Snowball 10-2-3-5 = 20
That = 0
by SLAMMED » 17 Apr 2011 02:06
Snowball 10-2-3-5 = 20
by Son of Len » 17 Apr 2011 05:06
jonnyroyal1871 That, isn't statistics, thats probabilities.....
by Royal With Cheese » 17 Apr 2011 12:12
by PEARCEY » 17 Apr 2011 12:17
by Wimb » 17 Apr 2011 12:23
jonnyroyal1871 Ok, I was bored and should have been doing other things - but for some unknown reason have just read all of this thread, and I am going to come at this argument from a different perspective.
The STATISTICS oft quoted in this thread are actually pretty irrelevant, and oddly enough, with only the occasional exception, most of what people have contributed to this thread makes sense in one form or another.
Lets look at a few things...As you seem to want to refuse to acknowledge, TROLI was advocating Long was RESTED after an 'average' start to the season. A sensible argument, based on a) our form at the time, and b) his 'average' success at the goalscoring side of his game. He didn't suggest he should be taken outside and shot.......
Next, as Long came to us untried to all intense and purposes, Snowball, you couldn't sensibly have become an advocate of the potential success of Long as a goalscorer without having seen him do what he had done over a couple of seasons, which was pick up a decent record given a lack of starting opportunities, and the scoring of a number of vital goals with the game time he had.
It is a KNOWN quantity that the coaching staff were unsure of Longs potential when he first came, and it has been told to me first hand by a senior staff member that he was a makeweight in the Doyle deal, a friendly face away from home for the first time. His fee, and wages were cheap, and he was a punt.
Its all too easy to bang the drum with some prior knowledge that in all probability, given a system that suited, a decent run in the team, fitness being as it should, he would score goals, to add to the never disputed other assets to his game.
This ain't statistics, its plain common sense.
BMD took a risk, he had nurtured Long, but had few other options, with Nhunt injured, and Church not especially prolific at any point in his career.
Hey, its worked out, big time, and nobody is more pleased than me, and every other Royal, but there was a reasonable chance it would work out this way - so well done for being right, but your lack of grace, and lack of acceptance that it was a calculated choice, and few other options were available.
Also, your championing of Harte is not rocket science either, that was shrewd business based on all known form, fit and taking free kicks he would score goals, he always has, at every level.
I don't doubt you are a reasonable judge, I just think you are playing a % game, and in doing so, will naturally be right more than you will be wrong.
That, isn't statistics, thats probabilities.....
by Snowball » 17 Apr 2011 15:13
by Snowball » 17 Apr 2011 15:28
by KC Royal » 17 Apr 2011 18:50
Snowball
Let me get this right. We might have done BETTER than Long 22, Hunt 8, Church 5, Manset 2 (with 6 games to play)?
It looks extremely likely that our top-four scorers' total this season
will be second only to the brilliant 05/06 106-point season
22-19-15-10 = 66 2005-06
20-12-12-09 = 53 2009-10
22-09-08-08 = 47 2010-11 (With six games still to play)
18-13-09-07 = 47 2008-09
19-09-06-05 = 39 2004-05
14-11-09-05 = 39 2003-04
16-09-09-04 = 38 2002-04
14-13-04-04 = 35 2006-07
10-06-06-06 = 28 2007-08
McDermot's choices have got us to 5th, on a great run, good chance of automatic, odds-on for the POs at
least and by far the form side in the POs. He has also got Shane's value up to 4-7 Million and rejuvenated
Hunt. Even Churchy has got 5 goals and seems to be coming back to the player he was last season.
And, BTW this season Church has started 13 League games (no goals) and been sub 22 times (5 goals)
It's not as if he's been out in the cold. He HAS had plenty of chances
To put that in perspective, Shane Long had 17 League starts in his first three seasons
by Snowball » 17 Apr 2011 19:55
KC Royal
Haven't checked this thread for a while and can't believe i'm being pedantic enough to check my initial suspicions, but Church actually scored 13 last season. Thats from soccerbase before you ask. I think our top 4 scorers will prob now finish around the same as last season, i'm hoping that Hunt and Kebe both get double figures before the season is out.
by Harpers So Solid Crew » 17 Apr 2011 20:06
by Snowball » 17 Apr 2011 23:18
by Ian Royal » 17 Apr 2011 23:19
by Snowball » 17 Apr 2011 23:22
by KC Royal » 19 Apr 2011 19:10
Harpers So Solid Crew Soccerbase includes one for Wales.
by Snowball » 10 May 2011 07:41
T.R.O.L.I. Would have added this to the original thread but it appears to have been locked.
Another game, another two points spaffed away due to Long's inability to hit the target. His workrate up to the 18 yard line is unquestionable and often is performing a thankless task, however he is first a foremost a striker and a striker's ultimate role is to score goals.
It appears the cliched nickname of "Jigsaw" is currently the most accurate summation of his efforts this season in front of goal - 4 goals in 19 league games is atrocious (especially when 3 of those goals were from the penalty spot) for the "number one striker" at any football club.
No doubt Snowball will be all over this thread like a rash stating how Long is actually not going through a bad patch and that he's actually in good form, but the biggest thing for me is the number of points we have failed to pick up recently due to Long's poor finishing. He's missed glorious chances against Cardiff, Norwich, Watford and now Coventry and, as 2-0 alludes to on another thread, it looks more and more like we are going to have to settle for a season of mid table mediocrity.
Time for a change? Well, I certainly think so and I'd venture I'm not in the minority. Whether Brian McDermott agrees remains to be seen but I'm sure there's many a Reading fan that is hoping that Santa brings them an early Christmas present - that being Shane Long being dropped to the bench at Pride Park next Saturday.
by readingbedding » 17 May 2011 23:04
by Ian Royal » 17 May 2011 23:09
by Snowball » 18 May 2011 01:07
by Harpers So Solid Crew » 18 May 2011 08:37
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Starry Blue Hooped Wonder and 210 guests