by brendywendy » 17 Nov 2010 11:14
by Wimb » 17 Nov 2010 11:17
by Hoop Blah » 17 Nov 2010 11:40
Wimb I'm on the verge of saying Hi Gus....
by Snowball » 17 Nov 2010 11:46
by Wimb » 17 Nov 2010 11:48
Hoop BlahWimb I'm on the verge of saying Hi Gus....
I've thought about him being on a wind up a couple of times but I can't believe anyone is really that sad to go these lengths to get a reaction on a web forum.
by Snowball » 17 Nov 2010 11:52
by Wycombe Royal » 17 Nov 2010 11:58
by cmonurz » 17 Nov 2010 12:03
Wycombe Royal More selective stats. You can't compare like for like as there is no like for like. Every player is an individual, with a unique career.
The only fair way is to look at their total career goalscoring record rather than being selective and trying to omit parts of it just because it suits you better. They all started at different ages, they all had different childhoods, they all got their breaks at different times, they all got their breaks at different clubs in different leagues.
Stop trying to level a playing field that is made out of rock. It won't happen.
by Snowball » 17 Nov 2010 12:08
Wycombe Royal More selective stats. You can't compare like for like as there is no like for like. Every player is an individual, with a unique career.
The only fair way is to look at their total career goalscoring record rather than being selective and trying to omit parts of it just because it suits you better. They all started at different ages, they all had different childhoods, they all got their breaks at different times, they all got their breaks at different clubs in different leagues.
Stop trying to level a playing field that is made out of rock. It won't happen.
by Snowball » 17 Nov 2010 12:12
cmonurzWycombe Royal More selective stats. You can't compare like for like as there is no like for like. Every player is an individual, with a unique career.
The only fair way is to look at their total career goalscoring record rather than being selective and trying to omit parts of it just because it suits you better. They all started at different ages, they all had different childhoods, they all got their breaks at different times, they all got their breaks at different clubs in different leagues.
Stop trying to level a playing field that is made out of rock. It won't happen.
This.
And Theo Walcott is a winger.
by Wycombe Royal » 17 Nov 2010 12:14
by Snowball » 17 Nov 2010 12:14
by Wycombe Royal » 17 Nov 2010 12:17
Snowball NOVEMBER 2009 Wenger called Theo a striker
Wenger - Walcott could be a fantastic striker
By Nick Teale
Arsène Wenger says Theo Walcott could be a "fantastic" striker and may get a chance to take on the central role in the near future.
However, the Frenchman is cautious about bringing the 20-year-old back into the side too soon after his recovery from a knee injury sustained in the Gunners' 3-1 win over Birmingham in October.
Oops!
PS When does Ian take over the shift?
by brendywendy » 17 Nov 2010 12:29
by Wycombe Royal » 17 Nov 2010 12:37
brendywendy just shut the oxf*rd up.
what on earth possesses you bunch of sadsacks to even argue with the guy if you think hes that way out there?
id quite happily read the odd stat that i think is interesting, and ignore many of the rest.
its you lots constant harping on, contradicting, whingeing, and insulting that keeps him coming back with more.
if you hadnt bothered this thread would be about 5 pages long.
Shut up!Shut up!Shut up!Shut up!Shut up!
by Snowball » 17 Nov 2010 12:43
Wycombe RoyalArsène Wenger says Theo Walcott could be a "fantastic" striker and may get a chance to take on the central role in the near future.
However, the Frenchman is cautious about bringing the 20-year-old back into the side too soon after his recovery from a knee injury sustained in the Gunners' 3-1 win over Birmingham in October.
The fact that it says "COULD BE" means he isn't now (except in Snowball's world).
Nice "own goal"...
by Snowball » 17 Nov 2010 12:46
brendywendy just shut the oxf*rd up.
what on earth possesses you bunch of sadsacks to even argue with the guy if you think hes that way out there?
id quite happily read the odd stat that i think is interesting, and ignore many of the rest.
its you lots constant harping on, contradicting, whingeing, and insulting that keeps him coming back with more.
if you hadnt bothered this thread would be about 5 pages long.
Shut up!Shut up!Shut up!Shut up!Shut up!
by brendywendy » 17 Nov 2010 12:47
Wycombe Royalbrendywendy just shut the oxf*rd up.
what on earth possesses you bunch of sadsacks to even argue with the guy if you think hes that way out there?
id quite happily read the odd stat that i think is interesting, and ignore many of the rest.
its you lots constant harping on, contradicting, whingeing, and insulting that keeps him coming back with more.
if you hadnt bothered this thread would be about 5 pages long.
Shut up!Shut up!Shut up!Shut up!Shut up!
I was at the point where it was annoying and ruining my HNA experience. But now I now I am finding that it helps my day go quicker.......if you don't like it don't open the topic as you know what it is going to contain.......
by Snowball » 17 Nov 2010 12:47
Ideal Jesus.. this is just getting worse.
by Gordons Cumming » 17 Nov 2010 12:50
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Royals and Racers, Yahoo [Bot] and 201 guests