Archie's penalty http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=rLU-kgKbZeU
I can't make that work
by JC » 02 Apr 2012 09:31
Archie's penalty http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=rLU-kgKbZeU
by Big Foot » 02 Apr 2012 12:13
by Spirit of Elm Park » 02 Apr 2012 12:18
RoyalBluetomrfcurznamroyal Just in case anyone was in any doubt as to whether Hunt was onside.... here's the proof:
Thing is, his front foot is blocked in this picture and if that's past the last defender (which it looks like it could be) then it's offside as its a part of his body that can play the ball. Admittedly its difficult and its easier to go by the main body of the player
All these pictures prove absolutely nothing either way. Unless you/the camera are stood looking over the shoulder of the asst ref (linesman) and, assuming he is in line with the 2nd defender, then you can't really judge whether a player is offside or not.
Watching it 'live' on tv muy immediate reaction was to laugh because I thought we had got the benefit of a really dodgy decision. Having then watched the replays, my feeling is that Hunt wasn't offside but once again the camera wasn't in line with the lino and 2nd defender so couldn't state so conclusively.
by Big Foot » 02 Apr 2012 12:26
by floyd__streete » 02 Apr 2012 12:30
by Snowball » 02 Apr 2012 12:31
floyd__streete Just back from the game.
It was quite good.
by SLAMMED » 02 Apr 2012 12:34
by manny96 » 02 Apr 2012 12:46
by Spirit of Elm Park » 02 Apr 2012 12:49
Big Foot A friend of mine reckons he had the 2-4 100/1 bet as well!
by Ian Royal » 02 Apr 2012 17:25
Spirit of Elm ParkBig Foot A friend of mine reckons he had the 2-4 100/1 bet as well!
It existed.
He took some pelters from me before hand, but more than happy to take it back after the game, his text read "Yes,Yes,Yes...can't stop shaking"
Shame he only went with a £1 stake.
by Tails » 02 Apr 2012 17:33
manny96 Oh and anyone know what happened to the lady who took a tumble on the way out towards the station? Possibly tripped on the curb and seemed to have hurt her shoulder quite badly. Looked like she was in capable hands when I walked past.
by Man Friday » 02 Apr 2012 17:41
RoyalBlue All these pictures prove absolutely nothing either way. Unless you/the camera are stood looking over the shoulder of the asst ref (linesman) and, assuming he is in line with the 2nd defender, then you can't really judge whether a player is offside or not.
Watching it 'live' on tv my immediate reaction was to laugh because I thought we had got the benefit of a really dodgy decision. Having then watched the replays, my feeling is that Hunt wasn't offside but once again the camera wasn't in line with the lino and 2nd defender so couldn't state so conclusively.
by Shackleton Royal » 02 Apr 2012 18:06
manny96 Oh and anyone know what happened to the lady who took a tumble on the way out towards the station? Possibly tripped on the curb and seemed to have hurt her shoulder quite badly. Looked like she was in capable hands when I walked past.
by Ian Royal » 02 Apr 2012 18:10
Man FridayRoyalBlue All these pictures prove absolutely nothing either way. Unless you/the camera are stood looking over the shoulder of the asst ref (linesman) and, assuming he is in line with the 2nd defender, then you can't really judge whether a player is offside or not.
Watching it 'live' on tv my immediate reaction was to laugh because I thought we had got the benefit of a really dodgy decision. Having then watched the replays, my feeling is that Hunt wasn't offside but once again the camera wasn't in line with the lino and 2nd defender so couldn't state so conclusively.
Can't agree with you there. Friday's Legacy's photo is as conclusive as the family laughing together at the end of a 1980's American TV 'comedy' show.
by RoyalBlue » 02 Apr 2012 18:27
Ian RoyalMan FridayRoyalBlue All these pictures prove absolutely nothing either way. Unless you/the camera are stood looking over the shoulder of the asst ref (linesman) and, assuming he is in line with the 2nd defender, then you can't really judge whether a player is offside or not.
Watching it 'live' on tv my immediate reaction was to laugh because I thought we had got the benefit of a really dodgy decision. Having then watched the replays, my feeling is that Hunt wasn't offside but once again the camera wasn't in line with the lino and 2nd defender so couldn't state so conclusively.
Can't agree with you there. Friday's Legacy's photo is as conclusive as the family laughing together at the end of a 1980's American TV 'comedy' show.
Agreed. The two photos combined are about as conclusive as you can possibly get short of a photo of a trio of West Ham defenders sitting on the goal line.
by Ian Royal » 02 Apr 2012 18:59
by TFF » 02 Apr 2012 19:02
Ian Royal making yourself look stupid. Those photos are utterly conclusive.
by paultheroyal » 02 Apr 2012 19:06
manny96 Oh and anyone know what happened to the lady who took a tumble on the way out towards the station? Possibly tripped on the curb and seemed to have hurt her shoulder quite badly. Looked like she was in capable hands when I walked past.
by Maquisard » 02 Apr 2012 19:21
Ian RoyalSpirit of Elm ParkBig Foot A friend of mine reckons he had the 2-4 100/1 bet as well!
It existed.
He took some pelters from me before hand, but more than happy to take it back after the game, his text read "Yes,Yes,Yes...can't stop shaking"
Shame he only went with a £1 stake.
Maquisard places that bet for every game and then forget for West Ham.
Didn't that happen last time we won 4-2 as well Maq?
by Man Friday » 02 Apr 2012 19:26
Ian Royal making yourself look stupid. Those photos are utterly conclusive. It would be stupid to criticise the lino if he got it wrong given he doesn't have the benefit of freeze frames, slow mo and repeat viewings. Doesn't mean he wouldn't have been wrong for giving offside if he had.
Users browsing this forum: One Beer is never enough., Royal Ginger, Snowflake Royal and 248 guests