SPECULATION - Charlie Austin

483 posts
User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: SPECULATION - Charlie Austin

by Ian Royal » 06 Jan 2011 21:41

You can take your cheating boom and bust, and shove it up your arse, thanks. Happily the club agrees with me and not you.

Pete10
Member
Posts: 196
Joined: 18 Jan 2005 12:14
Location: Jack Mansell's total football....

Re: SPECULATION - Charlie Austin

by Pete10 » 06 Jan 2011 21:43

We could do with getting the lad Austin . Reading have the money .

KDRF
Member
Posts: 163
Joined: 03 Sep 2010 18:22

Re: SPECULATION - Charlie Austin

by KDRF » 06 Jan 2011 21:51

This is a genuine fact, Charlie austin was at the madejski stadium yesterday, I don't know why, he could have just been visiting to meet an old academy friend, but he was genuinely there.

Royalee
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6470
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 12:58
Location: Reading, hazar

Re: SPECULATION - Charlie Austin

by Royalee » 06 Jan 2011 21:53

Ian Royal You can take your cheating boom and bust, and shove it up your arse, thanks. Happily the club agrees with me and not you.


Deloluded.

pea
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2261
Joined: 07 Mar 2009 16:16
Location: brighton

Re: SPECULATION - Charlie Austin

by pea » 06 Jan 2011 23:26

FiNeRaIn
Ian Royal
Everyone is in financial difficulties after relegation from the Prem, especially when they stop getting the parachute payment. Plenty end up in administration and or falling apart and getting relegated again. It's a sign of how the club is managed that there hasn't even been a whisper of the word administration and largely we're still competing at the right end of the table. And that's despite a fair few quite serious mistakes in signings and management over the last 4 years.


We don't need to whisper it, because we are actually ACTING like we are in administration. We have signed less people than portsmouth amongst others, how do you now see how bad it is?


Portsmouth started the season with 13 professional players to be fair...


User avatar
FiNeRaIn
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 6231
Joined: 22 Jul 2004 17:44
Location: Los Angeles

Re: SPECULATION - Charlie Austin

by FiNeRaIn » 06 Jan 2011 23:41

Royalee
Ian Royal You can take your cheating boom and bust, and shove it up your arse, thanks. Happily the club agrees with me and not you.


Deloluded.



User avatar
Svlad Cjelli
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 4605
Joined: 14 May 2008 09:25
Location: It's the Premier LEAGUE, you cretins. The Premiership hasn't existed for years.

Re: SPECULATION - Charlie Austin

by Svlad Cjelli » 06 Jan 2011 23:46

Ian Royal
FiNeRaIn
Ian Royal
Everyone is in financial difficulties after relegation from the Prem, especially when they stop getting the parachute payment. Plenty end up in administration and or falling apart and getting relegated again. It's a sign of how the club is managed that there hasn't even been a whisper of the word administration and largely we're still competing at the right end of the table. And that's despite a fair few quite serious mistakes in signings and management over the last 4 years.


We don't need to whisper it, because we are actually ACTING like we are in administration. We have signed less people than portsmouth amongst others, how do you now see how bad it is?


Oh really? I hadn't noticed us being unable to pay players, staff, the Taxman or St John's Ambulance. Or having an adminstrator appointed and getting most of our debt wiped for nothing. Or the court cases from our various creditors trying to wind us up.

We have a good team, a good manager and are in minimal danger of getting into significant financial trouble, which is one of the major reasons you'll see teams struggling with relegation. We challenging for a play off place, despite being in the middle of a rebuilding phase.

I don't see it's bad because it isn't.

A club's finances detereorate over the season - you start with all the ST money in the bank, and the cash declines as the year goes on. I'm virtually certain that if we'd not sold Gylfi when we did or in this Jan transfer window (when he was expected to leave) then we would definitely have gone into administartion by the end of this season.

User avatar
SpaceCruiser
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 5590
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 14:17
Location: Desperately seeking to return home

Re: SPECULATION - Charlie Austin

by SpaceCruiser » 07 Jan 2011 00:18

Is it because our attendances haven't been good this season?

User avatar
Svlad Cjelli
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 4605
Joined: 14 May 2008 09:25
Location: It's the Premier LEAGUE, you cretins. The Premiership hasn't existed for years.

Re: SPECULATION - Charlie Austin

by Svlad Cjelli » 07 Jan 2011 00:29

That doesn't help, but it's not just down to that. The salaries paid out in the two years after relegation - and especially in the first year - were just too high compared with the income. Year 1 was a gamble to go straight back up that didn't come off.


Always_Royal
Member
Posts: 45
Joined: 22 Jun 2005 15:12
Location: Finchampstead

Re: SPECULATION - Charlie Austin

by Always_Royal » 07 Jan 2011 08:54


tee peg
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1800
Joined: 27 Sep 2005 13:05
Location: gloucester

Re: SPECULATION - Charlie Austin

by tee peg » 07 Jan 2011 09:13

End of thread. :lol:

User avatar
Who Moved The Goalposts?
Member
Posts: 954
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 08:23
Location: Tilehurst, 4 miles from heaven & hell

Re: SPECULATION - Charlie Austin

by Who Moved The Goalposts? » 07 Jan 2011 09:17

pea
FiNeRaIn
Ian Royal
Everyone is in financial difficulties after relegation from the Prem, especially when they stop getting the parachute payment. Plenty end up in administration and or falling apart and getting relegated again. It's a sign of how the club is managed that there hasn't even been a whisper of the word administration and largely we're still competing at the right end of the table. And that's despite a fair few quite serious mistakes in signings and management over the last 4 years.


We don't need to whisper it, because we are actually ACTING like we are in administration. We have signed less people than portsmouth amongst others, how do you now see how bad it is?


Portsmouth started the season with 13 professional players to be fair...


Yes, but then forked out on Sonko, Lawrence and Kitson - the latter two being paid £20K per week - with the ink barely dry on the CVA "entitling" their suppliers to a small fraction of pennies in the pound over 5 years. :evil:

andrew1957
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 4368
Joined: 29 Sep 2006 14:40
Location: Reading

Re: SPECULATION - Charlie Austin

by andrew1957 » 07 Jan 2011 09:19

Svlad Cjelli
A club's finances detereorate over the season - you start with all the ST money in the bank, and the cash declines as the year goes on. I'm virtually certain that if we'd not sold Gylfi when we did or in this Jan transfer window (when he was expected to leave) then we would definitely have gone into administartion by the end of this season.


Absolute rubbish. As far as we are aware the club has ZERO debt at the moment apart from possibly unrepaid loans to Sir john. Even if we ended up with a debt of £4M at the end of the season this would hardly put us in administration as the club has assets - the ground, the players etc. Clubs only go into admin when their loans exceed their assets. We are incredibly stable.

I have agreed with the club being run frugally but this is now being taken to a ridiculous level.


User avatar
tomrfcurz
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1202
Joined: 22 May 2006 15:33
Location: Reading

Re: SPECULATION - Charlie Austin

by tomrfcurz » 07 Jan 2011 09:45

He's the video interview, still seems keen to get Leigertwood though:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HgUApjcm ... r_embedded

User avatar
brendywendy
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 12060
Joined: 04 Aug 2006 15:29
Location: coming straight outa crowthorne

Re: SPECULATION - Charlie Austin

by brendywendy » 07 Jan 2011 10:20

FiNeRaIn I;m not having this priced out nonsense. Reading have received the highest amount of outgoing transfers than the entire football league and half the prem in the last three years, they have also spend not very much in terms of most of the championship and premierleague in terms of wages on top of that. We can DEFINITELY afford to bring him in so stop this nonsense about money and get it done.



at last , the club accountant comes on and spills the beans- you are just what this board needs, to explain exactly where all the money has gone.

User avatar
brendywendy
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 12060
Joined: 04 Aug 2006 15:29
Location: coming straight outa crowthorne

Re: SPECULATION - Charlie Austin

by brendywendy » 07 Jan 2011 10:22

andrew1957
FiNeRaIn
Ian Royal
Everyone is in financial difficulties after relegation from the Prem, especially when they stop getting the parachute payment. Plenty end up in administration and or falling apart and getting relegated again. It's a sign of how the club is managed that there hasn't even been a whisper of the word administration and largely we're still competing at the right end of the table. And that's despite a fair few quite serious mistakes in signings and management over the last 4 years.


We don't need to whisper it, because we are actually ACTING like we are in administration. We have signed less people than portsmouth amongst others, how do you now see how bad it is?


Agreed.

In the last 5 years we have made more than £20M profit on player sales plus squandered two year PL income and two years parachute payments and yet spent all but nothing reinvesting in the squad (the current squad cost just over £5.5M to assemble - see below). It is very disappointing and you really do wonder where the money has gone. Hardly a well run club if we have squandered all this on player wages for mainly very average players.

I like the Blackpool approach of limiting wages to £10K per week even in the PL and they will benefit from this when they inevitably get relegated this season or next.

The total squad cost of £5,545,000 is made up of the following transfer fees paid – Mills £1.5M, N. Hunt £600K, McAnuff £500K, Armstrong £500K, Howard £500K, Cummings £300K, Tabb £300K, Griffin £250K, Kebe £250K, Mooney £200K, Ingimarsson £175K (in total), Harte 150K, Andersen £100K, Gunnarsson £100K, Antonio £100K and Long £20K




stop doing the accounts as if they only consist of transfer fees you bumbling fool.
massive LOL at us making a 20 million profit.no wonder you are confused about the finances if you truly believe that

User avatar
brendywendy
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 12060
Joined: 04 Aug 2006 15:29
Location: coming straight outa crowthorne

Re: SPECULATION - Charlie Austin

by brendywendy » 07 Jan 2011 10:24

Royalee
SpaceCruiser Christ, the usual moan about us not spending money and £1m being "not steep".

:roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:


Roll your eyes all you want, but you've not put through any proper argument and any Reading fan who thinks the football club itself has made a loss in football-related matters (Madejski taking money back out aside) is frankly braindead - just look at the transfer fees and the wages we've offloaded, plus the TV money.


at teh last set of accounts JM had not taken any money out of the club.
and you cannot just do the accounts on transfer fees.(well you can, but thats cos youre an idiot)

User avatar
brendywendy
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 12060
Joined: 04 Aug 2006 15:29
Location: coming straight outa crowthorne

Re: SPECULATION - Charlie Austin

by brendywendy » 07 Jan 2011 10:27

andrew1957
Ian Royal
FiNeRaIn We don't need to whisper it, because we are actually ACTING like we are in administration. We have signed less people than portsmouth amongst others, how do you now see how bad it is?


Oh really? I hadn't noticed us being unable to pay players, staff, the Taxman or St John's Ambulance. Or having an adminstrator appointed and getting most of our debt wiped for nothing. Or the court cases from our various creditors trying to wind us up.

We have a good team, a good manager and are in minimal danger of getting into significant financial trouble, which is one of the major reasons you'll see teams struggling with relegation. We challenging for a play off place, despite being in the middle of a rebuilding phase.

I don't see it's bad because it isn't.


Neither have we been in two Cup Finals or been one of the top clubs in Europe (Leeds).


if youd take that, and pay for it with two relegations, and a load of seasons in the lower leagues, then you are probably supporting the wrong club

User avatar
winchester_royal
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 11160
Joined: 28 Aug 2007 21:32
Location: How many Spaniards does it take to change a bulb? Just Juan.

Re: SPECULATION - Charlie Austin

by winchester_royal » 07 Jan 2011 10:37

Sky Sports now reporting we've made a bid.

User avatar
Kitson12
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2172
Joined: 30 Mar 2005 18:47
Location: Challenge42 World Record Holder!!

Re: SPECULATION - Charlie Austin

by Kitson12 » 07 Jan 2011 10:49

winchester_royal Sky Sports now reporting we've made a bid.

Have they disclosed how much the bid was?

483 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Four Of Clubs, morganb, Who Moved The Goalposts? and 55 guests

It is currently 04 Dec 2024 17:09