by WoodleyRoyal » 17 Aug 2011 16:31
by Arch » 17 Aug 2011 16:43
Rob-RoyalbrendywendyRob-Royal Friday, good post - you could also add that just because you can doesn't mean you 'have' to respond to every single thread a hundred times!!
They all know who they are! And worse, because of that they seem to think this makes them more qualified!
I wonder how many of us go back to 94 when this all started and now can't be bothered anymore...maybe we should do a poll?!
LOL
isnt this post, and indeed the whole thread just a thinly veiled "stop disagreeing with me"
Yeah it's all about you - 37,000 posts and counting, all of them meaningful contributions - congratulations!
I thought about you the other day when walking down the bread isle in tesco's until I looked again and it said Thick Cut.......
by Man Friday » 17 Aug 2011 16:48
by brendywendy » 17 Aug 2011 16:50
WoodleyRoyal the problem is though, if Madejski wants the buyer to run the club like a business as well, there wont be any changes. To take the playing squad and stadium to the next level will cost millions, and that would be classed as reckless not tight ship like he wants
by brendywendy » 17 Aug 2011 16:51
Rob-Royalbrendywendy i gave you my sensible, restrained and considered opinion on the OP thanks.
and i have no idea what my post count, or the inherrant meaningfulness of any post on an internet forum has to do with owt.
but top, top, comedy stylings anyway.
Comedy Stylings???? There goes another rib!
by Arch » 17 Aug 2011 16:51
Man Friday roadrunner has said all I'd want to say on this thread. (Apart from I'm always suspicious when threads start off with something along the lines of 'why can't we disagree without getting nasty?' As BW says, it's often a thinly-veiled plea for 'agree with me'. ...
by WoodleyRoyal » 17 Aug 2011 16:52
brendywendyWoodleyRoyal the problem is though, if Madejski wants the buyer to run the club like a business as well, there wont be any changes. To take the playing squad and stadium to the next level will cost millions, and that would be classed as reckless not tight ship like he wants
dont think hed care- if his price is matched, and he believes the man to be honourable, and a good business man, hel'll sell, and itll be down to the new man to set the plans and budgets he sees fit
by brendywendy » 17 Aug 2011 16:56
WoodleyRoyalbrendywendyWoodleyRoyal the problem is though, if Madejski wants the buyer to run the club like a business as well, there wont be any changes. To take the playing squad and stadium to the next level will cost millions, and that would be classed as reckless not tight ship like he wants
dont think hed care- if his price is matched, and he believes the man to be honourable, and a good business man, hel'll sell, and itll be down to the new man to set the plans and budgets he sees fit
there in lies the problem though there are no honourable people who want to invest in football
by manny96 » 17 Aug 2011 17:05
Z175 My dream is not that he will sell to a billionnaire, my dream is that he will donate the club to STAR.
by brendywendy » 17 Aug 2011 17:10
Z175 My dream is not that he will sell to a billionnaire, my dream is that he will donate the club to STAR.
by Arch » 17 Aug 2011 17:11
manny96Z175 My dream is not that he will sell to a billionnaire, my dream is that he will donate the club to STAR.
Fair. I'd be concerned they'd be more vulnerable to the short-termism of many fans. Even an established model of fan ownership like Barcelona has left them in stonking amounts of debt and doing idiotic deals like for Fabregas, to satiate the fans who elected Rossell on the populist promise that he'd get his man. I'm sure there are good, fair and sustainable ways for a club to be run by fans, like the German model of at least 50% fan control. But I just sometimes think we're too dumb...
by manny96 » 17 Aug 2011 17:14
Archmanny96Z175 My dream is not that he will sell to a billionnaire, my dream is that he will donate the club to STAR.
Fair. I'd be concerned they'd be more vulnerable to the short-termism of many fans. Even an established model of fan ownership like Barcelona has left them in stonking amounts of debt and doing idiotic deals like for Fabregas, to satiate the fans who elected Rossell on the populist promise that he'd get his man. I'm sure there are good, fair and sustainable ways for a club to be run by fans, like the German model of at least 50% fan control. But I just sometimes think we're too dumb...
Good point, Plato.
by mr_number » 17 Aug 2011 17:15
WoodleyRoyalbrendywendyWoodleyRoyal the problem is though, if Madejski wants the buyer to run the club like a business as well, there wont be any changes. To take the playing squad and stadium to the next level will cost millions, and that would be classed as reckless not tight ship like he wants
dont think hed care- if his price is matched, and he believes the man to be honourable, and a good business man, hel'll sell, and itll be down to the new man to set the plans and budgets he sees fit
there in lies the problem though there are no honourable people who want to invest in football
by brendywendy » 17 Aug 2011 17:16
by Rob-Royal » 17 Aug 2011 17:21
by Harpers So Solid Crew » 17 Aug 2011 17:22
roadrunner
Do I want Madejski out? No I don't. But I do want to see someone fresh to come in who has dreams and ambition to make this a big club, who will spend more adventuriously but also within reason, and who will have the clubs best interests at heart and not their own. Sadly, there isn't many out there like that.
by brendywendy » 17 Aug 2011 17:24
Rob-Royal I thought about you the other day when walking down the bread isle in tesco's until I looked again and it said Thick Cut.......
by WoodleyRoyal » 17 Aug 2011 17:25
by urz13 » 17 Aug 2011 17:38
by mr_number » 17 Aug 2011 17:41
brendywendy quinn every time
flat cap or not!
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 177 guests