by Extended-Phenotype » 04 Jul 2012 15:37
by Vision » 04 Jul 2012 15:44
by leeeroy Jeeenkins » 04 Jul 2012 15:45
by melonhead » 04 Jul 2012 15:47
by Reading4eva » 04 Jul 2012 15:50
by Extended-Phenotype » 04 Jul 2012 15:52
leeeroy Jeeenkins is the Y axis in seconds or what?
by pea » 04 Jul 2012 15:57
by Extended-Phenotype » 04 Jul 2012 15:59
by Reading4eva » 04 Jul 2012 16:01
Extended-Phenotypeleeeroy Jeeenkins is the Y axis in seconds or what?
Of course it's in seconds YOU STUPID FUKING WHORE
by leeeroy Jeeenkins » 04 Jul 2012 16:17
Reading4evaExtended-Phenotypeleeeroy Jeeenkins is the Y axis in seconds or what?
Of course it's in seconds YOU STUPID FUKING WHORE
Bit harsh
by ankeny » 04 Jul 2012 16:37
by Extended-Phenotype » 04 Jul 2012 16:40
by pea » 04 Jul 2012 17:12
Extended-Phenotype Quotemare.
by Extended-Phenotype » 04 Jul 2012 17:15
/quote][/quotepeaExtended-Phenotype Quotemare.[/quote
Agreed, not your finest moment ankeny/quote]
twat
by Ian Royal » 04 Jul 2012 18:27
Extended-Phenotype If it wasn't for Roberts, I'd say our signings and the demand of the prem have us lining up in a 4-5-1. Strong Mr. Pog up top, Guthrie as an AM with Jem and Legs behind him.
However, the rumour of Rhodes (i.e. how many attackers do we need if we are setting up for just 1 up top), and Roberts quality (and vocal opposition to lone striking) maybe we are going to take a risk and swap Jem for Guthrie in our starting line-up.
No idea what I'd prefer to happen. Roberts deserves a chance, but we desperately need some creativity in the middle. Can Reading and Guthrie cope with just two in central midfield?
by ZacNaloen » 04 Jul 2012 19:02
by Royal Ginger » 05 Jul 2012 08:23
by Extended-Phenotype » 05 Jul 2012 08:34
by Royal Ginger » 05 Jul 2012 08:46
by Extended-Phenotype » 05 Jul 2012 10:23
Users browsing this forum: Vision and 210 guests