by Ian Royal » 14 Dec 2010 00:18
by Big Foot » 14 Dec 2010 13:36
by Silver Fox » 14 Dec 2010 13:56
by prostak » 14 Dec 2010 16:23
by Scylla » 14 Dec 2010 16:58
Ian Royal Hodgson looks like a man over the edge. And this has got to be putting a massive dent in his reputation too.
by Bandini » 14 Dec 2010 17:08
by prostak » 14 Dec 2010 19:17
by Ian Royal » 14 Dec 2010 19:31
by roadrunner » 14 Dec 2010 20:05
prostak Always mediocre? Taking an apparently relegation-bound side to the Swedish championship in his first proper managerial job? Making Switzerland, SWITZERLAND for God's sake, look like a very decent side, and number 3 in the FIFA rankings (their Euro 96 performance after losing him to Inter showing that he wasn't just fortunate to be in charge of a golden generation)? Fulham, in a European final!
Everywhere Hodgson has been given time, he's ended up building a successful team. Everywhere he's 'failed' has been beset by unrealistic expectations by fans who've tasted recent, unexpected success and unrealistically demand this continues.
by soggy biscuit » 14 Dec 2010 20:27
Scylla What reputation? He's always been mediocre.
by Scylla » 15 Dec 2010 12:44
Ian Royal Did a really mediocre job turning Fulham from relegation certainties half way through a season to 7th best team in the country the next season.
by Victor Meldrew » 15 Dec 2010 13:40
ScyllaIan Royal Hodgson looks like a man over the edge. And this has got to be putting a massive dent in his reputation too.
What reputation? He's always been mediocre.
by Scylla » 15 Dec 2010 13:48
by Victor Meldrew » 15 Dec 2010 14:45
Scylla I didn't realise that being appointed was the mark of success. I thought that you had to achieve something once you were there. Sir Alex must be gutted he's wasted so much winning football matches.
by daswonder » 15 Dec 2010 17:27
Ideal The problem for Hodgson and Liverpool is that they have a group of players that:
-defense is used to man marking, and playing 2-3 DMC's to protect them
Hodgson wants:
-zonal marking for the defenders (if you don't know what it is, look it up. It's the modern way successful teams play.)
by Scylla » 15 Dec 2010 20:31
Victor MeldrewScylla I didn't realise that being appointed was the mark of success. I thought that you had to achieve something once you were there. Sir Alex must be gutted he's wasted so much winning football matches.
Er...you were talking about mediocre.
In my book to be appointed by Inter twice,drag the Swiss national side up from a nonentity,manage other national sides as well as 3 sides in the Premier league suggests to me that a lot of people in world football hold him in some regard and don't think of him as mediocre.
Mediocre is Alan Pardew,Brian Laws or Gordon Strachan,not Roy Hodgson.
by Ian Royal » 15 Dec 2010 21:08
by Zammo » 15 Dec 2010 21:22
by Scylla » 15 Dec 2010 21:36
Ian Royal You don't have to manage one of the biggest clubs in the country / world to be better than a mediocre manager. And if he can get the Liverpool job he certainly could have gotten all the others except possibly Chelsea, and obviously Man Utd & Arsenal, seeing as they don't exactly do much in the way of manager swapping.
There are different skills involved in managing really big sides. Maybe he's not the right man for a big job like that, but he's hardly mediocre by any stretch of the imagination.
by Royal Rother » 15 Dec 2010 21:39
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 48 guests