pea None quite like RL for flogging a dead horse...
Does that mean she's into Flagellation, Necrophilia & Bestiality...?
by dogzbollox » 24 May 2012 16:23
pea None quite like RL for flogging a dead horse...
by dogzbollox » 24 May 2012 16:36
Super Kevin Bremner! So the deal is 6 weeks overdue! Big firkin wow! Hands up if you've ever bought a house......
by PieEater » 24 May 2012 16:42
by Gordons Cumming » 24 May 2012 17:20
by Mike Hunt » 24 May 2012 17:53
Gordons Cumming Maybe this delay is some cunning transfer ploy.......................
by It's the round thing » 24 May 2012 23:03
by Pseud O'Nym » 24 May 2012 23:29
It's the round thing Look at blackburn and the debacle with Venkys. If the PL taking time avoids a similar fate for RFC that is all to the good.
by Ian Royal » 24 May 2012 23:43
The RougeIan RoyalSchards#2
Well I do for one, as the questions of if and when this goes through will, presumably, have a direct impact on the budget we can put into the playing and when we can deploy it.
I don't really see why. We've been told we'll operate in the same way as we always have done, just with a bit more cash behind us. We've got a massive increase in income without the takeover, so expect the playing side to be run almost identically with or without the official word on TSI. At worst we'll have just built up some debt which we can cut our cloth to deal with over the next couple of years.
The only thing the deal is likely to affect is whether we can afford to spend as much next summer, and whether we can go ahead with top category academy and the stadium expansion amongst other infrastructure type things.
The club is clearly active in the transfer market, so I don't get what your beef could be... other than this is just an excuse to continue to complain bitterly about everything.
Are you mental? TSI came in and provided the club with the money required to pay Jason Roberts, pay Jimmy Kebe's inflated wages, get Connolly etc..
Without them we wouldn't have done that.
With this season, the club will set out a budget for the year and beyond. Without TSI it would/will be less. Nicky Hammond maintaining that it wont affect transfer dealings probably means he is either supremely confident at this stage that it will go through, or he thinks by the time we have made our priority signings we will know what, if anything, is left.
by Ian Royal » 24 May 2012 23:52
Royal Lady I'm hardly doomsaying or handwringing you twerp. I'm merely asking who we are to believe - because I was told by different sources and the same as others on here, that the deal was stalling - and that it was something to do with being able to show where the money was coming from. SJM said it would be finalised at the end of March. It wasn't. Then he kept saying "next week". Then people say, well it won't be done yet due to us not officially being a member of the PL. And others are still saying, it's being dealt with now and there are always delays. So for the final time, I'll ask, who are we meant to believe? SJM - who was obviously incorrect with his timings on a number of occasions, my sources, other people's sources or the people who reckon the PL aren't even looking at it yet? It's a right old muddle. That's been the only points I have made. If that's handwringing and doomsaying (whatever doomsaying is meant to be) then gawd help you lot if something ever goes terribly wrong at this club and I dare to offer an opinion on it!
by Royal Lady » 25 May 2012 06:47
by Terminal Boardom » 25 May 2012 07:08
PieEater I'm not too fussed about the lack of transfer activity, this is holiday time for most players and staff, they return in time for the end of their contract/start of a new one and then into pre season training.
by Simon's Church » 25 May 2012 07:09
by southbank1871 » 25 May 2012 07:09
by STAR Liaison » 25 May 2012 07:15
Ian Royal SJM believed that this wouldn't delay things significantly, so we get told should go through next week.
This was wrong as the PL's investigation is a lot more thorough.
The PL asked for more info and transparency. Mostly it seems to have been given. Another delay.
With the end of the PL season still going, it had other priorities and probably didn't light a fire under our takeover investigations.
by philM » 25 May 2012 07:16
Sebastian RL, you're a love and all that, but on the last few pages of this thread it feels like you're experiencing a break down.
by ZacNaloen » 25 May 2012 07:17
starliaisonIan Royal SJM believed that this wouldn't delay things significantly, so we get told should go through next week.
This was wrong as the PL's investigation is a lot more thorough.
The PL asked for more info and transparency. Mostly it seems to have been given. Another delay.
With the end of the PL season still going, it had other priorities and probably didn't light a fire under our takeover investigations.
From what I was told yesterday by someone involved the PL have been rather taken up with their television rights negotiations.
That said it still seems very positive and maybe next week!
by Schards#2 » 25 May 2012 07:34
Ian RoyalSchards#2Dare to Dr£am
All of your answers have been posted and reposted numerous times, like most of your questions!
The Premier League have been conducting the FAPPT. That goes ahead regardless of whether we are officially a Premier League club yet or not. The Premier League can complete all tests/checks any time they like, but when they choose to make their decision public is anyone's guess.
It's only speculation on here that the announcement will be delayed until we are 'officially' a Premier League club, so the decision may come sooner, or indeed it may come after. Who knows, and what's more, other than you who really cares? It will be done when it is done.
Well I do for one, as the questions of if and when this goes through will, presumably, have a direct impact on the budget we can put into the playing and when we can deploy it.
I don't really see why. We've been told we'll operate in the same way as we always have done, just with a bit more cash behind us. We've got a massive increase in income without the takeover, so expect the playing side to be run almost identically with or without the official word on TSI. At worst we'll have just built up some debt which we can cut our cloth to deal with over the next couple of years.
The only thing the deal is likely to affect is whether we can afford to spend as much next summer, and whether we can go ahead with top category academy and the stadium expansion amongst other infrastructure type things.
The club is clearly active in the transfer market, so I don't get what your beef could be... other than this is just an excuse to continue to complain bitterly about everything.
by Dare to Dr£am » 25 May 2012 07:37
starliaisonIan Royal SJM believed that this wouldn't delay things significantly, so we get told should go through next week.
This was wrong as the PL's investigation is a lot more thorough.
The PL asked for more info and transparency. Mostly it seems to have been given. Another delay.
With the end of the PL season still going, it had other priorities and probably didn't light a fire under our takeover investigations.
From what I was told yesterday by someone involved the PL have been rather taken up with their television rights negotiations.
That said it still seems very positive and maybe next week!
by Gordons Cumming » 25 May 2012 07:41
by The Rouge » 25 May 2012 07:43
Royal Lady "NO-ONE CAN DEFINITIVELY ANSWER" - thank you! So no-one knows for sure, yet people cream themselves over something they're told by a "reliable source". And YOU bang on like you're the bloody RFC oracle or something. Therefore, all the stick I and others have been given for what we have been told is completely unjustified, UNTIL such time as we know DEFINITIVELY what the hell is going on.
Users browsing this forum: Brum Royal, Hendo and 298 guests