by Royal Lady » 08 Jan 2011 09:21
by under the tin » 08 Jan 2011 09:31
Sir Rodger Doyle JM has no money left. He is skint. Any money left over from the Gylfi transfer will go toward covering the running costs of the club. This will allow him to remain as the chairman without having to invest any further money into the club. You would have to work out what the shortfall is likely to be year on year before you could calculate future player sales.
by Royal Lady » 08 Jan 2011 09:34
by under the tin » 08 Jan 2011 09:43
Royal Lady Perhaps he shouldn't have got so involved in the Station Hill project. And is he expecting the hotel to "fend for itself" too?
by strap » 08 Jan 2011 09:46
Royal Monk This is exactly why i didnt renew my season ticket , i was fed up of spending my hard earned backing the club/team when the owner only leant his money and took it back to the detriment of the club/team
by strap » 08 Jan 2011 09:48
under the tinRoyal Lady Perhaps he shouldn't have got so involved in the Station Hill project. And is he expecting the hotel to "fend for itself" too?
The hotel's expected to make money.
FWIW, I think that the things like Station Hill are a convenient smokescreen. I believe that he's extremely pi$$ed of with player wages being so out of his control.
by Harpers So Solid Crew » 08 Jan 2011 09:49
by Northern Git » 08 Jan 2011 10:00
strapunder the tin From previous accounts, the Hotel generates c. 500k profit to the Club every year. There is a loan of c. £16.5M outstanding on the hotel, guaranteed by Mr Mad at 0% interest. The hotel is 100% owned by RFC.
by Royal Lady » 08 Jan 2011 10:04
by Royal Lady » 08 Jan 2011 10:17
by under the tin » 08 Jan 2011 10:18
Harpers So Solid Crew Players wages are fully within his control, set a cap and stick to it, if we cannot afford the high wages say so, there must be plenty of decent players who would be happy to play at RFC.
ANd if we try to sign a player and it falls through due to high wage demands then say so.
What we are also missing is a Parky or Murty, a fans player, and from looking at the squad there is no one even remotely near it.
by Wimb » 08 Jan 2011 10:46
by Royal Lady » 08 Jan 2011 10:56
by Stranded » 08 Jan 2011 11:06
by Wimb » 08 Jan 2011 11:09
Royal Lady Mills cost £2 million and was one of the most highly rated defenders in the division. What's your point here? How is he for US?
with potential squad fillers/stand ins like Cummings and Kelly and we look in good shape.
Seriously??
We've got a squad that is EASILY capable of challenging any team in this league Why don't we then? We've had some naff draws recently
And if you think Leeds, Cardiff, Swansea, QPR etc aren't going to be strengthening for the final push to the season, you're deluded. We COULD buy someone in the transfer window, but then, we bought Ian Harte for £50k or whatever it was - you reap what you sow.
If you think JM is still showing ambition - personally, I think you're wrong.
by under the tin » 08 Jan 2011 11:15
Stranded I love the fact that we are doing well, which we are this season to date, it's because the rest of the division is ropey and not that we might, just might, be doing things right for the here and now.
by under the tin » 08 Jan 2011 11:19
WimbRoyal Lady Mills cost £2 million and was one of the most highly rated defenders in the division. What's your point here? How is he for US?
with potential squad fillers/stand ins like Cummings and Kelly and we look in good shape.
Seriously??
We've got a squad that is EASILY capable of challenging any team in this league Why don't we then? We've had some naff draws recently
And if you think Leeds, Cardiff, Swansea, QPR etc aren't going to be strengthening for the final push to the season, you're deluded. We COULD buy someone in the transfer window, but then, we bought Ian Harte for £50k or whatever it was - you reap what you sow.
If you think JM is still showing ambition - personally, I think you're wrong.
It's eight days into the window, how do you know we won't strengthen?
Mills isn't terrible and he's still a good defender with the potential to get better. He's not lived up to his fee quite yet but he's not costing us goals and he's won us a couple of games.
The thing about a squad is that at this level you can't have a player like Griffin to back him up. A) we can't afford the wages and B) which player of that quality wants to sit on a bench? Kelly and Cummings have shown when they've played that they've capable of standing in on a temporary basis just fine, don't cost a lot and can only improve.
We have challenged every team in the league, bar a drab defeat at Boro and a mauling at QPR but then every team has those results, QPR got beat at home by Watford, Leeds thumped at home by Cardiff etc.
I don't think it's a case of showing ambition, it's a case of managing a football club. His ambition is to have a self supporting club capable of challenging in the top 2 tiers and that's the RIGHT way to go about it. If the man died tomorrow what would you expect from the football club? has anybody else been making noises about wanting to invest in Reading and having been rejected? Would I like him to dip into his own pocket and fund the purchase of 2-3 players? of course but it shouldn't be expected anymore then me asking you to fund a player signing.
by Bucks Dave » 08 Jan 2011 11:26
by Harpers So Solid Crew » 08 Jan 2011 11:45
under the tinStranded I love the fact that we are doing well, which we are this season to date, it's because the rest of the division is ropey and not that we might, just might, be doing things right for the here and now.
This is a truly mediocre division, and that is reflected every week in the results, which show that virtually any team in it can beat any other.
It is also highlighted in the points spread between 6th down to the lower end of the table.
by Victor Meldrew » 08 Jan 2011 11:53
ArchVictor Meldrew don't even think about promotion because the club doesn't want it.
That's what they were saying in 2005. It's excruciating reading this stuff.
Users browsing this forum: Biscuit goalie and 205 guests