by Royal Lady » 14 May 2012 17:36
by ZacNaloen » 14 May 2012 17:38
by Cobi » 14 May 2012 17:44
ZacNaloen Cobi; I believe his comments in the "uncovered" tweet are referring to when someone made a very unfunny joke about that telegraph smear piece with zero quotes, full of innuendo and implying that being acquitted of any wrong doing means you did something wrong, maybe being a bitter West Ham supporter.
He of course wasn't, but it was a joke. Or at least I read it as one.
by Chaney » 14 May 2012 17:45
by ZacNaloen » 14 May 2012 17:50
by Simon's Church » 14 May 2012 17:53
Cobi But he plans a new blog on TSI, which judging by his previous is full on negativity.
by PieEater » 14 May 2012 18:02
andrew1957PieEaterLoyal Royal Royal the delay could give both parties a convenient way of backing out gracefully.
I'm not sure there's any way SJM could come out of this well after all the swooning his done over TSI. "Match made in heaven" etc. If it turns out Anton hasn't got enough money then he looks like a right old fool.
Much better to admit to being fooled than to allow the takeover to happen and for us to end up like Pompey. In any case I think all true fans should think even more highly of Sir John's tenure if he had the guts to walk away from a bad deal. Only a real fool would carry on with the sale just to save face.
As I have said before we have a lot to thank TSI for whatever happens as without them we probably would not be in the PL.
So if TSI turn out to be the real deal and the sale goes ahead and they have money - then great and if not we carry on as before, but with more confidence this time as parachute payments are both larger and last for longer.
by Forbury Lion » 14 May 2012 18:13
winchester_royalForbury LionI bet Portsmouth fans wish they'd had a SJM.winchester_royal
Yes, because a SJM DOESN'T take £25m out of a club and hence doom them to inevitable relegation.
That wouldn't be having the club's best interests at heart, that would be having his own personal interests and destroying a fantastic opportunity to build the club.
by winchester_royal » 14 May 2012 18:34
by SpaceCruiser » 14 May 2012 18:59
Terminal BoardomHoneyRoastHoax Its all fine but they are having to count his money and its all in 1ps. Thats why its taking so long
You would think that there would be an automatic coin sorter somewhere.
This is my favourite all time thread. Loads of keyboard warriors getting their rocks off by posting shitloads of utter drivel. So much entertainment that I can hardly contain myself.
by Pat Butchers Ring » 14 May 2012 19:12
by Cobi » 14 May 2012 19:24
Pat Butchers Ring It is on Jon Keens agenda to increase STAR's shareholding and eventually become a major shareholder. With these empire building plans no wonder he puts a negative spin on anything relating to TSI.
by TommyF » 14 May 2012 21:29
by Ian Royal » 14 May 2012 22:13
tlcsIan RoyalLoyal Royal Royal i know his sounds dodgy and unreliable but mate of mine viewed a house at the weekend and got talking to the owner about RFC.
the guy was a " close personal friend " of SJM and he reckons take over is definitely off and SJM not concerned as we in prem.
reliable or not the delay could give both parties a convenient way of backing out gracefully.
My mum's mates with Cilla Black and she says there's no problems at all and it'll be completed on Thursday.
And she coldnt get you a ticket for the Birmingham game !!!
by Libertine » 15 May 2012 00:06
TommyF We have a UAE billionaire who lives round the corner from me in Flackwell Heath called Khalaf Al Habtoor.
Please, Khalaf, buy us and put your construction business on our shirts (and get your guys to build a bigger stadium).
By all accounts, very well regarded locally and sponsors a young persons award each year in the local community.
TSI just feels like it's off. Shame if it is but maybe we can get a real billionaire now WE ARE PREMIER LEAGUE!
ZacNaloen And i'm sure it will have as much substance as ever.
He can't be specific with his grievances because that opens him up to legal recourse.
TSI want a certain amount of secrecy, but they have willingly given us more and more information over the last few weeks.
So all we can do is wait for the Premier league to make their minds up, and having read the document Royal Lady posted a few pages back, I don't think that will happen until we are officially inaugurated into the premier league which hasn't happened yet, so technically we aren't their responsibility. We are in club limbo as there is no point in the FL signing anything off anyway, as the premier league have different rules.
by Stranded » 15 May 2012 05:51
by Dare to Dr£am » 15 May 2012 08:25
by West Stand Man » 15 May 2012 08:36
by Geekins » 15 May 2012 08:44
by Uke » 15 May 2012 08:46
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 149 guests