Barack Obama I think it was the wrong decision to give it to Qatar
What a lack of class
by soggy biscuit » 02 Dec 2010 20:47
Barack Obama I think it was the wrong decision to give it to Qatar
by soggy biscuit » 02 Dec 2010 20:49
Tails [yes, hardly unbiased Soggy].
by PEARCEY » 02 Dec 2010 20:49
Royal Rother Stan Collymore and the usually fairly sober Mark Saggers pulling no punches on TalkSport. Blatter's lawyers might be interested in what they've been saying.
They are in no doubt whatsoever that the whole process is corrupt, from start to finish.
by winchester_royal » 02 Dec 2010 20:52
PEARCEYRoyal Rother Stan Collymore and the usually fairly sober Mark Saggers pulling no punches on TalkSport. Blatter's lawyers might be interested in what they've been saying.
They are in no doubt whatsoever that the whole process is corrupt, from start to finish.
How many of those that voted are corrupt? Surely they cannot all be bent?
by Tails » 02 Dec 2010 20:54
soggy biscuitTails [yes, hardly unbiased Soggy].
oh dear
by soggy biscuit » 02 Dec 2010 20:56
Tailssoggy biscuitTails [yes, hardly unbiased Soggy].
oh dear
I was acknowledging your comment re: the seemingly biased nature of BBC reporting of which I was drawing my ill informed perception of recent exchanges between Russian/English counterparts.
by Sarah Star » 02 Dec 2010 20:58
by soggy biscuit » 02 Dec 2010 20:59
Sarah Star What was it they were looking for again?
by Tails » 02 Dec 2010 21:01
soggy biscuit
Thought this was a dig at me over what someone else said earlier!
by Sarah Star » 02 Dec 2010 21:09
soggy biscuitSarah Star What was it they were looking for again?
Things the England bid didn't have
by The whole year inn » 02 Dec 2010 21:16
by prostak » 02 Dec 2010 21:21
by The Surgeon of Crowthorne » 02 Dec 2010 21:35
Wycombe Royal I just had a look at the Qatar bid and 6 of the stadiums will be in one city - Doha. Only one other city has a large population. The others are around 30,000 population. That's like Woodley being a host city.
Oh and then there is the other host city that they haven't even built yet - it is still a work in progress but will apparently have a population of around 250k by 2022.
Madness.
by frimmers3 » 02 Dec 2010 21:45
by prostak » 02 Dec 2010 21:47
frimmers3 does anybody really care about the world cup any more? after all,the main aspect of said are seen in action day in day out on sky sports..there is no longer any mystery,nor any kudos in the winning of said.
by frimmers3 » 02 Dec 2010 22:01
prostakfrimmers3 does anybody really care about the world cup any more? after all,the main aspect of said are seen in action day in day out on sky sports..there is no longer any mystery,nor any kudos in the winning of said.
So speaks a fan of a country who haven't won anything in decades...
by LUX » 02 Dec 2010 22:03
Mr Angry
Russians, Israelis and South Africans are meant to be hideous holiday makers; arrogant and constantly demanding.
by frimmers3 » 02 Dec 2010 22:12
prostakfrimmers3 does anybody really care about the world cup any more? after all,the main aspect of said are seen in action day in day out on sky sports..there is no longer any mystery,nor any kudos in the winning of said.
So speaks a fan of a country who haven't won anything in decades...
by prostak » 02 Dec 2010 22:13
frimmers3prostakfrimmers3 does anybody really care about the world cup any more? after all,the main aspect of said are seen in action day in day out on sky sports..there is no longer any mystery,nor any kudos in the winning of said.
So speaks a fan of a country who haven't won anything in decades...
? how does that equate with my stance that the football world cup has diminished in value due to over exposure and familiarity?
by LUX » 02 Dec 2010 22:15
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 62 guests