by PlasticRoyale » 02 Dec 2010 16:16
by Row V » 02 Dec 2010 16:17
by T.O.G. » 02 Dec 2010 16:17
by Alan Partridge » 02 Dec 2010 16:19
soggy biscuitAlan Partridge Apart from the country itself being completely unsuitable to play football in?
They are having to build all the stadiums especially so they can host this event. Playing football in the middle of the day in Qatar is absolutely insane.
?
So what if they are having to build the stadiums. As long as they are done on time and suitable what does it matter?
Stadiums will be air conned too so the weather won't be a problem.
by prostak » 02 Dec 2010 16:20
by papereyes » 02 Dec 2010 16:21
by prostak » 02 Dec 2010 16:23
by Hoop Blah » 02 Dec 2010 16:23
soggy biscuit So what if they are having to build the stadiums. As long as they are done on time and suitable what does it matter?
Stadiums will be air conned too so the weather won't be a problem.
by Barry the bird boggler » 02 Dec 2010 16:24
by Maguire » 02 Dec 2010 16:25
Alan Partridge Stadiums will be air conned because football can't be played in natural conditions. It's utter madness. Acountry with a population of 600,000 who have contributed as much to football as the Isle of Man has to tennis. There is absolutely no reason to give them a World Cup. What was thier pitch like? We have no grounds, no history, the completely wrong climate for the game but we'll give you a nice holiday and at the end of the day our part of the World hasn't had this yet. Literally any country that's never hosted the World Cup should just apply now because they'll be a certainty.
by leon » 02 Dec 2010 16:27
Maguire LOL that, by the end of 2022, Qatar and England will have won the same number of World Cups. Just a complete joke.
by southbank1871 » 02 Dec 2010 16:27
by Mr Irascible » 02 Dec 2010 16:27
by who are ya? » 02 Dec 2010 16:28
by RoyalChicagoFC » 02 Dec 2010 16:28
Royal Rothersoggy biscuitRoyal Rother I don't really care tbh, but we all know that anything that can be bought will be bought, and World Cups are no different it seems.
Not really. I felt after the presentations this morning that we were clearly the best bid but made my antipathy about the outcome clear long ago.
Do you believe that England had the worst of the 4 bids?
Do you believe that money and prejudice had no part to play in the outcome?
by 1871 Royal » 02 Dec 2010 16:29
by ZacNaloen » 02 Dec 2010 16:32
by Harpers So Solid Crew » 02 Dec 2010 16:33
by Maguire » 02 Dec 2010 16:34
by Mr Irascible » 02 Dec 2010 16:35
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 135 guests