by Snowball » 07 May 2012 18:02
by Snowball » 07 May 2012 19:10
by SydenhamRoyal » 08 May 2012 16:54
SnowballSydenhamRoyal
Ahem. 86 was 3rd. If a team had got 77, they would have been 4th. If the team who came 4th had got 85 - they would still have been 4th.
by Snowball » 08 May 2012 17:34
SydenhamRoyalSnowballSydenhamRoyal
Ahem. 86 was 3rd. If a team had got 77, they would have been 4th. If the team who came 4th had got 85 - they would still have been 4th.
Understand where you are coming from, Syd.
I think its just you that does. Not quite sure how I feel about that
by Platypuss » 08 May 2012 18:38
by SydenhamRoyal » 08 May 2012 20:34
Platypuss If you are running a race and overtake the person in 4th, that doesn't then make you 3rd.
by Extended-Phenotype » 09 May 2012 08:59
by Wimb » 09 May 2012 10:37
Extended-Phenotype Popped into the Snowball dungeon to say hello to the inmate and ask Statto a riddle that interests me…
In your close examination of games, can you tell me how many points that one could say Harte ‘lost’ Reading this season, and how many points you could argue Harte ‘won’?
I.e. a costly mistake leading to a goal in which Reading lost or drew the game VS a goal Harte scored or setup that lead to Reading winning or drawing.
I just thought it would be interesting to appreciate in ballpark terms whether we gain more from Harte’s skill than we lose from his pace.
My pre-conceived notion is we gain more than we lose.
by Snowball » 09 May 2012 10:42
Extended-Phenotype
In your close examination of games, can you tell me how many points that one could say Harte ‘lost’ Reading this season, and how many points you could argue Harte ‘won’?
I.e. a costly mistake leading to a goal in which Reading lost or drew the game VS a goal Harte scored or setup that lead to Reading winning or drawing.
I just thought it would be interesting to appreciate in ballpark terms whether we gain more from Harte’s skill than we lose from his pace.
My pre-conceived notion is we gain more than we lose.
by Snowball » 09 May 2012 10:42
WimbExtended-Phenotype Popped into the Snowball dungeon to say hello to the inmate and ask Statto a riddle that interests me…
In your close examination of games, can you tell me how many points that one could say Harte ‘lost’ Reading this season, and how many points you could argue Harte ‘won’?
I.e. a costly mistake leading to a goal in which Reading lost or drew the game VS a goal Harte scored or setup that lead to Reading winning or drawing.
I just thought it would be interesting to appreciate in ballpark terms whether we gain more from Harte’s skill than we lose from his pace.
My pre-conceived notion is we gain more than we lose.
I can't remember too many Harte 'errors' the only ones that come to mind are failing to close down the guy at Hull and also being hilariously outpaced at Peterborough.
by Snowball » 09 May 2012 10:59
by Snowball » 09 May 2012 11:10
by Snowball » 09 May 2012 11:16
by Snowball » 09 May 2012 11:21
by Wimb » 09 May 2012 13:31
SnowballWimbExtended-Phenotype Popped into the Snowball dungeon to say hello to the inmate and ask Statto a riddle that interests me…
In your close examination of games, can you tell me how many points that one could say Harte ‘lost’ Reading this season, and how many points you could argue Harte ‘won’?
I.e. a costly mistake leading to a goal in which Reading lost or drew the game VS a goal Harte scored or setup that lead to Reading winning or drawing.
I just thought it would be interesting to appreciate in ballpark terms whether we gain more from Harte’s skill than we lose from his pace.
My pre-conceived notion is we gain more than we lose.
I can't remember too many Harte 'errors' the only ones that come to mind are failing to close down the guy at Hull and also being hilariously outpaced at Peterborough.
We let in a lot more goals when he plays
by winchester_royal » 09 May 2012 13:34
Snowball I was frankly taken aback by the poor stats for Harte
and thought I'd look at how we fared once the side was settle
(ie after Gorks came in and Khumalo was dropped)
Defensively, when Harte plays we concede a lot more goals per game
and get a lower percentage of clean sheets, but (including the Roberts games)
we seem to get a lot more points.
Personally I suspect it's Roberts coming in that skews the stats in Harte's favour.
Left Back Stats Excluding Games 1-6
Left Back - Defensively
P01 W01 D00 L00 01-00 0.00 Goals per Game 100% Clean Sheets Cummings
P03 W03 D00 L00 05-00 0.00 Goals per Game 100% Clean Sheets Griffin
P11 W04 D05 L02 12-09 0.82 Goals per Game 045% Clean Sheets Mills
P25 W18 D02 L05 48-25 1.00 Goals per Game 040% Clean Sheets Harte
P15 W08 D05 L02 18-09 0.60 Goals per Game 060% Clean Sheets Cummings+Griffin+Mills Combined
P25 W18 D03 L08 48-25 1.00 Goals per Game 040% Clean Sheets Harte
Left Back Offensively
03 Points from 01 Games, 01-00 = 3.00 ppg Cummings
09 Points from 03 Games, 05-00 = 3.00 ppg Griffin
17 Points from 11 Games, 12-11 = 1.55 ppg Mills
57 Points from 25 Games, 48-25 = 2.28 ppg Harte
29 Points from 15 Games, 18-11 = 1.93 ppg Cummings+Griffin+Mills Combined
57 Points from 25 Games, 48-25 = 2.28 ppg Harte
by Extended-Phenotype » 09 May 2012 13:47
by Barry the bird boggler » 09 May 2012 14:33
by cmonurz » 09 May 2012 15:14
Barry the bird boggler Out of interest what is out points per game ratio when a) it rains for most of the game, b) it's not raining, c) it rains for a while before the game
by Ian Royal » 09 May 2012 15:55
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 174 guests