by Royal Rother » 25 Apr 2011 22:12
by RoyalJames101 » 25 Apr 2011 22:21
Snowball
ALL FOUR DEFEATS WERE WITHOUT L-WOOD PLAYING. WITH HIM PLAYING WE REMAIN UNDEFEATED IN THE LEAGUE.
by MmmMonsterMunch » 25 Apr 2011 22:26
by PEARCEY » 25 Apr 2011 22:47
MmmMonsterMunch Can't this thread be closed now? Embarrassing.....
by Mr. Reading » 25 Apr 2011 22:54
by blueroyals » 25 Apr 2011 22:58
by PEARCEY » 25 Apr 2011 23:02
blueroyals left it too late for a points deduction now surely - how would the appeals process work with the play-offs just around the corner?
imagine the club in 3rd position will sue a la Sheffield Utd
by Wizard » 26 Apr 2011 00:21
Mr. Reading Two minds about this - one part of me wants the book thrown at them, simply for the hilarity, the other part doesn't want them in the playoffs if that's where the punishment puts them!
by Silver Fox » 26 Apr 2011 10:06
by Snowball » 26 Apr 2011 10:39
Silver Fox The correct answer to all of this is that QPR are denied promotion and the 18th placed premiership team don't get relegated. Any appeal will then have no bearing on playoffs and can be settled before fixture lists are finalised.
by Snowball » 26 Apr 2011 10:55
by brendywendy » 26 Apr 2011 10:59
by Terminal Boardom » 26 Apr 2011 10:59
Snowball Just realised something.
As the table stands now, if QPR are relegated for these offences
they save Sheffield United from relegation
What goes around, comes around...?
by brendywendy » 26 Apr 2011 11:00
by ZacNaloen » 26 Apr 2011 11:01
by Silver Fox » 26 Apr 2011 11:02
Terminal BoardomSnowball Just realised something.
As the table stands now, if QPR are relegated for these offences
they save Sheffield United from relegation
What goes around, comes around...?
QPR will not be relegated to League 1. There is no precedent for that.
by Svlad Cjelli » 26 Apr 2011 13:53
Silver FoxTerminal BoardomSnowball Just realised something.
As the table stands now, if QPR are relegated for these offences
they save Sheffield United from relegation
What goes around, comes around...?
QPR will not be relegated to League 1. There is no precedent for that.
Swindon?
by facaldaqui » 26 Apr 2011 14:46
Mr. Reading Two minds about this - one part of me wants the book thrown at them, simply for the hilarity, the other part doesn't want them in the playoffs if that's where the punishment puts them!
by KC Royal » 26 Apr 2011 14:47
Snowball Why such fear of Swansea?
In the home game we had 51% possession (surprises me since Swansea have a lot of tippy-tappy possession)
and we had more shots (9 to their 7) 3-5 on target. We were done by a good goal from Swansea's POV
but I thought our defence dealt poorly with Sinclair's break from midfield.
In the away game we only had 45% possession, and though the stats say they had 11 shots on target,
if my memory serves me right most were the same kind of shot, a half opening about 18-20 yards out
and shots that were fairly comfortable for Federici.
Church also missed an absolute sitter two yards out after Long headed down to him
and missed a more difficult, but clear heading chance.
They are clearly NOT as good as back then, on a poor run of form, crap away from home.
We are on a fantastic run of form. We had two single-goal defeats in FEBRUARY, a late-ish goal by QPR
and a 94th minute goal at Norwich where we played with ten men for 39 minutes and conceded in the 94th minute.
ALL FOUR DEFEATS WERE WITHOUT L-WOOD PLAYING. WITH HIM PLAYING WE REMAIN UNDEFEATED IN THE LEAGUE.
by Silver Fox » 26 Apr 2011 15:09
Svlad CjelliSilver Fox Swindon?
Completely different set of offences.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 227 guests