by FiNeRaIn » 15 Apr 2012 20:06
by Friday's Legacy » 15 Apr 2012 20:23
by FiNeRaIn » 15 Apr 2012 20:26
by Friday's Legacy » 15 Apr 2012 20:33
FiNeRaIn You clearly didn't check the link...its a joke.
by FiNeRaIn » 15 Apr 2012 20:34
Friday's LegacyFiNeRaIn You clearly didn't check the link...its a joke.
Your post was bad enough was bad enough in all honesty.
by Friday's Legacy » 15 Apr 2012 20:37
FiNeRaInFriday's LegacyFiNeRaIn You clearly didn't check the link...its a joke.
Your post was bad enough was bad enough in all honesty.
Stop posting gibberish, clown.
by Friday's Legacy » 15 Apr 2012 20:45
No Fixed Abode There were a few fans either end of the ground making noise. Good to see Chelsea come out quickly and condem these fans.
Friday's LegacyNo Fixed Abode There were a few fans either end of the ground making noise. Good to see Chelsea come out quickly and condem these fans.
The only noise that came from Tottenham's end was in reaction to Chelsea, and just as they reacted, the silence ended (I felt a little early, I'm not sure). Chelsea were in the wrong, not Spurs. That's a ridiculous claim. Chelsea have apologised - but they had too! As they had to for the racist Chelsea fans on the trains, and the racist chanting towards Anton Ferdinand, oh and for their racist Captain. It's been a hell of a year for Chelsea.
by LWJ » 15 Apr 2012 20:58
Jerry St ClairSchards#2 Kes does have a point here.
As someone who was going to lots of football at this time, it would be extremely unusual for a high profile game like this to be free from a fair few drunk fans, many more who whilst not drunk had had a few drinks before the match, fans who turned up late, fans who turned up without a ticket.
That was just how it was in that era. That's not to say that all of that amounts to Liverpool fans being to blame, but to suggest that none of the above was happening at this game is not really credible.
There is a huge amount of evidence that drunkenness was not a contributory factor to the disaster. That makes the point about there being "a fair few drunk fans" at the game irrelevant.
Fans did not turn up late by any definition. In fact, you could argue they turned up early. The tickets for this game advised fans to arrive 15 minutes before kick off. 15 minutes. The central pens at the Leppings Lane end were full to capacity by 2.10. The crush outside the ground started at around 1.50 and was critical by 2.20. Most of the people in the crush had arrived in Leppings Lane around 1.30. Who here things turning up at a ground an hour and half before kick off constitutes "late"?
Taylor found no evidence that ticketless fans were to blame. Indeed the Leppings Lane terrace, as a whole, was probably just under capacity, suggesting that only ticket holders gained entrance. Again, that makes there ticketless fans argument irrelevant.
by Friday's Legacy » 15 Apr 2012 21:05
lowerwestjnrJerry St ClairSchards#2 Kes does have a point here.
As someone who was going to lots of football at this time, it would be extremely unusual for a high profile game like this to be free from a fair few drunk fans, many more who whilst not drunk had had a few drinks before the match, fans who turned up late, fans who turned up without a ticket.
That was just how it was in that era. That's not to say that all of that amounts to Liverpool fans being to blame, but to suggest that none of the above was happening at this game is not really credible.
There is a huge amount of evidence that drunkenness was not a contributory factor to the disaster. That makes the point about there being "a fair few drunk fans" at the game irrelevant.
Fans did not turn up late by any definition. In fact, you could argue they turned up early. The tickets for this game advised fans to arrive 15 minutes before kick off. 15 minutes. The central pens at the Leppings Lane end were full to capacity by 2.10. The crush outside the ground started at around 1.50 and was critical by 2.20. Most of the people in the crush had arrived in Leppings Lane around 1.30. Who here things turning up at a ground an hour and half before kick off constitutes "late"?
Taylor found no evidence that ticketless fans were to blame. Indeed the Leppings Lane terrace, as a whole, was probably just under capacity, suggesting that only ticket holders gained entrance. Again, that makes there ticketless fans argument irrelevant.
Er the police failed because they opened the gates, but only because there was a crush outside, and the Liverpool fans (some drunk, some not, some without tickets some with) piled in. Then pushed into one pen even though it was full. When you are waiting for a tube, and the carriage gets full so you can't get through the door, do you pile in, or find another carriage?
by Friday's Legacy » 15 Apr 2012 21:18
TheMaraudingDog Could the fans not direct themselves then?
Lemmings in the Leppings.
by postwhisperer » 15 Apr 2012 21:23
by Friday's Legacy » 15 Apr 2012 21:29
postwhisperer quoting the taylor report doesnt really help an argument. load of bollox written to appease scousers frothing at the mouth for blood
by AthleticoSpizz » 15 Apr 2012 21:39
by postwhisperer » 15 Apr 2012 22:01
Friday's Legacypostwhisperer quoting the taylor report doesnt really help an argument. load of bollox written to appease scousers frothing at the mouth for blood
I'm sure neither you or the wum can be bothered, but if you took the time to watch/listen to the witness accounts of the events of that day you will see that that is an accurate statement of events.
by who are ya? » 15 Apr 2012 22:24
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 80 guests