kidderminster royal settle for a ppoint
This team was sent out looking for one.
by Svlad Cjelli » 12 Feb 2011 16:44
kidderminster royal settle for a ppoint
by ZacNaloen » 12 Feb 2011 16:48
Svlad Cjelli We're potentially "good" - but too inconsistent to be called that all the time.
by Svlad Cjelli » 12 Feb 2011 16:50
ZacNaloenSvlad Cjelli We're potentially "good" - but too inconsistent to be called that all the time.
The spine of the team is still very young. In reality the team won't be at it's best for two to three years.
by Hampshire Royal » 12 Feb 2011 16:50
by alderdude » 12 Feb 2011 16:51
by Jeffers217 » 12 Feb 2011 16:52
trueroyal1871Hampshire Royal I've never understood why, when people say that we're not very good (in spite of evidence to the contrary), they say that they're being realistic!!
We aren't very good though, we're ok nothing more than that and our current position in the table is probably about right. We've got potential to be a very good side depending on how players develop and who we bring in over the next couple of transfer windows.
by SLAMMED » 12 Feb 2011 16:52
Hampshire Royal So what's wrong with that? The bst team in our history has recently been dismantled, and instead of spending too much on the odd mercenary, we are attempting to plug gaps with our own youth, or with players who feel they have points to prove. In the middle of this transition period, we are comfortably in mid-table and with the very real prospect of our own youth players developing into something special. All this without mortgaging our soul.
Looks pretty good to me.
by alderdude » 12 Feb 2011 16:54
by Hampshire Royal » 12 Feb 2011 16:55
by Hoop Blah » 12 Feb 2011 16:55
ZacNaloenSvlad Cjelli We're potentially "good" - but too inconsistent to be called that all the time.
The spine of the team is still very young. In reality the team won't be at it's best for two to three years.
by SLAMMED » 12 Feb 2011 16:56
by Gordons Cumming » 12 Feb 2011 16:57
by Harpers So Solid Crew » 12 Feb 2011 16:57
SLAMMEDHampshire Royal So what's wrong with that? The bst team in our history has recently been dismantled, and instead of spending too much on the odd mercenary, we are attempting to plug gaps with our own youth, or with players who feel they have points to prove. In the middle of this transition period, we are comfortably in mid-table and with the very real prospect of our own youth players developing into something special. All this without mortgaging our soul.
Looks pretty good to me.
Good post.
by loyalroyaldaz » 12 Feb 2011 16:57
by Libertine » 12 Feb 2011 16:58
by Ian Royal » 12 Feb 2011 16:58
by ZacNaloen » 12 Feb 2011 16:59
Harpers So Solid CrewSLAMMEDHampshire Royal So what's wrong with that? The bst team in our history has recently been dismantled, and instead of spending too much on the odd mercenary, we are attempting to plug gaps with our own youth, or with players who feel they have points to prove. In the middle of this transition period, we are comfortably in mid-table and with the very real prospect of our own youth players developing into something special. All this without mortgaging our soul.
Looks pretty good to me.
Good post.
Trouble is that despite the two seasons in the Prem as a club and fans we have not got much as a legacy from it, as we spent the money on wages. Memories yes, but the club is not really any further advanced that the season we went up.
by Svlad Cjelli » 12 Feb 2011 17:01
by Man Friday » 12 Feb 2011 17:01
by RoyalJames101 » 12 Feb 2011 17:01
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 217 guests