by Big Foot » 30 Dec 2010 10:41
by shaka's shorts » 30 Dec 2010 10:49
by Ferris » 30 Dec 2010 10:52
Big Foot Who would you bring IN?
Who would you ship OUT?
Realistically, I would like to see us make Leigertwood's signing permanent if we can get him for a fee which is right for the club and QPR. I think he relishes playing with his old mate Jobi McAnuff and there'd be fairly compelling grounds on which Elwood could move here - don't know if he's a family man, but he wouldn't have to move very far for a starters.
It's also glaringly obvious - despite Long's mini revival - that we need a new striker who can change the game. I would like the club to sign Charlie Austin (chances of this actually happening are 50/50, I'd say it's a case of CA deciding whether or not he could stand the sight of Nicky Hammond again). Signing him would signal our intent to us fans and to the other teams out there as well as massively annoying our M4 neighbours. Austin is 6ft+ and from what I've seen of him, good in the air & I think he could form a deadly partnership with any of our existing 3 first choice strikers.
Unfortunately, the club will need to balance the books and the money spent on Austin will have to come from somewhere. I would cash in on Federici whilst he's still got a year+ to run on his contract and his stock is relatively high. We've got 3 very good young keepers at the club and so wouldn't be too short of cover. I'd make Andersen first choice keeper.
Additionally, I would sell Brian Howard as he's been out of form all season and isn't a box to box midfielder, nor a combative tackling midfield or an out and out attacking midfielder similar to Gylfi. I just don't see how he could fit into the team as anything other than a passenger.
by Big Foot » 30 Dec 2010 11:02
Yup, having just read a couple of posts up I realised I'd completely forgotten about them.FerrisBig Foot Who would you bring IN?
Who would you ship OUT?
Realistically, I would like to see us make Leigertwood's signing permanent if we can get him for a fee which is right for the club and QPR. I think he relishes playing with his old mate Jobi McAnuff and there'd be fairly compelling grounds on which Elwood could move here - don't know if he's a family man, but he wouldn't have to move very far for a starters.
It's also glaringly obvious - despite Long's mini revival - that we need a new striker who can change the game. I would like the club to sign Charlie Austin (chances of this actually happening are 50/50, I'd say it's a case of CA deciding whether or not he could stand the sight of Nicky Hammond again). Signing him would signal our intent to us fans and to the other teams out there as well as massively annoying our M4 neighbours. Austin is 6ft+ and from what I've seen of him, good in the air & I think he could form a deadly partnership with any of our existing 3 first choice strikers.
Unfortunately, the club will need to balance the books and the money spent on Austin will have to come from somewhere. I would cash in on Federici whilst he's still got a year+ to run on his contract and his stock is relatively high. We've got 3 very good young keepers at the club and so wouldn't be too short of cover. I'd make Andersen first choice keeper.
Additionally, I would sell Brian Howard as he's been out of form all season and isn't a box to box midfielder, nor a combative tackling midfield or an out and out attacking midfielder similar to Gylfi. I just don't see how he could fit into the team as anything other than a passenger.
Pretty decent assessment tbf. The only thing I'd add to that would be trying to dump the likes of Mooney, Davies and Williams.
by NR_Royal » 30 Dec 2010 11:22
shaka's shorts Sell - Williams, Mooney, Scott Davies, Bignall
Loan out - Hamer, McCarthy (get Anderson back), Kelly, Taylor, D'Ath
Buy - Elwood, Austin
by handbags_harris » 30 Dec 2010 11:27
by muddyfeet » 30 Dec 2010 11:29
by Big Foot » 30 Dec 2010 11:34
As a fan, I agree. However, putting my "management" cap on and thinking of what the saleable assets are and impact it'd have on the team I'd say that selling Federici instead of say, Kebe or McAnuff would have the least amount of pain associated whilst also maximising transfer income.handbags_harris Federici, on current form, must stay...
For me that deal is already done so discounted it from my original post. Can't see anything other than him joining us full time be it Jan or in summer.handbags_harris I would also look at signing Khizanishvili for a nominal fee with his contract up in the summer. Blackburn's new owners and manager may be willing to do a decent deal.
I think that was more to do with us putting McAnuff in the middle and having Antonio's energy as an additional outlet.handbags_harris In response to Big Fot, Brian Howard must stay because, as demonstrated on Tuesday, he is the nly player who actually has the ability to get his foot on the ball and knock it around. He may not do it very well at times, but he is something totally different to Karacan, Leigertwood and Tabb. Quelle surprise that we actually looked a much better team when he came on on Tuesday.
by Svlad Cjelli » 30 Dec 2010 11:47
by Thomas L'Heureux » 30 Dec 2010 12:16
handbags_harris I would personally finally get rid of Scott Davies, end Gunnarsson's reign here , and look to sign Leigertwood permanently. In response to Big Fot, Brian Howard must stay because, as demonstrated on Tuesday, he is the nly player who actually has the ability to get his foot on the ball and knock it around. He may not do it very well at times, but he is something totally different to Karacan, Leigertwood and Tabb. Quelle surprise that we actually looked a much better team when he came on on Tuesday.
by Snowball » 30 Dec 2010 12:19
by Big Foot » 30 Dec 2010 12:20
Thomas L'Heureuxhandbags_harris I would personally finally get rid of Scott Davies, end Gunnarsson's reign here , and look to sign Leigertwood permanently. In response to Big Fot, Brian Howard must stay because, as demonstrated on Tuesday, he is the nly player who actually has the ability to get his foot on the ball and knock it around. He may not do it very well at times, but he is something totally different to Karacan, Leigertwood and Tabb. Quelle surprise that we actually looked a much better team when he came on on Tuesday.
Scott Davies > Brian Howard.
by Svlad Cjelli » 30 Dec 2010 12:23
by Thomas L'Heureux » 30 Dec 2010 12:23
Big FootThomas L'Heureuxhandbags_harris I would personally finally get rid of Scott Davies, end Gunnarsson's reign here , and look to sign Leigertwood permanently. In response to Big Fot, Brian Howard must stay because, as demonstrated on Tuesday, he is the nly player who actually has the ability to get his foot on the ball and knock it around. He may not do it very well at times, but he is something totally different to Karacan, Leigertwood and Tabb. Quelle surprise that we actually looked a much better team when he came on on Tuesday.
Scott Davies > Brian Howard.
I'd go along with that too, I can't believe he's not been given a chance here
by Big Foot » 30 Dec 2010 12:42
Svlad Cjelli You can't always just "get rid" of players who are under contract - even if another club does want them they may not be prepared to accept the cut in wages. (Would you?)
So if you have to pay off a player's whoel contract you save nothing.
by Forbury Lion » 30 Dec 2010 12:52
Forgot about him!muddyfeet Even Scunny have stated they wouldn't take Williams back
by Stranded » 30 Dec 2010 12:54
Svlad Cjelli A Colchester supporter on Twitter reports that Mooney is being recalled when his loan ends (tomorrow).
No idea if that's to re sold/loaned elsewhere or to join the squad.
by ZacNaloen » 30 Dec 2010 12:56
I would also drop Bignall and Bell-Baggie off the books as they aren't showing the promise that their youth suggested now.
by Forbury Lion » 30 Dec 2010 12:57
What's the budget?Big Foot Who would you bring IN?
Who would you ship OUT?
by Forbury Lion » 30 Dec 2010 12:59
I imagine salary isn't an issue at that level, So might as well take a chance and see if they develop into something special or something more profitable to sell.ZacNaloenI would also drop Bignall and Bell-Baggie off the books as they aren't showing the promise that their youth suggested now.
Very harsh on two players who are still very young.
Particularly Bell-Baggie who is only 18
Users browsing this forum: Clyde1998, Keysfield, mikey_1871, Sutekh, WestYorksRoyal and 278 guests