by tomrfcurz » 31 Jan 2012 11:41
by chilipepper91 » 31 Jan 2012 11:41
by Tony Le Mesmer » 31 Jan 2012 11:44
FiNeRaIn Good backup, but who are we signing to improve the woeful lack of goals and creativity in the side?
by melonhead » 31 Jan 2012 11:46
chilipepper91 http://www.readingfc.co.uk/page/NewsDetail/0,,10306~2594892,00.html
Looks like that could be it for today...
by FiNeRaIn » 31 Jan 2012 11:50
chilipepper91 http://www.readingfc.co.uk/page/NewsDetail/0,,10306~2594892,00.html
Looks like that could be it for today...
by ZacNaloen » 31 Jan 2012 11:51
by FiNeRaIn » 31 Jan 2012 11:53
ZacNaloen We have no cover in central defense FineRain...
*Sorry, Had
by ZacNaloen » 31 Jan 2012 11:54
by melonhead » 31 Jan 2012 11:55
by WoodleyRoyal » 31 Jan 2012 11:56
FiNeRaInchilipepper91 http://www.readingfc.co.uk/page/NewsDetail/0,,10306~2594892,00.html
Looks like that could be it for today...
Not impressed if true. Not particularly motivated to go and watch this current bunch with the one dimensional players lacking creativity on show. Yeah, im negative bla bla bla. But its absolute dross every week at the moment and a young unproven centre mid who derby were happy to let go on a free is not going to change the rhythm for our games, especially when on the bench. Connolly is a good backup signing, he may also play left back but thats not where we are struggling. Our back five is the most solid aspect about out team - the biggest weakness is the midfield by far and the one addition we've added there is NOWHERE near enough im afraid. Happy with roberts signings but lets be honest..he's not going to creative his own through balls and nod in his own crosses from the wing, why can't the management see the obvious weakness and one dimensional play of our midfield? Its really, really worrying.
by FiNeRaIn » 31 Jan 2012 11:56
ZacNaloen If we had an injury in defense would you really have been comfortable with a player who was shit at the beginning of the season and dropped from the team completely and a player who hasn't made a league start?
by melonhead » 31 Jan 2012 11:56
FiNeRaInZacNaloen We have no cover in central defense FineRain...
*Sorry, Had
We did, we had morrison there and also khumalo. Both signed by the club to be cover. Its more important you get your first team sorted before your backup. Surely you understand this?
by Vision » 31 Jan 2012 11:57
FiNeRaInchilipepper91 http://www.readingfc.co.uk/page/NewsDetail/0,,10306~2594892,00.html
Looks like that could be it for today...
Not impressed if true. Not particularly motivated to go and watch this current bunch with the one dimensional players lacking creativity on show. Yeah, im negative bla bla bla. But its absolute dross every week at the moment and a young unproven centre mid who derby were happy to let go on a free is not going to change the rhythm for our games, especially when on the bench. Connolly is a good backup signing, he may also play left back but thats not where we are struggling. Our back five is the most solid aspect about out team - the biggest weakness is the midfield by far and the one addition we've added there is NOWHERE near enough im afraid. Happy with roberts signings but lets be honest..he's not going to creative his own through balls and nod in his own crosses from the wing, why can't the management see the obvious weakness and one dimensional play of our midfield? Its really, really worrying.
by melonhead » 31 Jan 2012 11:57
FiNeRaInZacNaloen If we had an injury in defense would you really have been comfortable with a player who was shit at the beginning of the season and dropped from the team completely and a player who hasn't made a league start?
If it meant we might actually have someone who created chances for our strikers? absofvkinglutely. On the off chance there is an injury, we deal with it at the time. The problem is we don't create chances, that's not being addressed by signing backup to replace other dross backup we signed.
by rfc2001 » 31 Jan 2012 11:58
melonhead dont go then!
i think we all know how you feel by now.dont need to repeat it.
what would it have taken for you to be so excited you stopped whingeing?
by FiNeRaIn » 31 Jan 2012 11:59
melonheadFiNeRaInZacNaloen If we had an injury in defense would you really have been comfortable with a player who was shit at the beginning of the season and dropped from the team completely and a player who hasn't made a league start?
If it meant we might actually have someone who created chances for our strikers? absofvkinglutely. On the off chance there is an injury, we deal with it at the time. The problem is we don't create chances, that's not being addressed by signing backup to replace other dross backup we signed.
cwfka
by melonhead » 31 Jan 2012 11:59
VisionFiNeRaInchilipepper91 http://www.readingfc.co.uk/page/NewsDetail/0,,10306~2594892,00.html
Looks like that could be it for today...
Not impressed if true. Not particularly motivated to go and watch this current bunch with the one dimensional players lacking creativity on show. Yeah, im negative bla bla bla. But its absolute dross every week at the moment and a young unproven centre mid who derby were happy to let go on a free is not going to change the rhythm for our games, especially when on the bench. Connolly is a good backup signing, he may also play left back but thats not where we are struggling. Our back five is the most solid aspect about out team - the biggest weakness is the midfield by far and the one addition we've added there is NOWHERE near enough im afraid. Happy with roberts signings but lets be honest..he's not going to creative his own through balls and nod in his own crosses from the wing, why can't the management see the obvious weakness and one dimensional play of our midfield? Its really, really worrying.
One thing about Connolly is that his distribution from the back is very good whenever I've seen him. Which is in stark contrast to the current defenders. It won't necessarily solve the creative problem in centre midfield but will certainly help to have better distribution from deep. And lets be honest neither Sidwell/Harper/Gunnarsson were particularly creative passers in 05/06. Cywka also gives us something the option of changing formation as well.
As I said before I really don't know what you were expecting to get given that the Russian takeover hasn't happened yet.
by tomrfcurz » 31 Jan 2012 12:00
by FiNeRaIn » 31 Jan 2012 12:00
tomrfcurz Cywka is a good signing but if that is the only attacking minded midfield signing then i can't help but be a tad disappointed. Yes Roberts is a good signing, perhaps the best thus far, followed by Connolly who you just have to look at his QPR starts at his age (104 i believe) and at the level that was at (mainly in a very strong Championship side) you cannot grumble. I think he'll go at LB as i can't see him wanting to join too much if it was purely as cover.
We need another attacking minded player, simple as. And i will be disappointed if we don't have one by 11pm tonight. I know that reeks of a spoilt child using mummy and daddys money to excess but its the truth
by melonhead » 31 Jan 2012 12:01
FiNeRaInmelonheadFiNeRaIn If it meant we might actually have someone who created chances for our strikers? absofvkinglutely. On the off chance there is an injury, we deal with it at the time. The problem is we don't create chances, that's not being addressed by signing backup to replace other dross backup we signed.
cwfka
Sorry but no. He was released by derby, spent 10 mins on the wing and is not proven. Can you please stop repeating him like you think its valid?
We need a regular starter next to karacan who is going to create now, not someone for the future.
Users browsing this forum: bcubed, bracknell_royal15, Clyde1998, Google Adsense [Bot], Keysfield, Royals and Racers and 170 guests