NO LONGER A RUMOUR - Karl Sheppard

441 posts
User avatar
Svlad Cjelli
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 4605
Joined: 14 May 2008 09:25
Location: It's the Premier LEAGUE, you cretins. The Premiership hasn't existed for years.

Re: The Lord is Our Sheppard

by Svlad Cjelli » 12 Jan 2012 20:04

FiNeRaIn You are surprisingly mute on the earlier debate. I also forgot to add fae, henry and cox transfer deals in there. I'll accept your revoking of the made up 25 million you posted and accept the apology of accusing me of doing just that.


Your completely imaging any apology - because you aint getting one from me. I still disute your figures.

User avatar
FiNeRaIn
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 6231
Joined: 22 Jul 2004 17:44
Location: Los Angeles

Re: The Lord is Our Sheppard

by FiNeRaIn » 12 Jan 2012 20:10

Svlad Cjelli
FiNeRaIn You are surprisingly mute on the earlier debate. I also forgot to add fae, henry and cox transfer deals in there. I'll accept your revoking of the made up 25 million you posted and accept the apology of accusing me of doing just that.


Your completely imaging any apology - because you aint getting one from me. I still disute your figures.


Dispute all you want, you're been proven wrong.

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: NO LONGER A RUMOUR - Karl Sheppard

by Ian Royal » 12 Jan 2012 20:15

Jesus Christ. Why is it so fricking hard for some of you to see the difference between an idiot who wants us to spend the earth all the time, or dismisses anyone who doesn't come from a big club or for a big fee as shit and people who are a bit concerned that we are overly reliant on trying for cheap-gambles to come good.

We have an overabundence of strikers who aren't really making a proper impact or are ones for a year or two down the line. It's brilliant when it pays off, and yes, sometimes, like Doyle they make an instant impact. But the vast majority who succeed take time and the majority (of cheap gambles) fail.

I'm well aware every signing is a gamble. When I use that phrase its specifically for those players who are almost totally unknown quantities.

Sheppard may be an excellent signing, straight away, or in a year or so. I hope he is. I'd be delighted. But that doesn't change the fact that for success this season, we're currently banking on a striker showing significantly better form over the rest of the season than they've shown for us, or at this level before.

Sheppard would be a good signing, just like Doyle was, if we had a Kitson and a Lita already. But we don't. At best we've got a Lita in Hunt.

He has a lot going for him, goalscoring record, age, European experience.... but anyone who thinks the chances of him having much impact this season are anything other than slim is deluding themselves. Especially given his fitness.

That's why there's a fair few questioning this. It's not a case of saying don't look for the buried gems. Or we shouldn't have signed him. It's more that we've signed several we shouldn't have bothered with already and we need to lose some of the obssession we're developing with hunting out these gems.

If we hadn't wasted time and money on the likes of Baseya and Brett Williams, players who were never going to make it here, and who I believe are either older, or have far worse scoring records... or both, there would be a lot less concern.

1871royals
Member
Posts: 278
Joined: 11 Jun 2004 08:57

Re: NO LONGER A RUMOUR - Karl Sheppard

by 1871royals » 12 Jan 2012 20:30

I hope Sheppard could be a good signing but I feel we could have signed players that were less of a risk and could make an impact this season.

For example C Woods, already been on loan this season in this division and shown he can score at this level, he would be that big striker we are missing,

Sheppard could be the next Doyle, but I feel hes looks very similar to our other strikers (my opinion been based on a few you tube videos so could be wrong.)

I dont think our current strikers are that bad, its just the midfielders are not creating enough behind them, I think a winger or creative centre midfielder is more important to sign.

West Stand Man
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3106
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 08:37
Location: Working my nuts off during early retirement

Re: NO LONGER A RUMOUR - Karl Sheppard

by West Stand Man » 12 Jan 2012 20:33

Can someone remind me how much we 'wasted' on Brett Williams and Baseya?


User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: NO LONGER A RUMOUR - Karl Sheppard

by Ian Royal » 12 Jan 2012 20:36

West Stand Man Can someone remind me how much we 'wasted' on Brett Williams and Baseya?


>£0

User avatar
cmonurz
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 12384
Joined: 21 Apr 2004 22:50
Location: Nob nob nob nob nob nob

Re: The Lord is Our Sheppard

by cmonurz » 12 Jan 2012 21:02

Svlad Cjelli
FiNeRaIn You are surprisingly mute on the earlier debate. I also forgot to add fae, henry and cox transfer deals in there. I'll accept your revoking of the made up 25 million you posted and accept the apology of accusing me of doing just that.


Your completely imaging any apology - because you aint getting one from me. I still disute your figures.


Given Finerain has listed £40m worth of transfers, what exactly are you disputing?

User avatar
ZacNaloen
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7239
Joined: 13 Oct 2008 13:34
Location: 'If atheism is a religion, then bald is a hair color.' -Mark Schnitzius

Re: NO LONGER A RUMOUR - Karl Sheppard

by ZacNaloen » 12 Jan 2012 21:43

Considering the figures behind most of our transfers aren't public, i'm not sure how FineRain got those figures beyond the medias own speculation.

However, regardless of the fee's we recieve you can see from the clubs accounts how much is spent. And every penny is accounted for. We still spend more than we earn in fact. That others can still yet spend more comes down to the simple fact their owners are either loaded or not in the least bit concerned about the future of the club.

Ours is slightly loaded, but more concerned about the long term future than short term success. You can debate the rest merits of the approaches to your hearts content, but it seems to me that we are competing just fine by our method.

User avatar
Friday's Legacy
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3172
Joined: 31 May 2011 17:46
Location: http://oddschanger.com/

Re: NO LONGER A RUMOUR - Karl Sheppard

by Friday's Legacy » 12 Jan 2012 21:53

Ian Royal
West Stand Man Can someone remind me how much we 'wasted' on Brett Williams and Baseya?


>£0


whilst i disagree these two haven't worked out (they both need time), you have to bare in mind signing on fees and wages, ian. neither should be judged yet.


User avatar
FiNeRaIn
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 6231
Joined: 22 Jul 2004 17:44
Location: Los Angeles

Re: NO LONGER A RUMOUR - Karl Sheppard

by FiNeRaIn » 12 Jan 2012 22:16

ZacNaloen Considering the figures behind most of our transfers aren't public, i'm not sure how FineRain got those figures beyond the medias own speculation.


Umm, not " beyond" the media own speculation at all. I didn't even add in Fae's transfee fee or Seols as I didn't know...despite the speculation fae was in 3 million. So revoke that nonsense please.

Your point also works in terms of fee's paid then, so when you all claim mills was 2 mill, gorks 900k,etc we'll just take some of that off as its media nonsense. :roll:

User avatar
ZacNaloen
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7239
Joined: 13 Oct 2008 13:34
Location: 'If atheism is a religion, then bald is a hair color.' -Mark Schnitzius

Re: NO LONGER A RUMOUR - Karl Sheppard

by ZacNaloen » 12 Jan 2012 22:43

FiNeRaIn
ZacNaloen Considering the figures behind most of our transfers aren't public, i'm not sure how FineRain got those figures beyond the medias own speculation.


Umm, not " beyond" the media own speculation at all. I didn't even add in Fae's transfee fee or Seols as I didn't know...despite the speculation fae was in 3 million. So revoke that nonsense please.

Your point also works in terms of fee's paid then, so when you all claim mills was 2 mill, gorks 900k,etc we'll just take some of that off as its media nonsense. :roll:


So all those fee's come from official club sources and aren't gleaned from newspapers?

You seem to think I give a crap how much the club pays for players. The club can pay whatever it wants and charge whatever it wants. The comments from those of your opinion always boil down to "where has the money gone", in that context the only thing that matters is the net values on the clubs accounts. Which quite clearly show where all the money went. Wages.

You could then argue that we only buy cheap players so why are we paying so much in wage?

The answer is that we look for players capable of more, sign them on and if they prove themselves they quite promptly get a renegotiated contract on a higher wage. Those players that don't make it stay on the bargain contract.

I've seen the pattern often enough to spot it.

I also don't think the logic follows that bargain = rubbish. Sometimes players just end up at the wrong club with the wrong manager.

With the case of this signing, it's a free because he's at the end of his contract not because he's rubbish. So why transfer fee's are even being discussed here I don't know.

Snowball
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 20777
Joined: 02 Jan 2009 18:35

Re: NO LONGER A RUMOUR - Karl Sheppard

by Snowball » 12 Jan 2012 22:47

Moneyball


How many clubs do better than Reading FC in the transfer market?

User avatar
RG30
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6183
Joined: 26 Jul 2005 20:42

Re: NO LONGER A RUMOUR - Karl Sheppard

by RG30 » 13 Jan 2012 00:03

Reading continually punch above their weight when it comes to the selling of players. No other club at this level could match the transfer fees we have raked in for players. Recruitment wise we have done well under McDermott with players who come straight into the side to do a job (Harte, Griffin, Gorkss) but haven't achieved as much in recent seasons with the young and upcoming talent who we deem worthy of a punt on. The problem is we have a chairman who is unwilling to bankroll any new signings which makes it harder for McDermott and we still remain among the top 6 clubs in the Championship for wages (dependant on who you believe) to remain competitive.


Mr Angry
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5960
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 16:05
Location: South Oxfordshire

Re: NO LONGER A RUMOUR - Karl Sheppard

by Mr Angry » 13 Jan 2012 07:30

Welcome to Reading Karl Sheppard, and I hope you have a long and succesful career here.

User avatar
royal67
Member
Posts: 613
Joined: 03 Jun 2011 10:30
Location: Zummerzet

Re: NO LONGER A RUMOUR - Karl Sheppard

by royal67 » 13 Jan 2012 08:26

Mr Angry Welcome to Reading Karl Sheppard, and I hope you have a long and succesful career here.



Well said that man......

User avatar
ZacNaloen
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7239
Joined: 13 Oct 2008 13:34
Location: 'If atheism is a religion, then bald is a hair color.' -Mark Schnitzius

Re: NO LONGER A RUMOUR - Karl Sheppard

by ZacNaloen » 13 Jan 2012 08:35

Hear Hear

User avatar
melonhead
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 14230
Joined: 30 Jul 2010 15:36
Location: on a thorn

Re: The Lord is Our Sheppard

by melonhead » 13 Jan 2012 09:23

Hoop Blah
melonhead didnt we sign a czech and malian intl in 2008 jan?


Kebe, as a £400k gamble from the French second division was another cheap gamble. To call him a Malian international is a bit of a laugh too, he couldn't even get in their side then or still now.

I know we were short on right wingers but he was very unlikely to be a strengthening signing at the time. An opinion that was proven absolutely correct.



i was kind of joking about kebe tbf

but coppell obviously thought marek would improve the side and help us play a little more football

User avatar
melonhead
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 14230
Joined: 30 Jul 2010 15:36
Location: on a thorn

Re: The Lord is Our Sheppard

by melonhead » 13 Jan 2012 09:24

FiNeRaIn
JoebyRFC or we will ruin his potential by having no creative cm to give him anything to feed off


nonsense, we have xavi and iniesta in the middle some would have you believe!



i cant think of a single person whos said anything close to that

User avatar
melonhead
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 14230
Joined: 30 Jul 2010 15:36
Location: on a thorn

Re: The Lord is Our Sheppard

by melonhead » 13 Jan 2012 09:26

FiNeRaIn
Svlad Cjelli
FiNeRaIn You are surprisingly mute on the earlier debate. I also forgot to add fae, henry and cox transfer deals in there. I'll accept your revoking of the made up 25 million you posted and accept the apology of accusing me of doing just that.


Your completely imaging any apology - because you aint getting one from me. I still disute your figures.


Dispute all you want, you're been proven wrong.



:lol:

Still debating the 40 million, or are you going to claim that the media were all wrong regarding the transfer fee's hmm?



:lol:



i love you guys

User avatar
floyd__streete
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 8326
Joined: 19 Jan 2005 18:03
Location: ARREST RAY ILSLEY.

Re: NO LONGER A RUMOUR - Karl Sheppard

by floyd__streete » 13 Jan 2012 09:28

Ian Royal That's why there's a fair few questioning this. It's not a case of saying don't look for the buried gems. Or we shouldn't have signed him. It's more that we've signed several we shouldn't have bothered with already and we need to lose some of the obssession we're developing with hunting out these gems.

If we hadn't wasted time and money on the likes of Baseya and Brett Williams, players who were never going to make it here, and who I believe are either older, or have far worse scoring records... or both, there would be a lot less concern.


Bloody hell - I agree with every single word of a post written by my gr8 m8 Ian Royal. Bring the end of the world forward by a few hundred days, the apocalypse cometh.

441 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Crusader Royal, Google [Bot], rabidbee, South Coast Royal, stealthpapes and 238 guests

It is currently 14 Nov 2024 13:31