by rhroyal » 17 Jul 2011 12:56
by Rev Algenon Stickleback H » 17 Jul 2011 14:15
rhroyal I think the board appears to have more STGs because, very often, they are more outspoken. .
by Man Friday » 17 Jul 2011 14:30
by Royalee » 17 Jul 2011 15:28
by Ian Royal » 17 Jul 2011 15:29
Royalee Where's the option for 'having a balanced opinion and not having to have the blinkers on constantly'?
by Man Friday » 18 Jul 2011 08:29
by brendywendy » 18 Jul 2011 09:57
Royalee Where's the option for 'having a balanced opinion and not having to have the blinkers on constantly'?
by brendywendy » 18 Jul 2011 09:59
Man Friday That the last ten years have not been successful, great, etc (especially by the standards of the first 125 years) is beyond dispute. I just think that, at some time in the future, SJM will screw this club. I have no faith in anyone these days (Met Police, etc, etc). That's why I'm an STG.
by Z175 » 18 Jul 2011 11:24
by brendywendy » 18 Jul 2011 11:28
by Man Friday » 18 Jul 2011 12:58
brendywendyMan Friday That the last ten years have not been successful, great, etc (especially by the standards of the first 125 years) is beyond dispute. I just think that, at some time in the future, SJM will screw this club. I have no faith in anyone these days (Met Police, etc, etc). That's why I'm an STG.
i just dont see this. based on what? is that just based on the fact that people are generally corruptable, and untrustworthy? or something he specifically has done?
by Svlad Cjelli » 18 Jul 2011 13:04
Man FridaybrendywendyMan Friday That the last ten years have not been successful, great, etc (especially by the standards of the first 125 years) is beyond dispute. I just think that, at some time in the future, SJM will screw this club. I have no faith in anyone these days (Met Police, etc, etc). That's why I'm an STG.
i just dont see this. based on what? is that just based on the fact that people are generally corruptable, and untrustworthy? or something he specifically has done?
The former. (Plus I'd be less suspicious if he came out and said the loans he gave the club aren't really loans, they're donations ala a benefactor.)
by Royalee » 18 Jul 2011 13:19
brendywendyRoyalee Where's the option for 'having a balanced opinion and not having to have the blinkers on constantly'?
biggest LOL of the day from the most rabidly blinkered and unbalanced fellow i could possibly imagine
by brendywendy » 18 Jul 2011 14:33
by Hampshire Royal » 18 Jul 2011 15:31
by Terminal Boardom » 18 Jul 2011 15:38
by Ian Royal » 18 Jul 2011 16:29
RoyaleebrendywendyRoyalee Where's the option for 'having a balanced opinion and not having to have the blinkers on constantly'?
biggest LOL of the day from the most rabidly blinkered and unbalanced fellow i could possibly imagine
Your opinions are so lolzworthy I almost died of laughter at the irony overload. Every time you or Ian Roflyal disagree with me it validates my opinion.
by Hampshire Royal » 18 Jul 2011 16:36
by Murts-is-Lej » 18 Jul 2011 16:46
by Ian Royal » 18 Jul 2011 17:21
Terminal Boardom I fall into neither camp. My gripe has been the bollocks spewing forth from SJM about ambition and determination. Just look at the crap he came out with after the play off final defeat. If only he would STFU and concentrate on keeping the club on an even keel instead of falsely raising the expectation levels of supporters.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 259 guests