Thames Sports Investment

5145 posts
User avatar
melonhead
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 14230
Joined: 30 Jul 2010 15:36
Location: on a thorn

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by melonhead » 23 Jan 2012 14:56

im not saying its fact- just inferring from what ive read

User avatar
Red
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1288
Joined: 11 Jun 2010 22:23

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by Red » 23 Jan 2012 15:04

Ian Royal My main concern isn't really TSI coming in and running us badly. It's TSI coming in and getting us promoted, taking the option of buying out SJM completely at a good price and then flogging us to any old tosspot for a big old profit as a Premier League club.

Even if Brendy is wrong and it's £40m for half the club, that takes us up to about £80m for the whole club when we were supposedly valued at £100m when in the Premier League. That could conceivably be £10m profit in two years even injecting a further £10m in wages and transfers.

That ain't bad is it?

Fingers crossed though.

We would've only been valued at £100m if someone had paid that price for us.

Say what you like about SJM but he's a savvy businessman, and we all know success (promotion) cannot be guaranteed simply by injecting a few quid here and there.

User avatar
cmonurz
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 12384
Joined: 21 Apr 2004 22:50
Location: Nob nob nob nob nob nob

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by cmonurz » 23 Jan 2012 15:05

Ian Royal My main concern isn't really TSI coming in and running us badly. It's TSI coming in and getting us promoted, taking the option of buying out SJM completely at a good price and then flogging us to any old tosspot for a big old profit as a Premier League club.

Even if Brendy is wrong and it's £40m for half the club, that takes us up to about £80m for the whole club when we were supposedly valued at £100m when in the Premier League. That could conceivably be £10m profit in two years even injecting a further £10m in wages and transfers.

That ain't bad is it?

Fingers crossed though.


I think trying to infer a potential profit from an unrealistic level of transfers based on a valuation of the club that is approximate and a few years old is a complete waste of time.

User avatar
The Rouge
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2560
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 16:51
Location: Giving it the Double Djokovic

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by The Rouge » 23 Jan 2012 15:06

Ian Royal My main concern isn't really TSI coming in and running us badly. It's TSI coming in and getting us promoted, taking the option of buying out SJM completely at a good price and then flogging us to any old tosspot for a big old profit as a Premier League club.

Even if Brendy is wrong and it's £40m for half the club, that takes us up to about £80m for the whole club when we were supposedly valued at £100m when in the Premier League. That could conceivably be £10m profit in two years even injecting a further £10m in wages and transfers.

That ain't bad is it?

Fingers crossed though.


I imagine the difference between 51% and 49% stake would be more than the pro-rata'd amount so the overall club would be less than £80m in that sense if the figures are all to be believed. I personally think the journos just pick a number and re-report it as its a better story with a number in it.

User avatar
Maguire
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 12084
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 12:26

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by Maguire » 23 Jan 2012 15:06

I love the succession of posts on this thread which amount to little more than a horde of galloping belmonts extracting endless hidden meanings from bland PR messages.


User avatar
The Rouge
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2560
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 16:51
Location: Giving it the Double Djokovic

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by The Rouge » 23 Jan 2012 15:08

Good use of 'horde of galloping belmonts'.

User avatar
winchester_royal
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 11160
Joined: 28 Aug 2007 21:32
Location: How many Spaniards does it take to change a bulb? Just Juan.

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by winchester_royal » 23 Jan 2012 15:14

Ahhh, every couple of months there's an AE invasion of the team board where they spend a couple of days patronising everyone and overusing the word 'belmont' before returning to their haven to have a good chuckle at those losers who use the forum for its intended purpose.

Welcome comrades!

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by Ian Royal » 23 Jan 2012 15:18

Just trying to point out that there is a way to make money out of owning football clubs. It's to buy a Championship club and get them promoted quickly, then sell a Premier League one. Obviously the figures themselves are meaningless... it's the basic principle that stands up, if it can be made to work by getting that promotion.

I trust SJM to sell to someone who will take decent care of us, but I have no reason to then trust that person(s) to do the same right now.

User avatar
Silver Fox
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 26211
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 10:02
Location: From the Andes to the indies in my undies

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by Silver Fox » 23 Jan 2012 15:19

I didn't realise the intended purpose of the forum is to go on and on like you know anything about running a football club becuase you've played Football manager


User avatar
Arch
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 4082
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 23:35
Location: USA! USA! USA!

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by Arch » 23 Jan 2012 15:21

Silver Fox I didn't realise the intended purpose of the forum is to go on and on like you know anything about running a football club becuase you've played Football manager

Well.... what else?

User avatar
who are ya?
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2629
Joined: 18 Apr 2004 16:51
Location: Bracknell

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by who are ya? » 23 Jan 2012 15:23

To talk shit to other Bel Montes?

User avatar
Arch
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 4082
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 23:35
Location: USA! USA! USA!

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by Arch » 23 Jan 2012 15:24

Still barely a fifth of the views of "Media don't like us". Gotta increase traffic flow, TBM. If I recall right, "Sidwell wants Premier dividend" was about 150k as well.

User avatar
Platypuss
Hob Nob Moderator
Posts: 8203
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 21:46
Location: No one cares about your creative hub, so get your fukcin' hedge cut

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by Platypuss » 23 Jan 2012 15:28

Arch Still barely a fifth of the views of "Media don't like us". Gotta increase traffic flow, TBM. If I recall right, "Sidwell wants Premier dividend" was about 150k as well.


Sort by replies: "Watching Reading in the Prem - an online guide" is 200k+

Not increasing too fast now, mind. :(


User avatar
Bandini
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3761
Joined: 03 Sep 2010 16:01
Location: No one must know I dropped my glasses in the toilet.

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by Bandini » 23 Jan 2012 15:30

Silver Fox I didn't realise the intended purpose of the forum is to go on and on like you know anything about running a football club becuase you've played Football manager


Agreed. It's only a grounding in Premier Manager 2 which can really prepare you for the importance of getting advertising hoarding contracts in place.

User avatar
who are ya?
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2629
Joined: 18 Apr 2004 16:51
Location: Bracknell

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by who are ya? » 23 Jan 2012 15:33

What was the manager game that you were able to take bungs, which always lead to being sacked

User avatar
winchester_royal
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 11160
Joined: 28 Aug 2007 21:32
Location: How many Spaniards does it take to change a bulb? Just Juan.

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by winchester_royal » 23 Jan 2012 15:36

Silver Fox I didn't realise the intended purpose of the forum is to go on and on like you know anything about running a football club becuase you've played Football manager


It's not, the intended purpose of the forum is to give Reading fans the opportunity to talk about the football club.

Might I suggest that given that this takeover is one of the biggest events for the last decade or so at this club, that it might prompt a fair amount of discussion over the merits and dangers involving foreign takeovers.

User avatar
Z175
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1704
Joined: 19 Jul 2004 18:52
Location: All time championship championes

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by Z175 » 23 Jan 2012 15:37

who are ya? What was the manager game that you were able to take bungs, which always lead to being sacked


Harry Rednapp's Ultimate Soccer Manager

User avatar
RobRoyal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2900
Joined: 26 Apr 2004 16:11
Location: Surely you're joking?

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by RobRoyal » 23 Jan 2012 15:39

Silver Fox I didn't realise the intended purpose of the forum is to go on and on like you know anything about running a football club becuase you've played Football manager


Man, you've been here 8 years. What took you so long?

User avatar
Harpers So Solid Crew
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5273
Joined: 06 Jul 2004 08:39
Location: enjoying the money

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by Harpers So Solid Crew » 23 Jan 2012 15:42

as for the idea that a quick £10 can be made by gaining Promotion for one thing £10m is not much to the mega rich, and second who are these buyers that want to snap up any old Prem club, how much was paid for Blackburn?

User avatar
Maguire
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 12084
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 12:26

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by Maguire » 23 Jan 2012 15:43

winchester_royal
Silver Fox I didn't realise the intended purpose of the forum is to go on and on like you know anything about running a football club becuase you've played Football manager


It's not, the intended purpose of the forum is to give Reading fans the opportunity to talk about the football club.

Might I suggest that given that this takeover is one of the biggest events for the last decade or so at this club, that it might prompt a fair amount of discussion over the merits and dangers involving foreign takeovers.


The point isn't that there's a thread at all (=understandable) but that it's 80% full of uttershit.

Why, for example, do people argue about how much money we'll get given this month for transfers? Nobody knows, nobody has any idea whatsoever, it's all just bollocks.

Likewise arguing about how much Madejski's remaining share will go for. You don't have any idea. None of you. So don't be surprised if all the posturing gets laughed at.

5145 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], RG30 and 125 guests

It is currently 10 Nov 2024 21:06