone talks about the legit goal that was disallowed for no reason whatsoever in the same game
Users browsing this forum: Royality creeps In, Royals and Racers and 289 guests