by Hoop Blah » 26 Jan 2012 11:57
by Silver Fox » 26 Jan 2012 12:03
by Royal Lady » 26 Jan 2012 12:08
by Dare to Dr£am » 26 Jan 2012 12:11
Royal Lady I don't know where else to put this, so forgive me - but, is Roberts a loan or have we bought him? Is it right we've got Tomasz on a free? How much is Karleigh "Girl's name" Osborne going to cost us?
by Simon's Church » 26 Jan 2012 12:12
Royal Lady I don't know where else to put this, so forgive me - but, is Roberts a loan or have we bought him? Is it right we've got Tomasz on a free? How much is Karleigh "Girl's name" Osborne going to cost us?
by Royal Lady » 26 Jan 2012 12:13
by Dare to Dr£am » 26 Jan 2012 12:40
Royal Lady Oh I see. I thought the fees had already been mentioned. My bad. If Roberts is a loan til end of season, I doubt we've actually spent much money on getting them here though - I presume Roberts' wages take up the bulk of the money given by TSI.
by Royal Lady » 26 Jan 2012 12:54
Dare to Dr£amRoyal Lady Oh I see. I thought the fees had already been mentioned. My bad. If Roberts is a loan til end of season, I doubt we've actually spent much money on getting them here though - I presume Roberts' wages take up the bulk of the money given by TSI.
I doubt very much if Blackburn were paying him more than 20k a week, but if we pick up the full tab then there's £500,000 plus any loan fee to Blackburn.
by johnnym » 26 Jan 2012 12:57
Royal LadyDare to Dr£amRoyal Lady Oh I see. I thought the fees had already been mentioned. My bad. If Roberts is a loan til end of season, I doubt we've actually spent much money on getting them here though - I presume Roberts' wages take up the bulk of the money given by TSI.
I doubt very much if Blackburn were paying him more than 20k a week, but if we pick up the full tab then there's £500,000 plus any loan fee to Blackburn.
I suppose what I am getting at is that we've not actually spent much money at all on these 3 - should we get them all - so it's not like TSI are being generous....
by Royal Lady » 26 Jan 2012 13:00
by Royal Rother » 26 Jan 2012 13:01
Royal LadyDare to Dr£amRoyal Lady Oh I see. I thought the fees had already been mentioned. My bad. If Roberts is a loan til end of season, I doubt we've actually spent much money on getting them here though - I presume Roberts' wages take up the bulk of the money given by TSI.
I doubt very much if Blackburn were paying him more than 20k a week, but if we pick up the full tab then there's £500,000 plus any loan fee to Blackburn.
I suppose what I am getting at is that we've not actually spent much money at all on these 3 - should we get them all - so it's not like TSI are being generous....
by mr_number » 26 Jan 2012 13:02
Royal LadyDare to Dr£amRoyal Lady Oh I see. I thought the fees had already been mentioned. My bad. If Roberts is a loan til end of season, I doubt we've actually spent much money on getting them here though - I presume Roberts' wages take up the bulk of the money given by TSI.
I doubt very much if Blackburn were paying him more than 20k a week, but if we pick up the full tab then there's £500,000 plus any loan fee to Blackburn.
I suppose what I am getting at is that we've not actually spent much money at all on these 3 - should we get them all - so it's not like TSI are being generous....
by Hoop Blah » 26 Jan 2012 13:04
johnnym TSI said they gave Brian what he asked for. That is just about as generous as you could/should be tbf
by Royal Lady » 26 Jan 2012 13:07
by TFF » 26 Jan 2012 13:11
by johnnym » 26 Jan 2012 13:13
Royal Lady Yes I know they haven't bought the shares yet - but one has to assume that they will be owning 51% within weeks - and much appears to have been made of the "giving Brian money" angle - I'm just saying, it isn't actually very much really! Not to say that it's not good or anything - as SJM obviously wouldn't have given him it anyway.
by mr_number » 26 Jan 2012 13:28
Royal Lady Yes I know they haven't bought the shares yet - but one has to assume that they will be owning 51% within weeks - and much appears to have been made of the "giving Brian money" angle - I'm just saying, it isn't actually very much really! Not to say that it's not good or anything - as SJM obviously wouldn't have given him it anyway.
by Extended-Phenotype » 26 Jan 2012 13:37
by mr_number » 26 Jan 2012 13:40
Extended-Phenotype Roberts, Cywka, Osbourne; this Russian money has come in handy. Now we can buy three times as much SH|T in the transfer window.
by melonhead » 26 Jan 2012 13:40
Royal LadyDare to Dr£amRoyal Lady Oh I see. I thought the fees had already been mentioned. My bad. If Roberts is a loan til end of season, I doubt we've actually spent much money on getting them here though - I presume Roberts' wages take up the bulk of the money given by TSI.
I doubt very much if Blackburn were paying him more than 20k a week, but if we pick up the full tab then there's £500,000 plus any loan fee to Blackburn.
I suppose what I am getting at is that we've not actually spent much money at all on these 3 - should we get them all - so it's not like TSI are being generous....
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 175 guests