Woodcote RoyalArch The teams in the top six have the points. They have better ppg and would be marginally expected to stay ahead. There's not much in it, but it's hard to justify the view that we're more likely to get into the playoffs than Forest or Leeds.
But surely when you put together the facts that, our game in hand is at home to the bottom club, we have a superior goal difference to all (I think) of our rivals and a rather easy run-in, any predictors of the top six come the end of the season would now include us.
Yesterday's results were hugely significant and even though we could still implode, it's the clubs who are improving (and we are doing so with a squad currently down to the bare bones but with all absentees expected back well before the end of the campaign) who will be most fancied to push on.
All neutrals will have us pencilled in for a place in the play offs and many will fancy us to finish higher than 6th.
Probabilities are strange and slippery things. Take the probability that we'll finish ahead of Forest. Setting aside some unlikely paths, we'd need three things: beat Preston at home, draw with or beat Forest, equal or better them in the other games. I'd agree with you that the probability of each of those things happening is greater than 0.5. But that doesn't mean the probability of all three happening is greater than 0.5. In fact if the probability of each is as high as 0.75 (which it isn't in any of the cases), the probability of all three is less than 0.5. Obviously, the whole story is more complicated (we could lose against Preston and Forest, for example, and still finish ahead) but the factors you reckon don't add up to greater probability for us over Forest, or over Leeds for that matter.