RTGs v STGs

Are you....

Poll ended at 15 Aug 2011 14:43
RTG?
87
76%
STG?
27
24%
 
Total votes: 114
User avatar
Svlad Cjelli
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 4605
Joined: 14 May 2008 09:25
Location: It's the Premier LEAGUE, you cretins. The Premiership hasn't existed for years.

Re: RTGs v STGs

by Svlad Cjelli » 28 Jul 2011 10:46

We live in an easy-access, blame, society.

People are used to being able to rant when things aren't going their way - in fact it's what the internet is best at. And on an anonymous message board you don't have to use facts p background knowledge to back up your opinions - as long as you say "FACT" at the end that's enough. And say something enough, no matter how far-fetched, and gullible people without
background knowledge will start to believe eit.

And, of course, everything is always someone's fault these days, and it's always so much easier to blame and criticise than to be positive and objective.

User avatar
floyd__streete
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 8326
Joined: 19 Jan 2005 18:03
Location: ARREST RAY ILSLEY.

Re: RTGs v STGs

by floyd__streete » 28 Jul 2011 13:41

Svlad Cjelli We live in an easy-access, blame, society.


And whose fault is that :twisted:

User avatar
Arch
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 4082
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 23:35
Location: USA! USA! USA!

Re: RTGs v STGs

by Arch » 28 Jul 2011 13:42

floyd__streete
Svlad Cjelli We live in an easy-access, blame, society.


And whose fault is that :twisted:

FACT

User avatar
Hoop Blah
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 13937
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:00
Location: I told you so.....

Re: RTGs v STGs

by Hoop Blah » 28 Jul 2011 13:59

Svlad Cjelli ...it's always so much easier to blame and criticise than to be positive and objective.


There is a lot of positivity on here that is just blind faith and optimism based on either naivity, blissful ignorance or just wishful thinking.

Although I'm all for being positive I think a touch of realism and a grip on reality gives a much more balanced view than just accepting everything as rosey without any inteligent and informed thought going into it (that comment's not pointed at you Dirk).

User avatar
brendywendy
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 12060
Joined: 04 Aug 2006 15:29
Location: coming straight outa crowthorne

Re: RTGs v STGs

by brendywendy » 28 Jul 2011 15:17

Hoop Blah
Svlad Cjelli ...it's always so much easier to blame and criticise than to be positive and objective.


There is a lot of positivity on here that is just blind faith and optimism based on either naivity, blissful ignorance or just wishful thinking.




thats a bit bit subjective tbf


User avatar
Hoop Blah
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 13937
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:00
Location: I told you so.....

Re: RTGs v STGs

by Hoop Blah » 28 Jul 2011 15:51

It is yes, but it's also often backed up by subsequent events.

It sometimes appears that some people think Reading are above criticism, infallible or somehow aren't subject to the same rules of the football jungle that every other club is.

User avatar
brendywendy
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 12060
Joined: 04 Aug 2006 15:29
Location: coming straight outa crowthorne

Re: RTGs v STGs

by brendywendy » 28 Jul 2011 16:44

i think you may be making the same mistake as i do when looking at a STG post there.
i dont think anyone on this board believes the club are above criticism, or that they deserve constant criticism.
thats just the way it looks sometimes when reading posts

andrew1957
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 4367
Joined: 29 Sep 2006 14:40
Location: Reading

Re: RTGs v STGs

by andrew1957 » 28 Jul 2011 17:30

Ironically I have been accused of being too RTG by many and too SGT by others - so I think I must be balanced.

In terms of the team and Brian McD I am definitely RTG. I fully expect Brian to work another miracle this season and surprise us again.

However, on the financial side of the club it still instinctively feels to me that things don't entirely stack up. I have also been disappointed at times that a tiny bit more ambition - such as investing in one or two more players in the second PL season and in selling Siggy a year too soon - have in turn cost us a relegation and a failed promotion attempt - so I guess in terms of the overall management of the club I have become STG.

User avatar
Svlad Cjelli
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 4605
Joined: 14 May 2008 09:25
Location: It's the Premier LEAGUE, you cretins. The Premiership hasn't existed for years.

Re: RTGs v STGs

by Svlad Cjelli » 28 Jul 2011 17:44

andrew1957 .....

However, on the financial side of the club it still instinctively feels to me that things don't entirely stack up. I have also been disappointed at times that a tiny bit more ambition - such as investing in one or two more players in the second PL season and in selling Siggy a year too soon - have in turn cost us a relegation and a failed promotion attempt - so I guess in terms of the overall management of the club I have become STG.


But you're missing the point that in the second PL season investment was availabel but the manager chose not to use it. So to blame that on the overall management of the club is unfair.


User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: RTGs v STGs

by Ian Royal » 30 Jul 2011 18:31

Svlad Cjelli
andrew1957 .....

However, on the financial side of the club it still instinctively feels to me that things don't entirely stack up. I have also been disappointed at times that a tiny bit more ambition - such as investing in one or two more players in the second PL season and in selling Siggy a year too soon - have in turn cost us a relegation and a failed promotion attempt - so I guess in terms of the overall management of the club I have become STG.


But you're missing the point that in the second PL season investment was availabel but the manager chose not to use it. So to blame that on the overall management of the club is unfair.


Also, assuming we did make that signing or two that Coppell backed out of at the last second, and instead stayed up, what happens the next season? We'd have narrowly avoided relegation, so be in need of some serious player influx to stay up again. Especially with so many of the buys (including longer term ones) we had made, not being good enough and our better players another year older.

We'd have either been relegated the next season, or we'd have had to spend more again. And again the season after. It's never about the difference you can make in one season, it's about the way you run the club long term and the expectation levels you set each season.

We've set out how we do things, people are ready for it even if they don't like it. If we up the ante one season, it'll be expected EVERY season.

AthleticoSpizz
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 24612
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 19:49
Location: A Hicks Hoof from Coley Park

Re: RTGs v STGs

by AthleticoSpizz » 30 Jul 2011 20:40

or we could've quite simply done a Wigan for the past half dozen or so years

User avatar
leon
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 30953
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:18
Location: Hips, Lips, Tits, Power

Re: RTGs v STGs

by leon » 31 Jul 2011 01:03

AthleticoSpizz or we could've quite simply done a Wigan for the past half dozen or so years


exactly..they're still hanging in

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: RTGs v STGs

by Ian Royal » 31 Jul 2011 11:52

leon
AthleticoSpizz or we could've quite simply done a Wigan for the past half dozen or so years


exactly..they're still hanging in


But they have been spending well beyond their means and are likely to be in major trouble when the inevitable happens. All it takes is one bad season and that extra spending each season, which accumulates big debt over 3, 4 or 5 years, suddenly comes back to haunt you.

Clearly we made a big mistake second season. I think few people dispute that, and it's fairly well documented that the money was there but Coppell bottled spending it. That was a major mistake. But it was pretty much a one off. Yet the STGs take it as proof positive that Madejski is running the club badly, when in fact he's getting the balance pretty much spot on every season.


User avatar
SouthDownsRoyal
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 11243
Joined: 08 Dec 2005 12:48

Re: RTGs v STGs

by SouthDownsRoyal » 31 Jul 2011 18:04

LOL @ glasses 'tinted' with shit

User avatar
SpaceCruiser
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 5590
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 14:17
Location: Desperately seeking to return home

Re: RTGs v STGs

by SpaceCruiser » 31 Jul 2011 18:35

SouthDownsRoyal LOL @ glasses 'tinted' with shit


Indeed, and it probably would smell quite a bit.

User avatar
SouthDownsRoyal
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 11243
Joined: 08 Dec 2005 12:48

Re: RTGs v STGs

by SouthDownsRoyal » 31 Jul 2011 19:23

SpaceCruiser
SouthDownsRoyal LOL @ glasses 'tinted' with shit


Indeed, and it probably would smell quite a bit.


seeing could be a problem

IMHO

User avatar
brendywendy
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 12060
Joined: 04 Aug 2006 15:29
Location: coming straight outa crowthorne

Re: RTGs v STGs

by brendywendy » 31 Jul 2011 23:28

egzackerly grasshopper

User avatar
Arch
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 4082
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 23:35
Location: USA! USA! USA!

Re: RTGs v STGs

by Arch » 01 Aug 2011 01:08

\o/

brendy > manset

User avatar
SouthDownsRoyal
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 11243
Joined: 08 Dec 2005 12:48

Re: RTGs v STGs

by SouthDownsRoyal » 01 Aug 2011 10:08

anything / anyone >>> manset

User avatar
brendywendy
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 12060
Joined: 04 Aug 2006 15:29
Location: coming straight outa crowthorne

Re: RTGs v STGs

by brendywendy » 01 Aug 2011 10:41

the beast will make you all eat your words fools

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 267 guests

It is currently 26 Nov 2024 02:24