by Sarah Star » 10 Sep 2011 19:01
by tomrfcurz » 10 Sep 2011 19:06
by sandman » 10 Sep 2011 19:14
by andrew1957 » 10 Sep 2011 19:33
by FiNeRaIn » 10 Sep 2011 19:35
tomrfcurz Was definitely Faurlin by the way, right next to the bloke - spent the whole game on his phone!
by Hoop Blah » 10 Sep 2011 19:38
sandman Feds - Could have been five if it wasn't for him although as his name isn't McCarthy he won't get credit. Those blaming him for the first are on a different planet. 6
by loyalroyal4life » 10 Sep 2011 19:44
by Tilehurst End » 10 Sep 2011 19:47
by sandman » 10 Sep 2011 19:49
Hoop Blahsandman Feds - Could have been five if it wasn't for him although as his name isn't McCarthy he won't get credit. Those blaming him for the first are on a different planet. 6
Irrespective of the first goal, what other saves of any note did he make? Finerain mentioned the potential 1 on 1 he came out to close down (nothing I wouldn't expect a competent keeper to do) and then there was the elaborate camera save to his left late in the first half. Apart from that all I can remember him doing was spralling a few times as cross-come-shots sneeked wide of his posts.
Happy to be proved wrong but I don't see where else he kept the score down. We were awful but Watford didn't create many scoring chances.
by Schards#2 » 10 Sep 2011 19:50
by grey_squirrel » 10 Sep 2011 19:50
Hoop Blahsandman Feds - Could have been five if it wasn't for him although as his name isn't McCarthy he won't get credit. Those blaming him for the first are on a different planet. 6
Irrespective of the first goal, what other saves of any note did he make? Finerain mentioned the potential 1 on 1 he came out to close down (nothing I wouldn't expect a competent keeper to do) and then there was the elaborate camera save to his left late in the first half. Apart from that all I can remember him doing was spralling a few times as cross-come-shots sneeked wide of his posts.
Happy to be proved wrong but I don't see where else he kept the score down. We were awful but Watford didn't create many scoring chances.
by Wycombe Royal » 10 Sep 2011 19:56
by The Real Sandhurst Royal » 10 Sep 2011 20:03
by FiNeRaIn » 10 Sep 2011 20:07
Wycombe Royal Our players don't move into space when they don't have the ball.
by georgerob » 10 Sep 2011 20:12
by chilipepper91 » 10 Sep 2011 20:30
georgerob I feel that Howard should be introduced into the starting line up for the Doncaster Rovers game as we have struggled to create chances in the last couple of games and Howard is more likely to create something.
by Man Friday » 10 Sep 2011 20:32
Tilehurst End Kebe doesn't want to be here anymore, totally disinterested and is not going to risk injury before January.
by Wycombe Royal » 10 Sep 2011 20:53
FiNeRaInWycombe Royal Our players don't move into space when they don't have the ball.
You won't find much of that at this level to be honest, I hardly ever see other teams making barcelona type space finding when they come here. But if we do all the other aspects consistently we'll be a force, sadly we won't because we are crap.
by Simon's Church » 10 Sep 2011 20:56
by The Real Sandhurst Royal » 10 Sep 2011 21:01
Simon Church wrote: TBH though, we made it to the play-off final just by basically lumping it forward and percentage balls down the line.
Users browsing this forum: Horsham Royal, Mid Sussex Royal, Royal Ginger and 222 guests