by Hoop Blah »
03 Jul 2012 10:43
Friday's Legacy And there's the problem - I can't post an opinion without it being confused for something I've been told and chosen to pass on. I said right at the beginning of that thread that he had outgrown Reading. What division were we in at the time; did we expect to go up; weren't we then talking about a loan; did we even imagine this level of ambition from Anton Zingarevich? Don't confuse opinion with something I decided to pass on. I don't mind being criticised for getting something wrong etc, but most of my contributions on here are personal opinion. It really shouldn't be too hard to distinguish from the two.
To be fair, I'd say that problem you describe is just the outcome of the way you've gone about delivering your
ITK information and running around the board kind of showing it off, whilst also having numerous pops at Fordham for not running his mouth off at the first opportunity he gets.
As I've said before, the information that makes it out of the club to twitter and the internet is largely snippets of office gossip and a bit of working knowledge in some cases (those that really know first hand don't tend to leak it to general punters).
I get some info which I don't pass on because it's not ground breaking stuff and a lot of it's on here in various forms anyway. You do seem to have a pretty decent source on some things, but I would say you state everything you hear as fact, and chop down any other variations of those facts as wrong because it's not what you've heard (ie the Mariappa bid rejection which I'd heard was right when you were saying it was a club smokescreen - which is right I don't really know of course). Taking that tone is a double edged sword.