by melonhead » 23 Jan 2012 14:56
by Red » 23 Jan 2012 15:04
Ian Royal My main concern isn't really TSI coming in and running us badly. It's TSI coming in and getting us promoted, taking the option of buying out SJM completely at a good price and then flogging us to any old tosspot for a big old profit as a Premier League club.
Even if Brendy is wrong and it's £40m for half the club, that takes us up to about £80m for the whole club when we were supposedly valued at £100m when in the Premier League. That could conceivably be £10m profit in two years even injecting a further £10m in wages and transfers.
That ain't bad is it?
Fingers crossed though.
by cmonurz » 23 Jan 2012 15:05
Ian Royal My main concern isn't really TSI coming in and running us badly. It's TSI coming in and getting us promoted, taking the option of buying out SJM completely at a good price and then flogging us to any old tosspot for a big old profit as a Premier League club.
Even if Brendy is wrong and it's £40m for half the club, that takes us up to about £80m for the whole club when we were supposedly valued at £100m when in the Premier League. That could conceivably be £10m profit in two years even injecting a further £10m in wages and transfers.
That ain't bad is it?
Fingers crossed though.
by The Rouge » 23 Jan 2012 15:06
Ian Royal My main concern isn't really TSI coming in and running us badly. It's TSI coming in and getting us promoted, taking the option of buying out SJM completely at a good price and then flogging us to any old tosspot for a big old profit as a Premier League club.
Even if Brendy is wrong and it's £40m for half the club, that takes us up to about £80m for the whole club when we were supposedly valued at £100m when in the Premier League. That could conceivably be £10m profit in two years even injecting a further £10m in wages and transfers.
That ain't bad is it?
Fingers crossed though.
by Maguire » 23 Jan 2012 15:06
by The Rouge » 23 Jan 2012 15:08
by winchester_royal » 23 Jan 2012 15:14
by Ian Royal » 23 Jan 2012 15:18
by Silver Fox » 23 Jan 2012 15:19
by Arch » 23 Jan 2012 15:21
Silver Fox I didn't realise the intended purpose of the forum is to go on and on like you know anything about running a football club becuase you've played Football manager
by who are ya? » 23 Jan 2012 15:23
by Arch » 23 Jan 2012 15:24
by Platypuss » 23 Jan 2012 15:28
Arch Still barely a fifth of the views of "Media don't like us". Gotta increase traffic flow, TBM. If I recall right, "Sidwell wants Premier dividend" was about 150k as well.
by Bandini » 23 Jan 2012 15:30
Silver Fox I didn't realise the intended purpose of the forum is to go on and on like you know anything about running a football club becuase you've played Football manager
by who are ya? » 23 Jan 2012 15:33
by winchester_royal » 23 Jan 2012 15:36
Silver Fox I didn't realise the intended purpose of the forum is to go on and on like you know anything about running a football club becuase you've played Football manager
by Z175 » 23 Jan 2012 15:37
who are ya? What was the manager game that you were able to take bungs, which always lead to being sacked
by RobRoyal » 23 Jan 2012 15:39
Silver Fox I didn't realise the intended purpose of the forum is to go on and on like you know anything about running a football club becuase you've played Football manager
by Harpers So Solid Crew » 23 Jan 2012 15:42
by Maguire » 23 Jan 2012 15:43
winchester_royalSilver Fox I didn't realise the intended purpose of the forum is to go on and on like you know anything about running a football club becuase you've played Football manager
It's not, the intended purpose of the forum is to give Reading fans the opportunity to talk about the football club.
Might I suggest that given that this takeover is one of the biggest events for the last decade or so at this club, that it might prompt a fair amount of discussion over the merits and dangers involving foreign takeovers.
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 163 guests