brendywendy dont have to assume anything tbf- thats exactly what he said in the interviews
He never said that he was forced to leave - he said he'd have liked to stay; that's a long way from being said he was forced to leave.
by Royalwaster » 19 Jul 2011 12:14
brendywendy dont have to assume anything tbf- thats exactly what he said in the interviews
by Royal Rother » 19 Jul 2011 12:56
by handbags_harris » 19 Jul 2011 13:42
Northern Git As I have said previously I would love to spend a few hours perusing the management accounts. And before anyone starts I am not suggesting in any way shape or form that there is anything underhanded, illegal, or otherwise dodgy about RFC's accounts, their accountants, or anybody involved in RFC limited, MM hotels limited or RFC PLC. Its simply an interest about how the day to day 'nuts and bolts' way the Madejski empire works
by brendywendy » 19 Jul 2011 15:07
Royalwasterbrendywendy dont have to assume anything tbf- thats exactly what he said in the interviews
He never said that he was forced to leave - he said he'd have liked to stay; that's a long way from being said he was forced to leave.
by brendywendy » 19 Jul 2011 15:09
handbags_harrisNorthern Git As I have said previously I would love to spend a few hours perusing the management accounts. And before anyone starts I am not suggesting in any way shape or form that there is anything underhanded, illegal, or otherwise dodgy about RFC's accounts, their accountants, or anybody involved in RFC limited, MM hotels limited or RFC PLC. Its simply an interest about how the day to day 'nuts and bolts' way the Madejski empire works
NG, there was an excellent article written for one of the last Whiff's from a bloke who had done just that. Well worth reading...
by RoyalBlue » 19 Jul 2011 17:26
CypryWimbBig Foot The club forced Gylfi to leave last summer, he wanted to stay
Sauce?
Me too - I keep hearing this, but I've never seen anything from Gylfi to that effect....
Forced is a strong word, I agree that it's possible that Gylfi said in conversation that he "didn't want to leave", but that's a World apart from being forced to go....
It's all about the context in which it's said - I didn't want to drive 3-4 hours and do a meeting at 4pm in Manchester last week, but for my career, it was the right thing to do, so I did it....
There's loads of things in life that we don't want to do, but we believe it's the right thing to do at the time - I strongly suspect that on occasions that Gylfi has said he didn't want to go, then that was the kind of context he was talking in....
by Northern Git » 19 Jul 2011 17:34
brendywendy do try and keep on subject.no need to mention my name in that post at all really.
Royal Rother Or mine. My senIsbiliteis have been upset.
by Royal Rother » 19 Jul 2011 17:44
RoyalBlue Can someone get hold of the interview he did with BBCRB quite some time after he left as that would lend some substance to this argument.
I'm pretty sure that in that interview he said that he didn't want to leave and wasn't looking for a move but that the club spoke to him and persuaded him that it was in the club's and his best interests to agree to the transfer. In other words, if he hadn't been spoken to along those lines, he wouldn't have left at that point in his career.
by Svlad Cjelli » 19 Jul 2011 18:00
Svlad Cjelli My recollection of the Siggy move - which came directly from people intimately involved in this transfer - was that the expectation everyone had was that he'd leave at the end of last season (i.e. 9 months later than he did). This was all tentatively mapped out and agreed as part of GS's career planning.
But Hoffenheim - who had been in regular contact about him checking on his progress for several years - made an offer which was considerably higher than anyone could expect - especially as it was cash up front. The club and GS then sat down and discussed this, and both parties decided it was in everyone's interests for the deal to be accepted. Once of the major factors for accepting this deal was that Hoffenheim had been such regular enquirers about GS, whereas there had been NO contact or interest whatsoever from any Premier League clubs. And the club certainly didn't "force him out" - they didn't tout him for sale, it was the culmination of Hoffenheim's long interest.
I'm not sure he was actually "persuaded" to leave as is being suggested, but under the circumstances it was no surprise he went to Hoffenheim, the only surprise was that they made their offer 9 months earlier than suggested an the size of the offer. At the time everyone agreed it was in everyone's best interests, including GS - which is a quite different what i being suggested.
by Ian Royal » 19 Jul 2011 18:08
by Northern Git » 19 Jul 2011 18:21
Royal Rother I assume he spilled his guts to Northern Git and in a black hole of depression said he was forced out of the club against his will...
by Ian Royal » 19 Jul 2011 19:11
by Northern Git » 19 Jul 2011 21:18
Ian Royal Who said he was keen to find a way to leave us?
He wasn't forced out, he didn't have to sign a contract with Hoffenheim.
by KC Royal » 19 Jul 2011 22:15
Ian Royal I still reckon there's a small chance Long'll stay. Call it an 8 in 10 chance of him being off.
Agree if he's going to go it has to be asap. Expect it to be about 12 August.
by RoyalBlue » 19 Jul 2011 22:48
Royal RotherRoyalBlue Can someone get hold of the interview he did with BBCRB quite some time after he left as that would lend some substance to this argument.
I'm pretty sure that in that interview he said that he didn't want to leave and wasn't looking for a move but that the club spoke to him and persuaded him that it was in the club's and his best interests to agree to the transfer. In other words, if he hadn't been spoken to along those lines, he wouldn't have left at that point in his career.
Helpful, honest and acting in everyone's best interests. Not forcing him out then, just ensuring he seized what was a brilliant opportunity for him, and, quite understandably, while his stock was so high, cashing in on a great talent to help fund the club for another year or 2.
I would say the sensitive and fair way it was handled was typical of the pastoral care RFC shows towards its young players.
by KC Royal » 19 Jul 2011 22:53
by Svlad Cjelli » 20 Jul 2011 08:34
by Hoop Blah » 20 Jul 2011 09:56
Svlad Cjelli I can see where people are going wrong, and that's taking as gospel truth the things that players or others in football say in interviews - or even are reported as having said.
by brendywendy » 20 Jul 2011 10:01
RoyalBlueRoyal RotherRoyalBlue Can someone get hold of the interview he did with BBCRB quite some time after he left as that would lend some substance to this argument.
I'm pretty sure that in that interview he said that he didn't want to leave and wasn't looking for a move but that the club spoke to him and persuaded him that it was in the club's and his best interests to agree to the transfer. In other words, if he hadn't been spoken to along those lines, he wouldn't have left at that point in his career.
Helpful, honest and acting in everyone's best interests. Not forcing him out then, just ensuring he seized what was a brilliant opportunity for him, and, quite understandably, while his stock was so high, cashing in on a great talent to help fund the club for another year or 2.
I would say the sensitive and fair way it was handled was typical of the pastoral care RFC shows towards its young players.
Next thing you'll be telling us Cameron and Clegg really have the best interests of impoverished students at heart!
Listen to Sig in the interview and then tell us that the club's prime motivation was his welfare and that he didn't feel he was edged towards the door when he would have preferred to stay. Also, I got the impression that McD who might have the player's best interests at heart wasn't the prime mover behind persuading Sig to move. Nor was his agent who presumably stood to gain financially from such a move.
by Harpers So Solid Crew » 20 Jul 2011 10:07
Users browsing this forum: El Diablo, Google [Bot], Greatwesternline, Sutekh and 306 guests