Thames Sports Investment

5145 posts
Chaney
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 1979
Joined: 11 May 2004 18:59

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by Chaney » 15 May 2012 16:31

andrew1957 It is all ok the deal is going through next week according to BBC Sport.

Unfortunately just like tomorrow next week just never seems to come.


link please

Cypry
Member
Posts: 995
Joined: 17 Sep 2009 13:32

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by Cypry » 15 May 2012 16:32

Chaney
andrew1957 It is all ok the deal is going through next week according to BBC Sport.

Unfortunately just like tomorrow next week just never seems to come.


link please


http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/18073244

Chaney
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 1979
Joined: 11 May 2004 18:59

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by Chaney » 15 May 2012 16:40

andrew1957 It is all ok the deal is going through next week according to BBC Sport.

Unfortunately just like tomorrow next week just never seems to come.


That quote was made on April 20th

Cypry
Member
Posts: 995
Joined: 17 Sep 2009 13:32

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by Cypry » 15 May 2012 16:47

The link I posted is from today - seems to imply that it's a delay with the PL, and they're not in a hurry to get the situation resolved........

On the plus side, there's nothing to indicate that they think it's a problem at our end (i.e. SJM and TSI falling out).....

I reckon it's just a case of the PL having other things to worry about and dragging their feet.....

Start

SJM "Are you going to get this sorted soon?"

PL Representative "Yes Sir John - next week hopefully"


......a week passes........

SJM "Still no news?"

PL Representative "No - we're working on it but something came up".......

Goto Start

User avatar
Cobi
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1112
Joined: 31 Mar 2011 00:31

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by Cobi » 15 May 2012 17:01

Reading takeover by Anton Zingarevich an 'ongoing process'

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/1 ... witterfeed

Initially only the Football League needed to approve the deal but following April's promotion, the Premier League have now also had to ratify the proposed takeover, meaning a second set of tests.
Those 'fit and proper persons' tests involve an 'owners and directors' check which includes a face-to-face meeting between the Premier League, Zingarevich and all representatives of TSI.
The test also requires Zingarevich and TSI to provide proof of current and future funds as well as budgets and a business plan.
TSI is not a company or limited-liability partnership incorporated in the UK, making inquiries less straightforward.

Nuffin we didnt already know.

COME ON I'M GETTING IMPATIENT. :twisted: :roll:
Last edited by Cobi on 15 May 2012 17:05, edited 1 time in total.


themadstad
Member
Posts: 411
Joined: 16 Mar 2009 00:18

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by themadstad » 15 May 2012 17:28

Still no news, now the club seem to be quiet on TSI too. Where before they mentioned TSI in some capacity or another.

It would make sense that checks are complex due to TSI being incorporated outside the UK and the various investors wanting a certain amount of privacy.

The main bankers will have their own procedures for principal controllers over a business, that wouldn't affect the outcome, but shows the complexity.

Rumours that there isn't money, does Anton actually have the money reported. Why does Chris Samuelson say Boris is there should Anton need it? Why so much secrecy over the investors? In addition since the investors have been revealing themselves and Boris's involvement has become apparent it goes on and on. Previous attempt with Everton failed, reason unknown. Plenty of questions are popping up from our point of view. No wonder it's taking so long. Yet a while back everyone [club] seemed confident.
Last edited by themadstad on 15 May 2012 17:31, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
RepressedRoyal
Member
Posts: 230
Joined: 21 Aug 2011 10:48
Location: Basingstoke

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by RepressedRoyal » 15 May 2012 17:28

F*ck me, Jonny Fordham has defected from GetReading and joined BBC Sports as a national "no news" correspondent.

User avatar
Cobi
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1112
Joined: 31 Mar 2011 00:31

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by Cobi » 15 May 2012 17:31

themadstad

Rumours that there isn't money, does Anton actually have the money reported. Why does Chris Samuelson say Boris is there should Anton need it? Why so much secrecy over the investors? Plenty of questions are popping up from our point of view. No wonder it's taking so long. Yet a while back everyone [club] seemed confident.


there's a rumour going around you haven't read the last few pages of this thread, otherwise you'd know who the money is now.

madstadblues
Member
Posts: 255
Joined: 09 Jun 2004 14:57
Location: Northbound on the Fallopian Tube

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by madstadblues » 15 May 2012 17:34

In fairness to the Premier League this is probably their busiest time with 3 teams being promoted and relegated. The FA awards don't happen by themselves and someone had to interview Neville and Hodgson. Apparently the Joey Barton incidents take priority and the extended bank holiday is causing chaos .


themadstad
Member
Posts: 411
Joined: 16 Mar 2009 00:18

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by themadstad » 15 May 2012 17:37

Cobi
themadstad

Rumours that there isn't money, does Anton actually have the money reported. Why does Chris Samuelson say Boris is there should Anton need it? Why so much secrecy over the investors? Plenty of questions are popping up from our point of view. No wonder it's taking so long. Yet a while back everyone [club] seemed confident.


there's a rumour going around you haven't read the last few pages of this thread, otherwise you'd know who the money is now.


What the bit where Chris says BZ is there if Anton needs it? So why wasn't this mentioned from the very start? Which I referred to. Or the additional investor of Obolensky which I didn't mention but nothing suggest he's worth anything significant enough.

themadstad
Member
Posts: 411
Joined: 16 Mar 2009 00:18

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by themadstad » 15 May 2012 17:56

Well certainly if Boris is worth the reported billions alone then we're better off already. Not that it'll all be spent but it's wealth of a principle investor that can help us when required. God knows what the amount is the premier league will be looking to confirm. I expect it'll be in form of a business plan for a period of time and then the required funds for that plan to back it up etc.

Then maybe each investor needs do declare wealth and prove it.

User avatar
blueroyals
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2172
Joined: 02 Sep 2010 02:11

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by blueroyals » 15 May 2012 18:11

Cobi Who nose mate. i'm sure if it goes belly up they'll be other interested parties. greater 'chute payments mean more stability too. Gr8 if it goes through but not fussed if it dont. as you say, they wont splash silly money, so im more than happy with the devil we know .


How old is SJM now? Got to be in his 70s - if it's taken him 20 years to find a buyer that meets his criteria and this takeover goes balls-up, how long will it take him to find another? I hate to admit it but I think he'll be as desperate as anybody for this deal to go through purely because he doesn't have another 20 years to find an investor that is genuinely interested in the club (what would you rather - he sells up to Anton who has at least demonstrated he has a real interest in both football and the club, or SJM having to sell up to a Venky's a few years down the line due to health reasons god forbid).

madstadblues
Member
Posts: 255
Joined: 09 Jun 2004 14:57
Location: Northbound on the Fallopian Tube

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by madstadblues » 15 May 2012 18:14

How does the Premier League fair play rules effect this. If you are only able to spend a proportion of your revenue and your debts need to be limited does it matter how much money any prospective owner does or doesn't have ? :|


User avatar
robinsfriday
Member
Posts: 492
Joined: 22 Sep 2004 00:39

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by robinsfriday » 15 May 2012 18:26

blueroyals
Cobi Who nose mate. i'm sure if it goes belly up they'll be other interested parties. greater 'chute payments mean more stability too. Gr8 if it goes through but not fussed if it dont. as you say, they wont splash silly money, so im more than happy with the devil we know .


How old is SJM now? Got to be in his 70s - if it's taken him 20 years to find a buyer that meets his criteria and this takeover goes balls-up, how long will it take him to find another? I hate to admit it but I think he'll be as desperate as anybody for this deal to go through purely because he doesn't have another 20 years to find an investor that is genuinely interested in the club (what would you rather - he sells up to Anton who has at least demonstrated he has a real interest in both football and the club, or SJM having to sell up to a Venky's a few years down the line due to health reasons god forbid).


I don't think he has been looking for a buyer for twenty years. Most likely he has been actively looking for the past 3-5 years. You have to remember that as a Premiership team we are more likely to get an interested party wanting to purchase a 51% share.

If the TSI deal falls short then I would expect interested parties to come forward, but most likely if we stay up. But as always in this situation (takeover) it just takes time and I think the PL will be far more astute with their research into the potential buyers based on the activities that have occurred at Portsmouth to name but a few.

User avatar
blueroyals
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2172
Joined: 02 Sep 2010 02:11

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by blueroyals » 15 May 2012 18:55

robinsfriday
blueroyals
Cobi Who nose mate. i'm sure if it goes belly up they'll be other interested parties. greater 'chute payments mean more stability too. Gr8 if it goes through but not fussed if it dont. as you say, they wont splash silly money, so im more than happy with the devil we know .


How old is SJM now? Got to be in his 70s - if it's taken him 20 years to find a buyer that meets his criteria and this takeover goes balls-up, how long will it take him to find another? I hate to admit it but I think he'll be as desperate as anybody for this deal to go through purely because he doesn't have another 20 years to find an investor that is genuinely interested in the club (what would you rather - he sells up to Anton who has at least demonstrated he has a real interest in both football and the club, or SJM having to sell up to a Venky's a few years down the line due to health reasons god forbid).


I don't think he has been looking for a buyer for twenty years. Most likely he has been actively looking for the past 3-5 years. You have to remember that as a Premiership team we are more likely to get an interested party wanting to purchase a 51% share.

If the TSI deal falls short then I would expect interested parties to come forward, but most likely if we stay up. But as always in this situation (takeover) it just takes time and I think the PL will be far more astute with their research into the potential buyers based on the activities that have occurred at Portsmouth to name but a few.


True but I think if a group like TSI approached him at any point during his ownership of Reading he would have accepted the offer. I think he said a few years back that he had been approached by a few consortiums but they didn't take his fancy.

Just looked at Sir John's wiki page, apparently the club was valued at £100m back in 2007. You can only assume the club is worth more money than that now - to be selling a controlling stake in the club for just £13m speaks volumes about how desperate he is to sell.

User avatar
PieEater
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 6542
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 15:42
Location: Comfortably numb

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by PieEater » 15 May 2012 19:41

madstadblues How does the Premier League fair play rules effect this. If you are only able to spend a proportion of your revenue and your debts need to be limited does it matter how much money any prospective owner does or doesn't have ? :|


You'd think not, FFP means that clubs need to break even. But that excludes any investment in the stadium or academy, so you'd think the way to grow the club is to expand the stadium, keep selling academy grown talent and expand commercial revenue. So cash will be need for investment, but not to bankroll the clubs wage bill. But certainly not at the level it used to be required.

Additionally the FFP only applies to European games, you can still run at a loss if you don't intend on playing in Europe, although if you make it your revenue can increase 30-40%

Cypry
Member
Posts: 995
Joined: 17 Sep 2009 13:32

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by Cypry » 15 May 2012 20:00

blueroyals apparently the club was valued at £100m back in 2007. You can only assume the club is worth more money than that now - to be selling a controlling stake in the club for just £13m speaks volumes about how desperate he is to sell.


What utter rubbish!!!

You're talking about a valuation from last time we were in the PL, and probably an over-valuation at that....

TSI agreed the deal when we were a Championship club, and the deal involves £25M cash (for 100% of the club). SJM currently has £28M in outstanding chairmans loans as well, which if they remain with the club (and I am sure they will), values the club (as a Championship side) at somewhat over £50M......

chilipepper91
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2158
Joined: 03 Mar 2005 20:30

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by chilipepper91 » 15 May 2012 21:51

IIRC it was Madejski who valued the club at £80m, or at least said he would sell it for that amount

User avatar
Pseud O'Nym
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1712
Joined: 24 Jan 2008 01:06
Location: An elephant is not a large bacterium.

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by Pseud O'Nym » 15 May 2012 23:45

The only time I've seen an "official" valuation - by which I mean one that the club didn't deny - was early 2008. The FT website reported that SJM was employing Citigroup to find a buyer and that Deloitte and Touche were valuing it at 80 to 100 million. The FT article seems to have disappeared, however here is a link to a rehash from the site of a US publication: http://www.sportsbusinessdaily.com/Journal/Issues/2008/03/20080310/This-Weeks-News/Citigroup-Hired-To-Sell-Premier-League-Team.aspx

User avatar
Royal Rother
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 21810
Joined: 13 Apr 2004 23:22
Location: The handsome bald fella with the blue eyes

Re: Thames Sports Investment

by Royal Rother » 16 May 2012 08:23

Cypry SJM currently has £28M in outstanding chairmans loans as well, which if they remain with the club (and I am sure they will), values the club (as a Championship side) at somewhat over £50M......


Not sure I follow that.

5145 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 159 guests

It is currently 19 Nov 2024 00:08