PieEater For me the jury is still out with Church. He's not quick, tall, or particularly skillful. A lot of his goals have been from being in the right place at the right time, from which you'd think he's got good positional instinct, but to me he doesn't seem to be very aware or react quickly enough to situations. Too often he makes the wrong decisions in possession.
His goal stats aren't bad, but how many great chances has he converted compared to how many he's fluffed? How many has he made for himself?
My "instincts" about Churchy would not be dissimilar to yours. I am convinced, even when I read his stats (that say different) that he misses lots of chances.
He doesn't
30 ON 29 Off 04 Hit Woodwork 2009-10
11 ON 09 Off 00 Hit Woodwork 2010-11
43-42 a fraction better than 50% on target, yet IN MY HEAD I think of Church as missing loads of clear-cut chances.
Personally I don't think of him as a clinical finisher, and yes he's had a fair few that seem to have gone in off him more than been "scored"... the deflection of Karacan's shot, the did-he-shoot or mean to pass at Burnley, the goal v Liverpool.
But players who have goals go in off them are priceless IMO. They are just "there". That's what John Aldridge was like at Newport. I don't think there was a part of his body he didn't score with (Ian, I mean external parts, and it's just a saying, anyway)
if he gets some more starts, and regular 15 minute subs, he should make double figures this season. That is pretty good for a (relative) kid (I don't mean a juvenile goat, Ian) in a middling, maybe slightly better side.
My worry is Church just seems the same old Church, whereas Long is definitely growing as a player, becoming much better at playing in others etc (when the support is there)... if HE (Longy, yes I know his name is LONG, Ian) can be persuaded to stay more central more often, and be selfish occasionally, IF he can get to 15 goals a season, then we'll have a special player on our hands.