FAO Daytrippers

403 posts
westendgirl
Member
Posts: 365
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:58

Re: FAO Daytrippers

by westendgirl » 01 Jun 2011 08:37

Avon Royal It's a pity that some people on this thread don't put as much energy into supporting the team as they do into defending their right to sit in silence. :wink:


The posts that have been the most sensible are not those defending the right to be silent but the responsibility of thinking of others - so those who insisted on standing despite requests to sit some of the time and those who asked Radidbee to sit when he was only standing at exciting times are both intolerant.

I constantly have this arguement with my mother who goes to every away game but cannot physically stand all game and takes too long to stand up that when all around her stand the action is over by the time she gets to her feet. At Liverpool she was suffering with a cracked pelvis but still went despite the snow and now comments that at least it was on the box to be recorded so she could see the bits she missed (the best action of course). She tries to get a seat where it won't matter but it is not always easy. She first went to see Reading in the 1940s so I think she can out loyal some of the swearers but she needs to allow some standing just as the standers should allow her to see some of the game.

User avatar
Schards#2
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 4198
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 13:46
Location: Wildest Wiltshire

Re: FAO Daytrippers

by Schards#2 » 01 Jun 2011 08:53

westendgirl
Avon Royal It's a pity that some people on this thread don't put as much energy into supporting the team as they do into defending their right to sit in silence. :wink:


The posts that have been the most sensible are not those defending the right to be silent but the responsibility of thinking of others - so those who insisted on standing despite requests to sit some of the time and those who asked Radidbee to sit when he was only standing at exciting times are both intolerant.

I constantly have this arguement with my mother who goes to every away game but cannot physically stand all game and takes too long to stand up that when all around her stand the action is over by the time she gets to her feet. At Liverpool she was suffering with a cracked pelvis but still went despite the snow and now comments that at least it was on the box to be recorded so she could see the bits she missed (the best action of course). She tries to get a seat where it won't matter but it is not always easy. She first went to see Reading in the 1940s so I think she can out loyal some of the swearers but she needs to allow some standing just as the standers should allow her to see some of the game.


This sums up my views quite nicely. You have to be pretty ignorant to totally disregard the needs of the old and the young who, simply, will not see the game if people stand up throughout.

My dad's been going since the sixties but can't stand up for 90 minutes and i've been taking my children since they were 5. Neither have a hope of seeing much if everyone stands up and they have as much right to be there as anyone else. To be told 'it's football, if you don't like it f**k off' isn't good enough really.

Saying that, I can understand regular fans being hacked off that their experience is being compromised by people who only go to the big occassions and insist on everyone watching on their terms.

No real solutions, the best you can do is try and buy a seat that is most likely to suit your requirements. For Monday, I went upper tier as it's steeply banked and I thought most people would stand in the lower tier. At other times, with the children, I've tried to get tickets near the front so there are fewer potential standers in front of us. Likewise, the standers should try, where possible, to book seats at the back where standing won't impede others view. It's a shame the club can't offer this as a solution but, presumably, it would be seen as condoning standing which is, technically, not permitted.

I have to say, however, it is extremely irritating to have 3 standers near the front where everyone else is happy sitting and their not giving a toss about the thoughts of the majority whose view they are ruining for their own gratification.

User avatar
LUX
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 13399
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:38
Location: Keep this frequency clear

Re: FAO Daytrippers

by LUX » 01 Jun 2011 08:57

good post Schards

Why don't you make sensible posts on the politics thread?


(er, :wink: )

Forbury Lion
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 9168
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 08:37
Location: https://youtu.be/c4sX57ZUhzc

Re: FAO Daytrippers

by Forbury Lion » 01 Jun 2011 09:01

Nothing worse than someone in front of you standing, particularly a steward who tells you no to stand when all you can see is the back of their yellow jacket.

User avatar
Uke
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 23174
Joined: 17 Apr 2004 16:24
Location: Слава Україні! Героям слава! @UkeRFC

Re: FAO Daytrippers

by Uke » 01 Jun 2011 09:07

Schards#2 To be told 'it's all about me, if you don't like it f**k off' isn't good enough really.


Nice post Schards,

Just needed to correct one sentence though ;)


User avatar
Matt de K
Member
Posts: 835
Joined: 18 Apr 2004 09:14
Location: Bournemouth

Re: FAO Daytrippers

by Matt de K » 01 Jun 2011 09:15

Schards#2 This sums up my views quite nicely. You have to be pretty ignorant to totally disregard the needs of the old and the young who, simply, will not see the game if people stand up throughout.

My dad's been going since the sixties but can't stand up for 90 minutes and i've been taking my children since they were 5. Neither have a hope of seeing much if everyone stands up and they have as much right to be there as anyone else. To be told 'it's football, if you don't like it f**k off' isn't good enough really.

Saying that, I can understand regular fans being hacked off that their experience is being compromised by people who only go to the big occassions and insist on everyone watching on their terms.

No real solutions, the best you can do is try and buy a seat that is most likely to suit your requirements. For Monday, I went upper tier as it's steeply banked and I thought most people would stand in the lower tier. At other times, with the children, I've tried to get tickets near the front so there are fewer potential standers in front of us. Likewise, the standers should try, where possible, to book seats at the back where standing won't impede others view. It's a shame the club can't offer this as a solution but, presumably, it would be seen as condoning standing which is, technically, not permitted.

I have to say, however, it is extremely irritating to have 3 standers near the front where everyone else is happy sitting and their not giving a toss about the thoughts of the majority whose view they are ruining for their own gratification.


Good post Schards.

I stood when everyone was standing - then I watched the people eventually sit down from the front row, which filtered all the way back to us (apart from Royalblue, who aggravated a few people). I sat down, even though I would have liked to stand up all the way through, as I knew I had a family sat behind me (all of whom were singing and making noise) which had 2 kids, and I would have definitely blocked their views .

I guess it's all down to how considerate you are of your surrounding people!!! Obviously some are much, much less considerate than others on here!!

But at the end of this I think that if the whole stand is standing then fair enough - every one has to stand. But if only a couple of people are standing, then these people are instigating hassle - not atmosphere

User avatar
paultheroyal
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 12837
Joined: 04 Mar 2005 12:59
Location: Hob Nob Reality TV Champ 2010/2011

Re: FAO Daytrippers

by paultheroyal » 01 Jun 2011 09:17

Schards spot on and no probs in 547 other than stewards wanting swearing stamped out which is fair enough.

User avatar
Royal Lady
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 13760
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 10:17
Location: Don't mess with "my sort". Cheers then.

Re: FAO Daytrippers

by Royal Lady » 01 Jun 2011 09:22

There were four blokes sat in front of us aged around mid 20's to 30s. They were sat the whole time, didn't sing, didn't even notice them get excited after we'd scored (though I wasn't really looking at them) - they did, however, keep turning round when I was singing and shouting encouragement. :roll: If we ever get to Wembley again, may I suggest that all these non-die hard RFC "fans" get their seats at the back of the upper tiers. Cheers then.

User avatar
bigmike
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1497
Joined: 23 Sep 2004 00:33

Re: FAO Daytrippers

by bigmike » 01 Jun 2011 09:23

1TeamInBerksRFC
Look Im a Reading Fan i be a season ticket Holder for 30 years so be quiet i am no wind up person


so you are at least 30 years old and you cannot form a simple sentence?

What school were you educated ?

I ask this so that we can make sure that no more children are subjected to such a poor standard of education


Lydia Dustbin
Member
Posts: 75
Joined: 02 Jun 2004 14:31
Location: melton keyns

Re: FAO Daytrippers

by Lydia Dustbin » 01 Jun 2011 09:27

I had a lovely day out and enjoyed the occasion but not the result.

User avatar
Royal Rother
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 21836
Joined: 13 Apr 2004 23:22
Location: The handsome bald fella with the blue eyes

Re: FAO Daytrippers

by Royal Rother » 01 Jun 2011 09:30

A 3.5 year gap, and all you can offer up is one measly sentence!! :wink:

User avatar
LUX
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 13399
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:38
Location: Keep this frequency clear

Re: FAO Daytrippers

by LUX » 01 Jun 2011 09:37

pretty good user name, though.

Is that one of yours, Red?

Lydia Dustbin
Member
Posts: 75
Joined: 02 Jun 2004 14:31
Location: melton keyns

Re: FAO Daytrippers

by Lydia Dustbin » 01 Jun 2011 09:39

I joined 7 years ago so a posting every 3.5 years is normal for me. No I am not Red but thanks for the compliment on my user name.

I'm looking forward to next season and maybe another trip to Wembley, who knows?


User avatar
manny96
Member
Posts: 522
Joined: 06 Feb 2011 20:20
Location: The best thing since sliced perineum.

Re: FAO Daytrippers

by manny96 » 01 Jun 2011 09:46

Matt de K
I sat down, even though I would have liked to stand up all the way through, as I knew I had a family sat behind me (all of whom were singing and making noise) which had 2 kids, and I would have definitely blocked their views .


Same for me here. I think I actually apologised in advanced to those around me when I arrived - particularly because of the two tiny kids behind me. Don't think I was too bad. I'm pretty foul-mouthed anyway, so I imagine my language was fairly civilised.

User avatar
Red
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1288
Joined: 11 Jun 2010 22:23

Re: FAO Daytrippers

by Red » 01 Jun 2011 09:46

LUX pretty good user name, though.

Is that one of yours, Red?

lol - I wish it was tbf.

Toon Toon Blue army
Member
Posts: 712
Joined: 24 Feb 2005 16:37

Re: FAO Daytrippers

by Toon Toon Blue army » 01 Jun 2011 10:02

I don't really get the whole some people can't physically stand up etc etc.

Surely if you had a problem which prevented you from standing you would be eligible to get seats in the disabled section?

User avatar
Svlad Cjelli
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 4605
Joined: 14 May 2008 09:25
Location: It's the Premier LEAGUE, you cretins. The Premiership hasn't existed for years.

Re: FAO Daytrippers

by Svlad Cjelli » 01 Jun 2011 10:05

Toon Toon Blue army I don't really get the whole some people can't physically stand up etc etc.

Surely if you had a problem which prevented you from standing you would be eligible to get seats in the disabled section?


If that were true stadia would require thousands more disabled seats. They have way too few already, but there's lots of difference between having trouble standing for long periods of time and being eligible as "disabled".

User avatar
Royal Lady
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 13760
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 10:17
Location: Don't mess with "my sort". Cheers then.

Re: FAO Daytrippers

by Royal Lady » 01 Jun 2011 10:07

Toon Toon Blue army I don't really get the whole some people can't physically stand up etc etc.

Surely if you had a problem which prevented you from standing you would be eligible to get seats in the disabled section?

Are you as sympathetic to people in "real life". Imagine that you're, say, 76 years old, in fairly good health, but find standing for long periods of time painful. Do you think you should be classed as disabled? Or do you think that, maybe, you'd like to sit for the game? God help you when you're older.

User avatar
Uke
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 23174
Joined: 17 Apr 2004 16:24
Location: Слава Україні! Героям слава! @UkeRFC

Re: FAO Daytrippers

by Uke » 01 Jun 2011 10:11

Toon Toon Blue army I don't really get the whole some people can't physically stand up etc etc.


They can stand up

Not quickly

Think of your grandparents

You'll also know sooner than you think...

User avatar
Svlad Cjelli
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 4605
Joined: 14 May 2008 09:25
Location: It's the Premier LEAGUE, you cretins. The Premiership hasn't existed for years.

Re: FAO Daytrippers

by Svlad Cjelli » 01 Jun 2011 10:14

Royal Lady
Toon Toon Blue army I don't really get the whole some people can't physically stand up etc etc.

Surely if you had a problem which prevented you from standing you would be eligible to get seats in the disabled section?

Are you as sympathetic to people in "real life". Imagine that you're, say, 76 years old, in fairly good health, but find standing for long periods of time painful. Do you think you should be classed as disabled? Or do you think that, maybe, you'd like to sit for the game? God help you when you're older.


But the other side of the coin is that for many people the bobbing up and down every few minutes is the worst possible situation.

But that's what the current regulations, where standing "at times of excitement" is allowed and it's only "persistent standing" that's not are utterly ludicrous.

As pointed out a few pages back, every single argument here supports safe-standing areas, where those who want to stand and those who want to sit are in separate areas and everyone is happy.

403 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: WestYorksRoyal and 217 guests

It is currently 26 Nov 2024 07:26