by BR2 »
26 Apr 2012 12:32
TBM ZacNaloen And if Chelsea had done that they'd have lost massively. It's just not in their interests.
There we go....
Chelsea weren't playing for "the neutrals" - they were playing for themselves and point me in the direction of one Chelsea fan who didn't enjoy it
Of course Chelsea fans enjoyed the result even if they felt embarrassed (as some of them did in the first leg at The Bridge)by the way their team played especially bearing in mind the stick they have given to spoilers such as Stoke and the old Arsenal about the way they play the game.
This is a "neutral" topic and discussion board (apart from Kes) so most of us don't give a toss about Chelsea fans although in my case I have to confess to having a Chelsea season-ticket holder as a son (Kerry Dixon,why did you ever leave us,you have a lot to answer for)who tells me that the natives this season and last have been far from happy with the football that they see week-in,week-out.
Liverpool have even beaten them every time over the past 2 seasons FFS with or without Fernando.