by Archie's penalty » 07 Jul 2011 19:31
by Ian Royal » 07 Jul 2011 19:34
sandman So she's right then. You don't have any facts about Mills' behaviour just stories from other parties.
by sandman » 07 Jul 2011 19:35
Royal Lady I'd be interested in some examples of Mills being "gobby" btw - I think it's a complete myth. All this "he thinks he's better than he is" etc - I've NEVER seen any evidence of it.
by loyalroyal4life » 07 Jul 2011 19:41
FiNeRaIn 5 million in for mills, 250k to be spent on a replacement.
by leicsRoyal » 07 Jul 2011 19:43
loyalroyal4lifeFiNeRaIn 5 million in for mills, 250k to be spent on a replacement.
Well it is the reading way! I for one wanted Mills to stay but for him to want to sign on for leicester says it all. Happy for him to jog on and take his 25k a week
Just happy when this is all done now, its getting boring!
You never know he might reject leicester
by RoyalBlue » 07 Jul 2011 19:47
by Woodcote Royal » 07 Jul 2011 19:51
FiNeRaIn 5 million in for mills, 250k to be spent on a replacement.
by under the tin » 07 Jul 2011 19:52
by PEARCEY » 07 Jul 2011 19:54
by Bandini » 07 Jul 2011 19:59
under the tin
What it does demonstrate, however; is a declaration of intent by that football club.
by sandman » 07 Jul 2011 20:06
Bandiniunder the tin
What it does demonstrate, however; is a declaration of intent by that football club.
The only intent that they are declaring with this particular purchase is that they intend to over pay for reasonable but not that good players on the basis of their performances on TV in the big games.
by under the tin » 07 Jul 2011 20:15
Bandiniunder the tin
What it does demonstrate, however; is a declaration of intent by that football club.
The only intent that they are declaring with this particular purchase is that they intend to over pay for reasonable but not that good players on the basis of their performances on TV in the big games.
by leicsRoyal » 07 Jul 2011 20:15
by Bandini » 07 Jul 2011 20:18
under the tinBandiniunder the tin
What it does demonstrate, however; is a declaration of intent by that football club.
The only intent that they are declaring with this particular purchase is that they intend to over pay for reasonable but not that good players on the basis of their performances on TV in the big games.
That's your opinion, mate.
The point I was making was that those games are more likely to be sold out (even if on telly) as a consequence of that declaration of intent.
More seats sold + more corporate money = less requirement on quality player sales to balance the books.
by Ferris » 07 Jul 2011 20:18
by andrew1957 » 07 Jul 2011 20:18
by mad79 » 07 Jul 2011 20:26
by Kitsondinho » 07 Jul 2011 20:29
by The Prisoner » 07 Jul 2011 20:31
@Adamfederici85 ask millsy why he's leaving for a worse team?!
by fester_royal » 07 Jul 2011 20:32
Users browsing this forum: Dirk Gently, Mid Sussex Royal, RoyalBlue, Royals and Racers and 220 guests