by andrew1957 » 11 Nov 2010 17:40
by Ian Royal » 11 Nov 2010 17:43
by blueroyals » 11 Nov 2010 17:57
by andrew1957 » 11 Nov 2010 17:59
blueroyals it's probably something to do with confidence. having a young side etc...
inb4 snowball
by PEARCEY » 11 Nov 2010 18:00
by blueroyals » 11 Nov 2010 18:02
andrew1957 I think you will find that it applies to all sides in the division. I have had a look and the number of times sides come back from a goal down to win is very few and far between.
by weybridgewanderer » 11 Nov 2010 18:11
blueroyalsandrew1957 I think you will find that it applies to all sides in the division. I have had a look and the number of times sides come back from a goal down to win is very few and far between.
probably more so with fat, unfit sides though; our team under Rodgers bring a prime example
by Tony Le Mesmer » 12 Nov 2010 08:50
by Maguire » 12 Nov 2010 09:43
by Tony Le Mesmer » 12 Nov 2010 10:06
by Wycombe Royal » 12 Nov 2010 10:16
by Snowball » 12 Nov 2010 10:18
Wycombe Royal This season in the Championship 7 teams have come from behind twice to win. They are:
Cardiff
Forest
Norwich
Leeds
Doncaster
Barnsley
Middlesbrough
In total it has only happened 19 times this season in the Chapionship.
by andrew1957 » 12 Nov 2010 13:04
SnowballWycombe Royal This season in the Championship 7 teams have come from behind twice to win. They are:
Cardiff
Forest
Norwich
Leeds
Doncaster
Barnsley
Middlesbrough
In total it has only happened 19 times this season in the Chapionship.
I take it you mean from 1-0 down? As Reading did it v Doncaster
by andrew1957 » 12 Nov 2010 13:06
Tony Le Mesmer Yes, but i think many would be surprised just how infrequent teams come from a goal down to win.
A quick look through Reading's league games shows its nearly a year since the team to score 1st lost. Derby away some 40 odd games ago. That's not that much out of the ordinary.
by Magnus » 12 Nov 2010 14:51
by Maguire » 12 Nov 2010 14:56
andrew1957Tony Le Mesmer Yes, but i think many would be surprised just how infrequent teams come from a goal down to win.
A quick look through Reading's league games shows its nearly a year since the team to score 1st lost. Derby away some 40 odd games ago. That's not that much out of the ordinary.
I think that was my point. We all know the first goal is important - but in actual fact it seems to be the absolute deciding factor more often than not.
If Brendan's team had not been so poor at holding on to leads (as they took the lead as often at the opposition) he would in all likelihood still be our manager.
by andrew1957 » 12 Nov 2010 15:09
Magnus Conversely - could it be said that conceding the first goal means you're much less likely to win the game?
I've not seen any stats on this but have a feeling it might be true.
The key thing here is how to we compare to other sides - without those stats you're just spouting hyperbole frankly.
by Wycombe Royal » 12 Nov 2010 15:10
andrew1957Magnus Conversely - could it be said that conceding the first goal means you're much less likely to win the game?
I've not seen any stats on this but have a feeling it might be true.
The key thing here is how to we compare to other sides - without those stats you're just spouting hyperbole frankly.
Don't think you read the original post as that does have stats for BOTH Reading scoring first and other team scoring first.
by andrew1957 » 12 Nov 2010 15:13
Maguireandrew1957Tony Le Mesmer Yes, but i think many would be surprised just how infrequent teams come from a goal down to win.
A quick look through Reading's league games shows its nearly a year since the team to score 1st lost. Derby away some 40 odd games ago. That's not that much out of the ordinary.
I think that was my point. We all know the first goal is important - but in actual fact it seems to be the absolute deciding factor more often than not.
If Brendan's team had not been so poor at holding on to leads (as they took the lead as often at the opposition) he would in all likelihood still be our manager.
So let me get this straight - goals are the biggest factor in determining the outcome of a game?
Stone the crows.
by andrew1957 » 12 Nov 2010 15:19
Wycombe Royalandrew1957Magnus Conversely - could it be said that conceding the first goal means you're much less likely to win the game?
I've not seen any stats on this but have a feeling it might be true.
The key thing here is how to we compare to other sides - without those stats you're just spouting hyperbole frankly.
Don't think you read the original post as that does have stats for BOTH Reading scoring first and other team scoring first.
I don't think you read his comments properly......
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Four Of Clubs, Keysfield, tidus_mi2, WestYorksRoyal and 331 guests