by Mike Hunt » 19 May 2011 14:15
by Snowball » 19 May 2011 14:57
by Uke » 19 May 2011 15:01
by Svlad Cjelli » 19 May 2011 15:02
Snowball Lot and lots of numbers
by ZacNaloen » 19 May 2011 15:06
by Snowball » 19 May 2011 15:06
by Snowball » 19 May 2011 15:08
by ZacNaloen » 19 May 2011 15:09
by Snowball » 19 May 2011 16:19
by KC Royal » 19 May 2011 19:25
Svlad CjelliSnowball Lot and lots of numbers
But the stats in isolation don't show the real story as it progressed - for instance Mills was brought in by BR, and was his favourite, then was dropped when he fell out with BR and criticised his methods.
The bare stats of comparing his appearances won't reflect that change in attitude at all.
by zummerset » 19 May 2011 19:28
by ZacNaloen » 19 May 2011 19:34
Snowball Disagree
by Blue_White_Blood » 19 May 2011 20:00
Royal Rother On 2 occasions on Tuesday he spoke about "we" and "us" when referring to Reading.
I wonder what Swansea fans thought about that!
by MmmMonsterMunch » 19 May 2011 20:12
by Snowball » 19 May 2011 21:47
ZacNaloenSnowball Disagree
It's your perogative but Long really wasn't fit until Rodgers had already gone and he was first choice up til he got injured
by madstadblues » 19 May 2011 22:14
by Gav » 19 May 2011 22:43
by DOYLERSAROYALER » 19 May 2011 22:46
Snowball So who did Rodgers Play or Dump
and what did McDermot change?
There were HUGE changes. Long played 3.7 times more minutes under McDermott, Mills and Gunnarson 3.6 times,
Gylfi 2.6 times, McAnuff 2.5 times, Kebe 2.2, Howard 1.8
There were 1.4 times as many minutes to be played under McDermot but all the above were more in favour with Mac than Rogers
Griffin and Kishnavilli were brought in
Look at Long as a prime example. Barely played under Rodgers and, despite a four-match ban played 1,732 minutes for McDermot
Minutes Played Under Managers, Percentage of Possible
Rodgers . . . . . . . McDermot
0000 00.00% . . . 2178 76.42% . . . 76.42% Max Griff
0000 00.00% . . . 1075 37.72% . . . 37.72% Max Kish
0472 22.80% . . . 1732 70.41% . . . 47.60% 3.7 Long
0547 26.43% . . . 1992 69.89% . . . 43.47% 3.6 Mills
0400 19.32% . . . 1431 50.21% . . . 30.89% 3.6 Gunn
0872 42.13% . . . 2247 78.84% . . . 36.72% 2.6 Gylf
1037 50.10% . . . 2605 91.40% . . . 41.31% 2.5 McAf
0925 44.69% . . . 2080 72.98% . . . 28.30% 2.2 Kebe
1000 48.31% . . . 1815 63.68% . . . 15.38% 1.8 How'd
1641 79.28% . . . 2850 99.99% . . . 20.72% 1.7 Bert
1080 52.17% . . . 1769 62.07% . . . 09.90% 1.6 Ingi
0932 45.02% . . . 1479 51.89% . . . 06.87% 1.6 Chch
1890 91.30% . . . 2829 99.26% . . . 07.96% 1.5 Feds
1058 51.11% . . . 1110 38.95% . . . -12.16% 1.0 Kar'n
0901 43.53% . . . 0836 29.33% . . . -14.19% 0.9 Ras'k
1034 49.95% . . . 0946 33.19% . . . -16.76% 0.9 Tabb
0800 38.65% . . . 0492 17.26% . . . -21.38% 0.6 Ciss
1440 69.57% . . . 0737 25.86% . . . -43.71% 0.5 Pear
0898 43.38% . . . 0312 10.95% . . . -32.43% 0.3 Mat'y
0461 22.27% . . . 0119 04.18% . . . -18.10% 0.3 HRK
0810 39.13% . . . 0000 00.00% . . . -39.13% 0.0 Cummings
0677 32.71% . . . 0000 00.00% . . . -32.71% 0.0 Odea
0450 21.74% . . . 0000 00.00% . . . -21.74% 0.0 Rosy
0488 23.57% . . . 0000 00.00% . . . -23.57% 0.0 Hunt
0248 11.98% . . . 0000 00.00% . . . -11.98% 0.0 Davies
0034 01.64% . . . 0000 00.00% . . . -01.64% 0.0 Harper
by Ian Royal » 19 May 2011 22:57
ZacNaloen LONG WAS INJURED FOR 90%* OF RODGERS TIME AT THE CLUB DURING THE SEASON.
Fact is Rodgers is correct, he did try to bring him in.
The Ankle injury put Long out for ages though, and he wasn't really fully fit until Mcdermott got in. Which is why Church played more minutes.
*probably
by Snowball » 20 May 2011 07:04
DOYLERSAROYALERSnowball So who did Rodgers Play or Dump
and what did McDermot change?
There were HUGE changes. Long played 3.7 times more minutes under McDermott, Mills and Gunnarson 3.6 times,
Gylfi 2.6 times, McAnuff 2.5 times, Kebe 2.2, Howard 1.8
There were 1.4 times as many minutes to be played under McDermot but all the above were more in favour with Mac than Rogers
Griffin and Kishnavilli were brought in
Look at Long as a prime example. Barely played under Rodgers and, despite a four-match ban played 1,732 minutes for McDermot
Minutes Played Under Managers, Percentage of Possible
Rodgers . . . . . . . McDermot
0000 00.00% . . . 2178 76.42% . . . 76.42% Max Griff
0000 00.00% . . . 1075 37.72% . . . 37.72% Max Kish
0472 22.80% . . . 1732 70.41% . . . 47.60% 3.7 Long
0547 26.43% . . . 1992 69.89% . . . 43.47% 3.6 Mills
0400 19.32% . . . 1431 50.21% . . . 30.89% 3.6 Gunn
0872 42.13% . . . 2247 78.84% . . . 36.72% 2.6 Gylf
1037 50.10% . . . 2605 91.40% . . . 41.31% 2.5 McAf
0925 44.69% . . . 2080 72.98% . . . 28.30% 2.2 Kebe
1000 48.31% . . . 1815 63.68% . . . 15.38% 1.8 How'd
1641 79.28% . . . 2850 99.99% . . . 20.72% 1.7 Bert
1080 52.17% . . . 1769 62.07% . . . 09.90% 1.6 Ingi
0932 45.02% . . . 1479 51.89% . . . 06.87% 1.6 Chch
1890 91.30% . . . 2829 99.26% . . . 07.96% 1.5 Feds
1058 51.11% . . . 1110 38.95% . . . -12.16% 1.0 Kar'n
0901 43.53% . . . 0836 29.33% . . . -14.19% 0.9 Ras'k
1034 49.95% . . . 0946 33.19% . . . -16.76% 0.9 Tabb
0800 38.65% . . . 0492 17.26% . . . -21.38% 0.6 Ciss
1440 69.57% . . . 0737 25.86% . . . -43.71% 0.5 Pear
0898 43.38% . . . 0312 10.95% . . . -32.43% 0.3 Mat'y
0461 22.27% . . . 0119 04.18% . . . -18.10% 0.3 HRK
0810 39.13% . . . 0000 00.00% . . . -39.13% 0.0 Cummings
0677 32.71% . . . 0000 00.00% . . . -32.71% 0.0 Odea
0450 21.74% . . . 0000 00.00% . . . -21.74% 0.0 Rosy
0488 23.57% . . . 0000 00.00% . . . -23.57% 0.0 Hunt
0248 11.98% . . . 0000 00.00% . . . -11.98% 0.0 Davies
0034 01.64% . . . 0000 00.00% . . . -01.64% 0.0 Harper
Snowball - you really need to get out more often .........