FiNeRaIn You can be a pedant all you want, I'm perfectly capable of structuring my grammar I just simply can't be bothered to take care during these silly debates anymore.
As for " using a brain" and " adding up", you always use these petty insults but very rarely do you counter anything with actual facts or figures. You're a pretty tiresome character on these threads and I knew as soon as I quoted your name you'd pop out of your shell with the same old tripe. In that respect its my own fault.
The facts are we raked in a lot of money during the prem campaign and 40million-ish since in player sales. All this into account we've spent close to sweet FA on the team. That cannot be argued and it doesn't need a mathematician to do so.
Moving on.
It has been explained to you, reasonably politely in the main, by about a dozen different posters, on probably 40 or 50 occasions now (we've all had several goes at it) where the money has gone and not once have you accepted any of the FACTS given.
It is only a matter of basic addition and subtraction yet you are quite obviously incapable of taking in even the most basic of sums - which is cool, I'm sure your intelligence lies in some other less academic area (can addition and subtraction be called academic?). But it really is frustrating when you pop up on every one of these threads asking the exact same question every bloody time.
You quote a small part of the story which is how much we've sold players for, and no-one really argues with you on that score but it's just one part of the story. You quote Sky money at £90m today which I think was shown to be £30m over the top, but I'm not going to make a big deal of that (simple mistake eh, £30,000,000?) because the main issue to me is that you will not accept that the numbers we quote for you, numbers that are taken straight from the accounts filed at Companies House, are correct.
We know what we are talking about. If
you understood double entry accounting then you would know it is just not possible to hide the vast sums of money anywhere in those accounts; but you don't so you won't. Which, although I'm a patient man and have trained many people in the noble art of bookkeeping and accounting, can actually get quite irritating after a while.
If it is ever proved that SJM and Myers Clarke (the auditors) are in cahoots in some massive and complex money-laundering operation I will apologise to you most profusely and send you a bottle of the finest malt whiskey, but seriously, in the meantime, on this subject, could you just shut the fcuk up?