by Snowball » 13 Apr 2011 08:59
by Mr Angry » 13 Apr 2011 09:04
by Harpers So Solid Crew » 13 Apr 2011 09:05
by Snowball » 14 Apr 2011 11:39
Mr Angry Perspective.....ok, here's mine.
We simply aren't good enough to go up, and the reason is simple; we don't have enough quality in the striking department to score enough goals to win enough games;
people can quote as many statistics to say white is black, and black is white but the simple fact that
24 points out of a possible 45 at home, and a total of 8 clean sheets all season (and only 1 since
Christmas), is simply not good enough for a side to win promotion.
Last night a key indication as to the difference between the 2 sides was the 2 striker
substitutions which happened at the same time; Miller for QPR, Manset for us - one on
loan from Man City, the other a purchase from Hereford.
We don't have enough depth in the squad to cope if we lose a couple of key players through injury/suspension; what we give to able to afford Pascal Chimbonda, who, if he were at Reading, would be an automatic start - last night for QPR, he was on the bench.
However, we are still in with a shout of the play-offs, and if we do get there we will have momentum with us.
However, as much as I would love us to get into the play-offs, I can see us falling short;
thats not being negative, that's being realisitic given the squad we have.
by Mr Angry » 14 Apr 2011 14:05
by Snowball » 14 Apr 2011 17:06
Mr Angry Well done Snowball; I'm sure that makes you feel very superior.
I'm sure if I had the time to trawl through you 7000+ posts, I could find a few things that you have posted that may turn out to be rubbish (Like your assertion that Burnley would make the Play-offs for example), but frankly, I have better things to do with my time, and even if I could be bothered, I'd like to think that I wouldn't behave in quite such a smug, arrogant and charmless manner as you do.
by RoyalJames101 » 14 Apr 2011 17:18
SnowballMr Angry Perspective.....ok, here's mine.
We simply aren't good enough to go up, and the reason is simple; we don't have enough quality in the striking department to score enough goals to win enough games;
1 41 76 Goals Leeds
2 41 71 Goals Watford
3 41 70 Goals Reading
Better GD than Norwich (also scored 70). More goals and better GD than Cardiff, More goals than QPR, Leicester, Swansea
Second-best GD in the division, second only to QPR
people can quote as many statistics to say white is black, and black is white but the simple fact that
24 points out of a possible 45 at home, and a total of 8 clean sheets all season (and only 1 since
Christmas), is simply not good enough for a side to win promotion.
Its a marathon, not a sprint. Judge a season.Last night a key indication as to the difference between the 2 sides was the 2 striker
substitutions which happened at the same time; Miller for QPR, Manset for us - one on
loan from Man City, the other a purchase from Hereford.
11 Appearances 1 Goals Miller
06 Appearances 2 Goals Manset
That's a scoring rate four times better than Miller, so far.
We don't have enough depth in the squad to cope if we lose a couple of key players through injury/suspension; what we give to able to afford Pascal Chimbonda, who, if he were at Reading, would be an automatic start - last night for QPR, he was on the bench.
Turns out it's been the SQUAD that made the difference. Cummings, Gunnar, McCarthy, Tabb, Howard, Ingi, Karacan at left-back.
The squad players have been terrific.However, we are still in with a shout of the play-offs, and if we do get there we will have momentum with us.
correctHowever, as much as I would love us to get into the play-offs, I can see us falling short;
thats not being negative, that's being realisitic given the squad we have.
by MmmMonsterMunch » 14 Apr 2011 17:23
by seahawk10 » 14 Apr 2011 19:28
seahawk10 Five game winning streak coming. You heard it here first.
by Z175 » 14 Apr 2011 19:40
by Snowball » 14 Apr 2011 20:32
seahawk10seahawk10 Five game winning streak coming. You heard it here first.
I would like to apologize for not predicting our winning streak more accurately. (4th post on this thread)
by Snowball » 15 Apr 2011 10:50
by chilipepper91 » 15 Apr 2011 11:05
Snowball Looking at Ipswich's last 14 games (since Jewell came in and got his first league win)
Excluding the game against us, they have been playing promotion football
P14 W8 D3 L3 27-17 27 Points from 14 = 1.93 ppg = 89 Point Season
So our 3-1 win there was more than a bit special.
Even including their defeat by us they are:
P15 W8 D3 L4 28-20 27 Points from 15 = 1.80 ppg = 83 Point Season
H 3-2 Doncaster
A 2-1 Derby
H 3-0 Sheffield Utd
A 1-1 Barnsley
A 6-0 Doncaster
H 1-1 Hull
A 0-2 QPR
H 0-2 Portsmouth
A 2-0 Cardiff
H 1-3 Reading
A 0-0 Leeds
H 0-3 Watford
H 2-0 Scunthorpe
A 2-1 Burnley
H 2-1 Crystal Palace
H 3-3 Middlesbrough
by Svlad Cjelli » 15 Apr 2011 11:14
chilipepper91 Let's casually avoid the fact that Portsmouth and Watford also won there in adjacent home games (Watford by a better margin), and that win came during a period of only 1 win in 7. I wouldn't say it was "more than a bit special", because otherwise Watford's would be... miraculous?
by Snowball » 15 Apr 2011 11:22
by RoyalJames101 » 15 Apr 2011 11:31
Snowball Why does it matter who else won there or who didn't?
Their overall form is excellent in terms of points per game and we went there and did very well.
Is there part of the statistics you consider to be incorrect?
Strangely, I don't give a monkeys what Watford or Portsmouth are doing.
by Mr Angry » 15 Apr 2011 11:49
RoyalJames101Snowball Why does it matter who else won there or who didn't?
Their overall form is excellent in terms of points per game and we went there and did very well.
Is there part of the statistics you consider to be incorrect?
Strangely, I don't give a monkeys what Watford or Portsmouth are doing.
Why Ipswich then?
by Snowball » 15 Apr 2011 11:52
RoyalJames101Snowball Why does it matter who else won there or who didn't?
Their overall form is excellent in terms of points per game and we went there and did very well.
Is there part of the statistics you consider to be incorrect?
Strangely, I don't give a monkeys what Watford or Portsmouth are doing.
Why Ipswich then?
by Snowball » 15 Apr 2011 12:36
by Maguire » 15 Apr 2011 12:37
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 218 guests