by melonhead » 01 Mar 2012 14:36
by Barry the bird boggler » 01 Mar 2012 14:41
by Top Flight » 01 Mar 2012 14:57
by Mike Hunt » 01 Mar 2012 15:06
by Mr Angry » 01 Mar 2012 15:10
Top Flight I don't want Pompey to fold. It would be bad for football if they went out of business. Pompey is a great club at the end of the day with heritage and traditions. It would be very very sad if they had to leave the football league.
We don't need them to fold for us to climb above the Hammers. I think we will get above them anyway come what may without the need for Pompey to have to go out of business.
by who are ya? » 01 Mar 2012 15:15
by andrew1957 » 01 Mar 2012 15:21
by rfc2001 » 01 Mar 2012 15:34
by CentiaRoyal » 01 Mar 2012 16:34
by mr_number » 01 Mar 2012 16:40
by pea » 01 Mar 2012 16:50
mr_number Obviously the points are nice, but the real issue is they've been cheating.
Someone needs to go out of business to show that you can't run football clubs like that, otherwise the vicious cycle of clubs spending beyond their means continues. This is the kind of thing that proves the SJM way.
Of course you can feel sorry for their fans, since it wasn't their decision to spend money they didn't have.
by Deadlock » 01 Mar 2012 16:53
rfc2001 Nobody want's a club to fold
by Badger Finger » 01 Mar 2012 17:22
by Franchise FC » 01 Mar 2012 17:24
Badger Finger I will happily walk round the ground collecting 4 pence off people to give to help Portsmouth...
by facaldaqui » 01 Mar 2012 17:25
Mr AngryTop Flight I don't want Pompey to fold. It would be bad for football if they went out of business. Pompey is a great club at the end of the day with heritage and traditions. It would be very very sad if they had to leave the football league.
We don't need them to fold for us to climb above the Hammers. I think we will get above them anyway come what may without the need for Pompey to have to go out of business.
Rubbish.
They have basically been cheating every other team - including us - for Years, by paying salaries to players they couldn't afford.
One small example; a couple of seasons ago, Brendan wanted to buy Tommy Smith from Watford. The 2 clubs agreed a fee, and we agreed personal terms with the player. At the last minute, Pompey came in and offered him 3 times the salary, so he went there.
Consequence? We didn't get the striker that could have scored the goals that meant we wouldn't have been in the relegation dogfight so Brendan wouldn't have lost his job, gone to Swansea and taken them up (instead, possibly, taking US up). Smith is of course, scoring for QPR in the Prem now.
So absolutely NO sympathy for Pompey.
by Franchise FC » 01 Mar 2012 17:26
facaldaqui And it turned out Watford were one of the clubs they owed money to in the last administration--so they never paid up. Some nobbers criticised our people at the time of the Smith transfer; but in fact we were the only one of the three parties that didn't negotiate like wide boys, and the only one with actual money.
by facaldaqui » 01 Mar 2012 17:31
Franchise FCfacaldaqui And it turned out Watford were one of the clubs they owed money to in the last administration--so they never paid up. Some nobbers criticised our people at the time of the Smith transfer; but in fact we were the only one of the three parties that didn't negotiate like wide boys, and the only one with actual money.
Don't Watford count as a preferred creditor on the football creditor rule ?
by facaldaqui » 01 Mar 2012 17:49
by Ian Royal » 01 Mar 2012 17:56
Badger Finger I will happily walk round the ground collecting 4 pence off people to give to help Portsmouth...
by JR » 01 Mar 2012 17:58
Users browsing this forum: windermereROYAL and 63 guests