by Rex » 16 Dec 2011 07:05
by melonhead » 16 Dec 2011 10:13
Hoop Blahmelonhead kebe clearly asked not to be given the ball a second earlier so i have no problem accepting thats what happened if thats what they say
Sorry to go back to this again but.....
I've just watched the TV coverage for the first time and there's no way that Kebe was asking not to receive the ball, it's much more like he's telling Cummings that he's got time and to be calm as the ball comes out to him. Furthermore, just a few seconds before this so called 'don't give me the ball' gesture he was calling for the ball with both arms out as McAnuff moved into the box.
by Extended-Phenotype » 16 Dec 2011 10:32
by Hoop Blah » 16 Dec 2011 17:07
melonheadHoop Blahmelonhead kebe clearly asked not to be given the ball a second earlier so i have no problem accepting thats what happened if thats what they say
Sorry to go back to this again but.....
I've just watched the TV coverage for the first time and there's no way that Kebe was asking not to receive the ball, it's much more like he's telling Cummings that he's got time and to be calm as the ball comes out to him. Furthermore, just a few seconds before this so called 'don't give me the ball' gesture he was calling for the ball with both arms out as McAnuff moved into the box.
disagree
by ZacNaloen » 16 Dec 2011 17:10
by peterroyal76 » 16 Dec 2011 19:13
by Franchise FC » 16 Dec 2011 19:46
peterroyal76 In tonights evening standard Sam Alladyce said that Jimmy did nothing wrong and didn't provoke anybody,he also said that being elbowed in the face is provocation.
It would be interesting to see what Jason Roberts say's about the challenge now that he's had a chance to see it.
by toppy » 16 Dec 2011 20:21
Franchise FCpeterroyal76 In tonights evening standard Sam Alladyce said that Jimmy did nothing wrong and didn't provoke anybody,he also said that being elbowed in the face is provocation.
It would be interesting to see what Jason Roberts say's about the challenge now that he's had a chance to see it.
Roberts won't be saying anything - it would mean him admitting he was wrong
by Yahoops » 17 Dec 2011 10:36
by toppy » 17 Dec 2011 10:47
Yahoops Dear Mr Yahoops
Reference CAS-1189179-MX3T5Z
Thank you for contacting us about 'The Football League Show' broadcast on BBC One on 10 December.
We’re sorry for any offence caused during the unscripted item on the programme. We can assure you that there was no approval of violence intended by Steve Claridge, nor were the comments intended as racist by him
Steve Claridge made it clear verbally that he couldn’t condone Jack Collison’s actions. In many ways, Steve’s comments mirrored those of the West Ham manager Sam Allardyce, that what Collison did was wrong, however there was a feeling that Kebe’s baiting of the opposition was highly inappropriate, unsportsmanlike and would do nothing but add an extra element of frustration to the bad day that West Ham were already having. As a former professional footballer, Steve has seen this happen before with similar results and while not condoning Collison’s kick in any way, the action itself did not surprise him.
In addition, Steve is quite clear that Kebe’s actions are contrary to what is acceptable in the football league. Kebe’s actions may be more acceptable elsewhere in the world; certainly baiting an opposition player/team is viewed differently from country to country. Culturally there are differences in what is considered more or less acceptable in terms of on-field behaviour. It’s very much part of the variety and joy of world football and Steve found that Jimmy Kebe might have been unaware exactly how such baiting is viewed here as a non-English player. The amount of subsequent air-time devoted to the incident indicates just how fervently the public feels about Kebe’s actions.
Nevertheless, we’re guided by the feedback we receive and I can assure you I've registered your complaint on our audience log. This is a daily report of audience feedback that's made available to all BBC staff, including members of the BBC Executive Board, channel controllers and other senior managers.
The audience logs are seen as important documents that can help shape decisions about future programming and content.
Thanks for taking the time to contact us.
Kind Regards
Mark Roberts
BBC Complaints
http://www.bbc.co.uk/complaints
NB This is sent from an outgoing account only which is not monitored. You cannot reply to this email address but if necessary please contact us via our webform quoting any case number we provided.
by Yellowcoat » 17 Dec 2011 10:51
by rhroyal » 17 Dec 2011 11:08
Yellowcoat Not much though. Seems like the usual arrogant BBC - we are right/you are wrong - to me.
by Royal Rother » 17 Dec 2011 11:10
by Yahoops » 17 Dec 2011 11:35
by The Cube » 17 Dec 2011 11:36
BBC apologists ...would do nothing but add an extra element of frustration to the bad day that West Ham were already having.
by Ian Royal » 17 Dec 2011 12:24
IdealrhroyalYellowcoat Not much though. Seems like the usual arrogant BBC - we are right/you are wrong - to me.
Decent to dignify it with a thought out, individual response if you ask me.
Except I received the exact same response word for word, to an entirely individual complaint, which surely differs from the one sent by the other guy.
So no, they did not send a thought out, individual response - they sent the same one to everyone, containing the same bullshit.
by Hoop Blah » 17 Dec 2011 13:37
Yellowcoat Not much though. Seems like the usual arrogant BBC - we are right/you are wrong - to me.
by SpaceCruiser » 18 Dec 2011 13:36
by Rex » 18 Dec 2011 13:46
by Royal Rother » 18 Dec 2011 14:24
SpaceCruiser It really is laughable calling pulling up socks as unsporting. It's only pulling up socks, ffs! Get over it, people.
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], Plymouth exile, Royals and Racers, South Coast Royal, st george, URZZZZZZZZ and 222 guests