by 1871 Royal » 25 Jan 2012 16:47
by who are ya? » 25 Jan 2012 16:50
Pepe the Horseman http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yi8xih9UnlU&feature=related
by winchester_royal » 25 Jan 2012 16:58
Royal Lady I hope this Emile Heskey thing on FB is a load of rollocks.
by loyalroyal4life » 25 Jan 2012 17:04
by Barry the bird boggler » 25 Jan 2012 17:07
by Bandini » 25 Jan 2012 17:10
by FiNeRaIn » 25 Jan 2012 17:12
by winchester_royal » 25 Jan 2012 17:14
by Vision » 25 Jan 2012 17:19
Royal Lady You don't think Hammond and SJM TOLD McD he HAD to sell them? That's the vibe I got after both sales tbf....
by Friday's Legacy » 25 Jan 2012 17:31
by Platypuss » 25 Jan 2012 17:48
Hoop BlahSilver FoxHoop Blah I've always felt that the way we didn't chase a European place in '07.
Which bit of that are you struggling with SF?
As a club we didn't ask to be considered for the Inter-Toto (European competition and a route into the UEFA Cup) and Coppell didn't want to qualify for the UEFA Cup through the league position because he was too worried about what the extra demands would do.
How much Coppell's lack of interest effected us over the last few games is hard to tell but I think both he, and certainly Dillion, have admitted that Coppell didn't want to qualify.
by Hoop Blah » 25 Jan 2012 17:50
by Ark Royal » 25 Jan 2012 17:58
Bandini I understand that he's looking at a player-couch position.
It would certainly suit someone like Heskey who has always been a student of the game.
by Man Friday » 25 Jan 2012 18:40
loyalroyal4life
Hesk and Roberts Upfront, what a mouth watering combo!
by Man Friday » 25 Jan 2012 18:44
Ian RoyalMan Friday So, all those years that Madejski "invested" in the club turned out to be loans. Anybody can loan money. I'd have more respect had he invested as he implied he was doing. Could it be that the reason he struggled to sell before was that no one was prepared to repay his loans? Very, very disappointing. Typical false messiah stuff I guess.
"investments" are things where you put in money expecting to get it back and then some, so he's done exactly what he's always said he's done and what the accounts have always shown. Normally you'd take interest while you're doing it as well. You won't find many people willing to put £30m of their own money into a football club for 20 years when they could be using it themselves, even if they might get back eventually.
You didn't really think Madejski had just given Reading Football club £30m did you! That's priceless!
by Man Friday » 25 Jan 2012 18:49
philMMan Friday So, all those years that Madejski "invested" in the club turned out to be loans. Anybody can loan money. I'd have more respect had he invested as he implied he was doing. Could it be that the reason he struggled to sell before was that no one was prepared to repay his loans? Very, very disappointing. Typical false messiah stuff I guess.
You obviously don't know much about limited companies. If you put money in you have to do it as a Directors loan with a reasonable interest rate, or buy equity. You can't "gift" it in. The tax man won't allow that.
by Ian Royal » 25 Jan 2012 19:24
Man FridayIan RoyalMan Friday So, all those years that Madejski "invested" in the club turned out to be loans. Anybody can loan money. I'd have more respect had he invested as he implied he was doing. Could it be that the reason he struggled to sell before was that no one was prepared to repay his loans? Very, very disappointing. Typical false messiah stuff I guess.
"investments" are things where you put in money expecting to get it back and then some, so he's done exactly what he's always said he's done and what the accounts have always shown. Normally you'd take interest while you're doing it as well. You won't find many people willing to put £30m of their own money into a football club for 20 years when they could be using it themselves, even if they might get back eventually.
You didn't really think Madejski had just given Reading Football club £30m did you! That's priceless!
Priceless in the real world but that's what happens in football. Owners pump in their own money to inflate their egos (ala Blackburn in the 90s). They don't "loan" money to the clubs that they own. If they did, when the City owners wanted out, the club would be completely and utterly stuffed/fukked/destroyed, you name it.
by RoyalBlue » 25 Jan 2012 19:25
by RoyalBlue » 25 Jan 2012 19:50
by philM » 25 Jan 2012 19:57
Man FridayphilMMan Friday So, all those years that Madejski "invested" in the club turned out to be loans. Anybody can loan money. I'd have more respect had he invested as he implied he was doing. Could it be that the reason he struggled to sell before was that no one was prepared to repay his loans? Very, very disappointing. Typical false messiah stuff I guess.
You obviously don't know much about limited companies. If you put money in you have to do it as a Directors loan with a reasonable interest rate, or buy equity. You can't "gift" it in. The tax man won't allow that.
You sound like you know what you're talking about but I suspect you don't. (Don't worry, I work with quite a few people like that.) What's happening at Man City at the moment then? They're not loans.
Users browsing this forum: Sutekh and 169 guests