by Z175 »
18 Aug 2011 12:02
I agree with the above points that pre-AFC Wimbledon setting up a new club was less realisable.
Until that point fans were largely disenfranchised and taken for granted. Since the 90s football has become an expensive consumer product, but 1983 was a time when fans interests, and indeed safetly, were not a priority,
Look at Brighton's demolition of the Goldstone, even in 1997 their Chairman Bill Archer made a packet and they were homeless until last week! In fact Archer's business techniques were similar to Maxwell. He bought companies cheaply, ran them like a dictator, piled them with debt and sold them for a lot. All his ventures virtually went bankrupt with investors losing fortunes while he made 100s of millions.
So it really could have happened to us.
Yet I don't think the ground sale was Maxwell's only motive. Selling Elm Park made this a risk free deal, but I think he genuinely belived Thames Valley Royals could have become a top flight franchise, like how in rugby London Irish have become so at a purpose built out of town stadium representing the Thames Valley region.
But what wasn't apparent in the 1980s was the growth of the M4 corridor into Britains's silicon valley. Reading is now a rich place in a highly populated area. Premiership football brings 25k sell out crowds to Reading alone. Back in 1983 with Reading's paltry crowds, this would have seemed impossible without some forward thinking. So it was the country that sold out, not the club. The replacement of the breweries and biscuit factories with subsidiaries doing the bidding of Microsoft, HP and Oracle changed the face of the area and have allowed us to keep to the traditions of the independent Reading Football Club of 1871.