TBM
by Simon's Church » 27 Jan 2012 10:08
TBM
by Mr Angry » 27 Jan 2012 11:14
Hoop BlahZammo Lester Piggott went down for a similar offence. Don't think it matters how famous you are if you start fcuking over the Inland Revenue.
Had completely forgotten about that! Did he use his accent as a defence too?
Mr A, thanks for the details provided. It doesn't sound good for him does it!
by Uke » 27 Jan 2012 11:26
by Dare to Dr£am » 27 Jan 2012 11:27
Simon's ChurchTBM
by Wax Jacket » 27 Jan 2012 11:32
by Terminal Boardom » 27 Jan 2012 11:55
Hoop BlahZammo Lester Piggott went down for a similar offence. Don't think it matters how famous you are if you start fcuking over the Inland Revenue.
Had completely forgotten about that! Did he use his accent as a defence too?
Mr A, thanks for the details provided. It doesn't sound good for him does it!
by Geekins » 27 Jan 2012 12:38
by Big Foot » 27 Jan 2012 14:48
by Badger Finger » 27 Jan 2012 16:11
by facaldaqui » 27 Jan 2012 17:23
Uke "You talk to anybody at the football club. I don't write. I couldn't even fill a team sheet in."
Only been a football manager for 29 years though Harry...
by Franchise FC » 27 Jan 2012 18:26
Zammo Lester Piggott went down for a similar offence. Don't think it matters how famous you are if you start fcuking over the Inland Revenue.
by Svlad Cjelli » 27 Jan 2012 19:36
Mr AngryHoop BlahZammo Lester Piggott went down for a similar offence. Don't think it matters how famous you are if you start fcuking over the Inland Revenue.
Had completely forgotten about that! Did he use his accent as a defence too?
Mr A, thanks for the details provided. It doesn't sound good for him does it!
As I said, the wife works in Tax Accounting; even her Spurs-mad colleague reckons 'Arry is going down for this.
What everyone has to realise is that HMRC are relentless; if you have been evading tax and they fiund out, they will put together an utterly water-tight case BEFORE presenting in to the CPS, In other words, if the case comes to trial, they are as positive as they can be of their data and evidence and, whilst I can't find the figures to back this assumption up, I suspect that the % success rate of court cases that they bring is very, very high.
by Uke » 27 Jan 2012 21:02
Svlad CjelliMr Angry As I said, the wife works in Tax Accounting; even her Spurs-mad colleague reckons 'Arry is going down for this.
What everyone has to realise is that HMRC are relentless; if you have been evading tax and they fiund out, they will put together an utterly water-tight case BEFORE presenting in to the CPS, In other words, if the case comes to trial, they are as positive as they can be of their data and evidence and, whilst I can't find the figures to back this assumption up, I suspect that the % success rate of court cases that they bring is very, very high.
Plus HMRC are absolutely out to get football and everyone in it. They hate the Football Creditors Rule and the sums they've lost to football clubs, so agree with all of that - they'll be ruthless and relentness.
And good luck to them - it's our money we're talking about.
by handbags_harris » 27 Jan 2012 21:27
facaldaqui I've always thought Harry wasn't that bright on paperwork. Anyone remember when he played a player in the FA cup who had played in an earlier round while on loan? That was bad enough, but Harry blamed the player for not telling him and kicked him out of the club. I would have expected the manager to know, and if he didn't know, to check.
by Toon Toon Blue army » 27 Jan 2012 22:59
by GreaterTorontoRoyal » 28 Jan 2012 00:07
handbags_harrisfacaldaqui I've always thought Harry wasn't that bright on paperwork. Anyone remember when he played a player in the FA cup who had played in an earlier round while on loan? That was bad enough, but Harry blamed the player for not telling him and kicked him out of the club. I would have expected the manager to know, and if he didn't know, to check.
Samassi Abou I believe?
by Seal » 30 Jan 2012 12:13
by Mr Angry » 30 Jan 2012 13:06
Seal I think he'll get off.
His lawyers are playing a very clever game where they are triangulating every element of this case between Harry, his accountant and Mandaric.
Be difficult to convince a jury beyond reasonable doubt of his guilt.
Also bear in mind this jury will be bored to tears by now. The longer these cases go on, the harder it is to get a conviction from a jury.
Selfishly I want him to get off as he's the best choice for next England manager we have!
by Silver Fox » 30 Jan 2012 13:07
by Dare to Dr£am » 30 Jan 2012 13:08
Mr AngrySeal I think he'll get off.
His lawyers are playing a very clever game where they are triangulating every element of this case between Harry, his accountant and Mandaric.
Be difficult to convince a jury beyond reasonable doubt of his guilt.
Also bear in mind this jury will be bored to tears by now. The longer these cases go on, the harder it is to get a conviction from a jury.
Selfishly I want him to get off as he's the best choice for next England manager we have!
1. Did Mr Redknapp set up an offshore account named Rosie47? YES
2. Did Mr Redknapp put money to the value of approx. £300K into this account? YES
3. When did Mr Redknapp declare this account to HMRC? 2 Months AFTER being arrested for tax evasion
4. Did Mr Redknapp pay income tax on the money deposited into this account? NO
Open and shut.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 63 guests