What the papers say: Burnley (Talking Tactics)

Sarah Star
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3186
Joined: 18 Feb 2008 12:29

What the papers say: Burnley (Talking Tactics)

by Sarah Star » 08 Oct 2011 09:26

The Clitheroe Advertiser TALKING TACTICS: Royals can be isolated by pace
By Phil Smith
Published on Saturday 8 October 2011 09:00

SCOUT Phil Smith takes a three-part look at Burnley’s next opponents Reading, who travel to Turf Moor a week tomorrow.

Part One: TO quote Stan Ternent, “A blind man on a galloping horse” can ascertain that Reading’s offensive prowess has diminished following the departure of Shane Long to West Bromwich Albion.

Last season’s play-off finalists managed to warm the gloves of Carl Ikeme just once in their previous fixture against Middlesbrough.

At the other end, Adam Federici kept a clean sheet last weekend, his third of the season.

In his 10 outings prior to the Middlesbrough game, he conceded two or more goals on five occasions.

The Australian international does not command his area.

Poor positioning has led to him conceding at his near post on numerous occasions.

As I mentioned when discussing Lee Camp, this is a criminal error for any goalkeeper.

The back four of Joseph Mills, Alex Pearce, Kaspars Gorkss and Shaun Cummings can be isolated by pace.

This was evident in their fixture against Bristol City.

Reading returned home from Ashton Gate with the points courtesy of three goals in the final 18 minutes.

All who observed the fixture will testify, however, that the Robins could, and should, have had the game sewn up long before Jobi McAnuff began the fightback.

Jamal Cambell-Ryce and Albert Adomah dominated proceedings.

Slow reaction speed is evident from both full backs.

Pace and a quick change of direction should unlock the door for Burnley next weekend.

Both are qualities which Ross Wallace and Junior Stanislas bring to the table.

Their defence is narrow and it will be evident that both full backs are sucked in centrally.

Would I suggest a policy of width? Not exclusively!

Expect them to sit deep and allow Burnley time on the ball.

Pressure will not be exerted.

They will back off and invite the opposition to take a chance from distance - a tactic designed to nullify the threat of pace.

It may well be successful.

However, Burnley are not a one trick pony.

Wallace, Charlie Austin and Jay Rodriguez have all netted from distance this campaign.

Brian Easton and Kieran Trippier will be afforded great freedom.

They must come from behind, provide width and deliver the ball into the danger zone (see Diagram).

Reading will adopt a conservative approach at Turf Moor.

The deep defensive line evidence of this assumption.

Some may suggest this indicates their willingness to settle for a point.

I would not disagree.

As with any strategy, however, it is not without an element of risk.

Their midfield will be afforded a greater workload, and thus risk surrendering territory in the middle of the park.

Part two on Tuesday will explore the Royals offensive organisation and transition.

http://www.clitheroeadvertiser.co.uk/sp ... _1_3849068

I think they've been reading HNA?

User avatar
Row Z Royal
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 10365
Joined: 07 Jan 2006 20:01
Location: LOLandmarks come and go. There'll only ever be one "Clickety Clique"

Re: What the papers say: Burnley (Talking Tactics)

by Row Z Royal » 08 Oct 2011 10:07

Snappy writing.

Mr Angry
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5962
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 16:05
Location: South Oxfordshire

Re: What the papers say: Burnley (Talking Tactics)

by Mr Angry » 08 Oct 2011 10:12

Wow, reading that, there is no need for us to turn up, is there? Burnley have already won the 3 points.

:roll:

pea
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2261
Joined: 07 Mar 2009 16:16
Location: brighton

Re: What the papers say: Burnley (Talking Tactics)

by pea » 08 Oct 2011 10:20

That was the most painful read ever.

Stanislas and Wallace hardly have me quaking in my boots...

User avatar
Simon's Church
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3888
Joined: 16 Jul 2011 19:11

Re: What the papers say: Burnley (Talking Tactics)

by Simon's Church » 08 Oct 2011 10:23

Stanislas is quality.

I do like how it's written in nice short bullet points so that us mongs can follow it though.


pea
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2261
Joined: 07 Mar 2009 16:16
Location: brighton

Re: What the papers say: Burnley (Talking Tactics)

by pea » 08 Oct 2011 10:26

Simon's Church Stanislas is quality.

I do like how it's written in nice short bullet points so that us mongs can follow it though.


They're not bad players but the suggestion that Burnley will beat us because Wallace will beat Cummings for pace and agility is quite funny.

User avatar
Avon Royal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 4652
Joined: 28 Jan 2006 10:54
Location: Diggs. Sideline. Touchdown. Unbelievable.

Re: What the papers say: Burnley (Talking Tactics)

by Avon Royal » 08 Oct 2011 10:59

Other team in realising we are shit shocker.

leww_rfc
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 4454
Joined: 27 Apr 2009 19:29

Re: What the papers say: Burnley (Talking Tactics)

by leww_rfc » 08 Oct 2011 11:04

Burnley fan in overrating his club shocker

howser
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1651
Joined: 29 Sep 2004 20:27
Location: moray scotland

Re: What the papers say: Burnley (Talking Tactics)

by howser » 08 Oct 2011 12:01

Think we all knew most of that anyway, just shows what a strong squad McD has beem allowed to gather together !!


RoyalJames101
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1053
Joined: 24 Sep 2010 20:55

Re: What the papers say: Burnley (Talking Tactics)

by RoyalJames101 » 08 Oct 2011 13:06

The Clitheroe Advertiser
Expect them to sit deep and allow Burnley time on the ball.


I thought we were the opposite of this? But i'll take his word for it. :roll:

User avatar
Irvinchangeyaname
Member
Posts: 673
Joined: 01 Jan 2005 09:28
Location: Hove

Re: What the papers say: Burnley (Talking Tactics)

by Irvinchangeyaname » 08 Oct 2011 13:19

leww_rfc Burnley fan in overrating his club shocker

Which parts are you referring to?

Winnershroyal
Member
Posts: 385
Joined: 25 Sep 2010 20:15

Re: What the papers say: Burnley (Talking Tactics)

by Winnershroyal » 08 Oct 2011 13:38

Row Z Royal Snappy writing.


Must read Lee Child..daddy-o..the cold six thousand.

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: What the papers say: Burnley (Talking Tactics)

by Ian Royal » 08 Oct 2011 14:04

They might be in for a shock if they expect us to be there looking for a point only. Quite happy for them to underestimate our attack based on the M'boro game too.


User avatar
Royal Prince
Member
Posts: 338
Joined: 07 May 2011 21:30

Re: What the papers say: Burnley (Talking Tactics)

by Royal Prince » 08 Oct 2011 20:06

Strange how he doesn't mention any of our strengths. If I was a manager I'd like to know not only where the opponent was weak, but also where they pose the greatest threat. Hopefully it's all to come in part two, otherwise the lad is just a demented Burnley fan who's overstating our obvious floors.

P.s. for what's it's worth, and I should wait for the prediction thread, but I can see us sneaking a win up there while the pressure is off.

User avatar
Mike Hunt
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2812
Joined: 01 Jul 2008 08:24
Location: Blue and White

Re: What the papers say: Burnley (Talking Tactics)

by Mike Hunt » 09 Oct 2011 07:30

Royal Prince Strange how he doesn't mention any of our strengths. If I was a manager I'd like to know not only where the opponent was weak, but also where they pose the greatest threat. Hopefully it's all to come in part two, otherwise the lad is just a demented Burnley fan who's overstating our obvious floors.

P.s. for what's it's worth, and I should wait for the prediction thread, but I can see us sneaking a win up there while the pressure is off.



Part two on Tuesday will explore the Royals offensive organisation and transition.

I also cast my eye over the new Ole Gunnar Solskjaer.

User avatar
floyd__streete
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 8326
Joined: 19 Jan 2005 18:03
Location: ARREST RAY ILSLEY.

Re: What the papers say: Burnley (Talking Tactics)

by floyd__streete » 09 Oct 2011 13:09

Pretty spot on summary tbh. Perhaps we should e-mail it to McDermott.

claretfan
New Member
Posts: 2
Joined: 12 Jan 2005 11:42

Re: What the papers say: Burnley (Talking Tactics)

by claretfan » 09 Oct 2011 13:12

Just to point out that Phil Smith is not a Burnley fan. He is a professional scout hired by several local newspapers to give his opinion on Burnley's next opponents. If you read any of our forums you will find that Burnley fans don't think too highly of his opinion.

biscuitman
Member
Posts: 968
Joined: 16 Aug 2005 23:27

Re: What the papers say: Burnley (Talking Tactics)

by biscuitman » 09 Oct 2011 13:31

Just to point out that Phil Smith is not a Burnley fan. He is a professional scout hired by several local newspapers to give his opinion on Burnley's next opponents. If you read any of our forums you will find that Burnley fans don't think too highly of his opinion.


Why don't you get a Burnley fan to do it? What idiots are paying for his service when money is so tight in this day and age.

claretfan
New Member
Posts: 2
Joined: 12 Jan 2005 11:42

Re: What the papers say: Burnley (Talking Tactics)

by claretfan » 09 Oct 2011 13:46

biscuitman
Just to point out that Phil Smith is not a Burnley fan. He is a professional scout hired by several local newspapers to give his opinion on Burnley's next opponents. If you read any of our forums you will find that Burnley fans don't think too highly of his opinion.


Why don't you get a Burnley fan to do it? What idiots are paying for his service when money is so tight in this day and age.


Most Burnley fans would agree with you but the newspaper's argument is that it's supposed to be a neutral opinion, although you have to wonder, if he's so good, why isn't he working full time for a professional club.

User avatar
brendywendy
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 12060
Joined: 04 Aug 2006 15:29
Location: coming straight outa crowthorne

Re: What the papers say: Burnley (Talking Tactics)

by brendywendy » 09 Oct 2011 16:05

pretty fair assessment of our weaknesses id say.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 143 guests

It is currently 16 Nov 2024 02:04