Ferris Are you gonna try and get some compensation?
I don't know yet, it's hard to know what really goes on when il have a blinkered view, that's why i'm asking for people to get in touch with any infomation they have on it.
by LWJ » 28 Sep 2011 15:22
Ferris Are you gonna try and get some compensation?
by pace=forster » 28 Sep 2011 15:27
by who are ya? » 28 Sep 2011 15:29
by LWJ » 28 Sep 2011 15:31
pace=forster I wasn't actually there being a mega plastic, but im really glad to have turned what was looking like a non mover into a 2 page thread.
And you've done a fine job making yourself look like a mug all on your own: http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/801/006hhy.jpg/
by RoyalBlue » 28 Sep 2011 15:54
Svlad CjelliRoyalBlue Objection M'Lord. At no point has the accused admitted to swearing at a steward. In fact his statement appears to be a denial of that accusation. Secondly the use of the word 'bullshit' can hardly be regarded as swearing, particularly when far worse can be heard every day on the tv channels pre-watershed.
Be that as it may, I'm afraid the odds are stacked against your client, since the courts tend to take into account more what the Police say football supporters at matches said/did than what may have happened in reality.
So the CPS will be following their standard procedure of pressing for a 3-year Football Banning Order for all "football-related offences".
by Royal Lady » 29 Sep 2011 12:36
by Red » 29 Sep 2011 12:51
by postwhisperer » 29 Sep 2011 14:27
by Svlad Cjelli » 29 Sep 2011 14:31
RoyalBlue Hence the need for my client to get some eye witnesses who are prepared to verify his version of events and make it far more difficult for the courts to believe the word of the good old boys in blue. Fortunately the proliferation of mobile devices with videos and cameras also offer some hope to the underclass that all football supporters have been categorised into.
by Duraroyal » 29 Sep 2011 14:40
by Red » 29 Sep 2011 14:57
Svlad CjelliRoyalBlue Hence the need for my client to get some eye witnesses who are prepared to verify his version of events and make it far more difficult for the courts to believe the word of the good old boys in blue. Fortunately the proliferation of mobile devices with videos and cameras also offer some hope to the underclass that all football supporters have been categorised into.
Quite, but sadly the prevailing view amongst the majority of football supporters is that whenever a fellow supporter is arrested, or suffers injury whilst being arrested, is "well, he must have deserved it".
by Man Friday » 29 Sep 2011 16:17
by leicsRoyal » 29 Sep 2011 22:06
by Ian Royal » 29 Sep 2011 23:16
leicsRoyal Unfortunately if as you say 'after a few minutes of struggling they pushed me to the floor' this is about as good as it gets for resisting arrest.
In light of the above, I would imagine that any film that has been taken is not particularly going to be in your favour.
by Royal Lady » 30 Sep 2011 08:37
by rfcjoe » 30 Sep 2011 08:37
by leicsRoyal » 30 Sep 2011 09:06
Royal Lady Yes. Because it takes 9 policemen to subdue an 18 year old into arrest. Way too heavy handed from what I have been told.
by URZZZZZZZZ » 30 Sep 2011 09:52
by M-U-R-T-Y » 30 Sep 2011 11:31
URZZZZZZZZ breach of the peace
by Cobi » 30 Sep 2011 11:38
URZZZZZZZZ I saw him getting carted out the toilets by 8 policeman, I thought it had been a breach of the peace George Michael style
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 87 guests