by Scrappy » 14 Jan 2012 23:57
by FiNeRaIn » 15 Jan 2012 12:26
moo He's alright.
by Snowball » 15 Jan 2012 12:34
FiNeRaInmoo He's alright.
This, it never ceases to amaze me the fact everyone is either Pele...or they are shit. Over on the other thread Simon Church is being made out to be the worst player at the club whereas Jem Karacan is some god among men. The truth is much more towards the middle in both cases.
by FiNeRaIn » 15 Jan 2012 12:45
by Snowball » 15 Jan 2012 12:47
FiNeRaIn Not by you maybe, but have you read other peoples comments on him? He is nowhere NEAR as bad as many make out. Its pathetic.
by toppy » 15 Jan 2012 12:52
melonhead you know nothing Friday s legacy - nor do i
we lost 5 million last set of accounts, and then sold 9 millions worth of players, while spending 1.8, so
depending on how much money weve spunked on wages we could be fine-especially as gates have been good this year.
by Wimb » 15 Jan 2012 12:58
by winchester_royal » 15 Jan 2012 13:06
FiNeRaIn Not by you maybe, but have you read other peoples comments on him? He is nowhere NEAR as bad as many make out. Its pathetic.
by Royalee » 15 Jan 2012 13:28
by Snowball » 15 Jan 2012 13:40
by Snowball » 15 Jan 2012 13:41
by Maguire » 15 Jan 2012 13:43
by Ian Royal » 15 Jan 2012 13:47
Wimb Good performance from Jem yesterday and he continues to have a solid season.
He's been good, but the potential is there for him to be even better. Even if he turns into a 6-8 goal a season midfielder his value would be SO SO much more to this team.
Maguire Tough tackling? He's nine stone wet through.
This might surprise you, but i think that's spot on. I think he'd be a better full back than midfielder. But we need him at midfield more and it would take him at least a little while to convert.snowball And (just tossing this out there) much as I love him in midfield he would be the
most energetic tough-tackling, bundle of energy overlapping fullback EVER.
by West Stand Man » 15 Jan 2012 13:49
Maguire Tough tackling? He's nine stone wet through.
He's an alright player, not amazing, not terrible, just alright
by FiNeRaIn » 15 Jan 2012 14:16
winchester_royalFiNeRaIn Not by you maybe, but have you read other peoples comments on him? He is nowhere NEAR as bad as many make out. Its pathetic.
LOLz, yes, because you never deal in extremes do you FR?
by winchester_royal » 15 Jan 2012 14:19
FiNeRaInwinchester_royalFiNeRaIn Not by you maybe, but have you read other peoples comments on him? He is nowhere NEAR as bad as many make out. Its pathetic.
LOLz, yes, because you never deal in extremes do you FR?
Zzzz once again your issue is with the poster and not the post itself. They should turn off the ability to see names of posters for the day and we might see the quality of posts go up.
by FiNeRaIn » 15 Jan 2012 14:26
by melonhead » 15 Jan 2012 14:43
toppymelonhead you know nothing Friday s legacy - nor do i
we lost 5 million last set of accounts, and then sold 9 millions worth of players, while spending 1.8, so
depending on how much money weve spunked on wages we could be fine-especially as gates have been good this year.
The 5m was accountancy BS, but saying the value of the players was 5m less than last yr. This is due contracts closer to expiring etc.
by Ian Royal » 15 Jan 2012 14:45
by melonhead » 15 Jan 2012 14:46
Users browsing this forum: Mr Angry and 272 guests