rfc2001 This investment will enable us to hold onto players now as opposed to spend spend spend. So when our next SIG LONG DOYLE et al comes through we will keep hold them. Which is more pleasing than spending on random's.
^this + 1,000,000
by Drew_3 » 21 Jan 2012 17:10
rfc2001 This investment will enable us to hold onto players now as opposed to spend spend spend. So when our next SIG LONG DOYLE et al comes through we will keep hold them. Which is more pleasing than spending on random's.
by Friday's Legacy » 21 Jan 2012 17:14
TheMaraudingDog Wow. Some very divvy and excitable clueless Reading fans out there.
Im actually very at the lack of caution being shown here.
More often than not new owners coming in with promises leave the club in the shit.
by RoyalBlue » 21 Jan 2012 17:15
Drew_3rfc2001 This investment will enable us to hold onto players now as opposed to spend spend spend. So when our next SIG LONG DOYLE et al comes through we will keep hold them. Which is more pleasing than spending on random's.
^this + 1,000,000
by rhroyal » 21 Jan 2012 17:19
Drew_3rfc2001 This investment will enable us to hold onto players now as opposed to spend spend spend. So when our next SIG LONG DOYLE et al comes through we will keep hold them. Which is more pleasing than spending on random's.
^this + 1,000,000
by Big Ern » 21 Jan 2012 17:19
PremAddict Any confirmation on who TSI is? Too many pages on this post to check.
by Drew_3 » 21 Jan 2012 17:21
RoyalBlue For a long time some of us have been saying that we can't keep selling our best players and that if we did we would only go one way.
The Madjeski followers jumped on us, accused us of high treason and told us we were completely wrong.
Well guess what - freed of the shackles, McDermott has just spoken out. Amongst the things he said were:
'You can't keep selling your best players. If you do, you will only go in one direction.'
'All I ever wanted was to be allowed to keep my best players.'
'I am sure that if we had been in a position to keep Shane Long last year, he would have stayed because of my relationship with him and if Shane Long had still been with us, where do you think we would have been now.'
But, Brian, you must be wrong because the Madejski fan club have said so.
by muddyfeet » 21 Jan 2012 17:21
by Royal Lady » 21 Jan 2012 17:23
RoyalBlue For a long time some of us have been saying that we can't keep selling our best players and that if we did we would only go one way.
The Madjeski followers jumped on us, accused us of high treason and told us we were completely wrong.
Well guess what - freed of the shackles, McDermott has just spoken out. Amongst the things he said were:
'You can't keep selling your best players. If you do, you will only go in one direction.'
'All I ever wanted was to be allowed to keep my best players.'
'I am sure that if we had been in a position to keep Shane Long last year, he would have stayed because of my relationship with him and if Shane Long had still been with us, where do you think we would have been now.'
But, Brian, you must be wrong because the Madejski fan club have said so.
by Norfolk Royal » 21 Jan 2012 17:26
Big ErnPremAddict Any confirmation on who TSI is? Too many pages on this post to check.
Just done a bit of a search of TSI, can't find much but apparently the CEO is this guy
by CentiaRoyal » 21 Jan 2012 17:26
by loyalroyaldaz » 21 Jan 2012 17:27
by sandman » 21 Jan 2012 17:27
muddyfeet McD didn't sound overly excited.
Also bit when he said he could have got Long to stay but we had to sell
by RoyalBlue » 21 Jan 2012 17:28
Drew_3RoyalBlue For a long time some of us have been saying that we can't keep selling our best players and that if we did we would only go one way.
The Madjeski followers jumped on us, accused us of high treason and told us we were completely wrong.
Well guess what - freed of the shackles, McDermott has just spoken out. Amongst the things he said were:
'You can't keep selling your best players. If you do, you will only go in one direction.'
'All I ever wanted was to be allowed to keep my best players.'
'I am sure that if we had been in a position to keep Shane Long last year, he would have stayed because of my relationship with him and if Shane Long had still been with us, where do you think we would have been now.'
But, Brian, you must be wrong because the Madejski fan club have said so.
I assume he said this in the post match interview?
by RoyalBlue » 21 Jan 2012 17:32
sandmanmuddyfeet McD didn't sound overly excited.
Also bit when he said he could have got Long to stay but we had to sell
Might have something to do with the match his team had just lost.
by CentiaRoyal » 21 Jan 2012 17:33
RoyalBlueDrew_3RoyalBlue For a long time some of us have been saying that we can't keep selling our best players and that if we did we would only go one way.
The Madjeski followers jumped on us, accused us of high treason and told us we were completely wrong.
Well guess what - freed of the shackles, McDermott has just spoken out. Amongst the things he said were:
'You can't keep selling your best players. If you do, you will only go in one direction.'
'All I ever wanted was to be allowed to keep my best players.'
'I am sure that if we had been in a position to keep Shane Long last year, he would have stayed because of my relationship with him and if Shane Long had still been with us, where do you think we would have been now.'
But, Brian, you must be wrong because the Madejski fan club have said so.
I assume he said this in the post match interview?
Yes.
by Royal Lady » 21 Jan 2012 17:35
by moo » 21 Jan 2012 17:35
by RoyalBlue » 21 Jan 2012 17:36
by sandman » 21 Jan 2012 17:37
RoyalBluesandmanmuddyfeet McD didn't sound overly excited.
Also bit when he said he could have got Long to stay but we had to sell
Might have something to do with the match his team had just lost.
Oh yeah!
His team has lots plenty of times and produced a good number of equally p*ss poor performances but he's never said anything like this before. And if Madejski has only retained 49% he can't sack him for airing his frustrations.
LOL at BBC Radio Berks who think that because the new investors won't have 75% they don't control the club. True, they can't force Madejski to sell his balance of the shares but 51% is bigger than 49% and for a reason!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 285 guests