by Turns8 » 13 Jul 2012 15:59
by Big Foot » 13 Jul 2012 15:59
by HoneyRoastHoax » 13 Jul 2012 15:59
Tokyo Sex WhaleHoneyRoastHoax cypry did you read their 21 page rule book before attending?
http://star-reading.org/index.php/membership/
How many members does STAR have?
by winchester_royal » 13 Jul 2012 16:00
Wimb Beside from that you're utterly missing my point here. STAR have said they would have posted a summary of what was said at the event, they just haven't done it yet. My only point has ever been that it's a shame that someone in the room took it upon THEMSELVES to go and publish all the info
by bigmike » 13 Jul 2012 16:00
MaguireWimb Beside from that you're utterly missing my point here. STAR have said they would have posted a summary of what was said at the event, they just haven't done it yet. My only point has ever been that it's a shame that someone in the room took it upon THEMSELVES to go and publish all the info
Why wouldn't he? He's attended his first Fans Forum, found it interesting and passed a summary on to a (relatively small) group of other supporters. It's only a day later, no wonder he didn't wonder why there wasn't a thread.
by peterroyal76 » 13 Jul 2012 16:01
by Wimb » 13 Jul 2012 16:01
leicsRoyal Wimb, I really don't understand any of this.
Unless all of STARs members have to sign confidentiality agreements, how the hell do you stop it being posted in public forums. Yes STAR can fly about requesting posts are removed but there is nothing to stop anyone just reposting it in the same place or somewhere else.
Maguire Why wouldn't he? He's attended his first Fans Forum, found it interesting and passed a summary on to a (relatively small) group of other supporters. It's only a day later, no wonder he didn't wonder why there wasn't a thread.
by hobnob » 13 Jul 2012 16:03
by pea » 13 Jul 2012 16:05
hobnob FU all
by Turns8 » 13 Jul 2012 16:05
by Maguire » 13 Jul 2012 16:07
hobnob It was the club that asked for the post to be removed as the event, as per STAR’s instruction, is behind closed doors.
The original author of the summary had also asked for it to be removed anyway.
I do think that it's a fans forum so surely all fans are entitled to know what was said... and surely everyone will find out anyway as it's not like the people there aren't going to talk to other fans.
However, they are running a "private" event and don't want it reported on so you have to respect those wishes!
Funny thing is that STAR used to supply the script of previous fans forums to publish on this website.
by Wimb » 13 Jul 2012 16:07
Turns8 ...and despite the club requesting it as a 'behind closed doors' event...I'm pretty sure that nothing was said that would be harmful to the club in anyway...so the whole thing is abit of a farce really...
by Wimb » 13 Jul 2012 16:08
Maguirehobnob It was the club that asked for the post to be removed as the event, as per STAR’s instruction, is behind closed doors.
The original author of the summary had also asked for it to be removed anyway.
I do think that it's a fans forum so surely all fans are entitled to know what was said... and surely everyone will find out anyway as it's not like the people there aren't going to talk to other fans.
However, they are running a "private" event and don't want it reported on so you have to respect those wishes!
Funny thing is that STAR used to supply the script of previous fans forums to publish on this website.
Fair one HobNob.
In future perhaps an eagle-eyed moderator might be able to swoop on these things before it gets escalated to you
by HoneyRoastHoax » 13 Jul 2012 16:10
by Maguire » 13 Jul 2012 16:10
by southbank1871 » 13 Jul 2012 16:11
by Only one Trevor Morley » 13 Jul 2012 16:12
WimbTurns8 ...and despite the club requesting it as a 'behind closed doors' event...I'm pretty sure that nothing was said that would be harmful to the club in anyway...so the whole thing is abit of a farce really...
Agreed, it's a bit frustrating all around.
Needless to say lessons would have been learned. Hopefully what can happen in future is a fans forum where an edited transcript can be made available a day or two after.
Won't really continue to throw posts into this because it's taken up most of the afternoon and I have no real beef with anyone. Apologies to Cypry if he felt I was OTT.
by Only one Trevor Morley » 13 Jul 2012 16:14
southbank1871 It's nice that hobnob agrees with us but it sounds like he was put under tremendous pressure from the club to delete the thread. Dear oh dear. Like others have said, if Cypry had reported on anything remotely controversial or revealing, then I could understand it, but he didn't.
by Wimb » 13 Jul 2012 16:15
Only one Trevor MorleyWimbTurns8 ...and despite the club requesting it as a 'behind closed doors' event...I'm pretty sure that nothing was said that would be harmful to the club in anyway...so the whole thing is abit of a farce really...
Agreed, it's a bit frustrating all around.
Needless to say lessons would have been learned. Hopefully what can happen in future is a fans forum where an edited transcript can be made available a day or two after.
Won't really continue to throw posts into this because it's taken up most of the afternoon and I have no real beef with anyone. Apologies to Cypry if he felt I was OTT.
a welcome climbdown - applying the logic of your earlier posts of not reporting anything that hasnt already appeared; can I perhaps suggest that a similar approach is taken to slightly dull player profile blogs on other fan websites
by winchester_royal » 13 Jul 2012 16:16
southbank1871 It's nice that hobnob agrees with us but it sounds like he was put under tremendous pressure from the club to delete the thread. Dear oh dear. Like others have said, if Cypry had reported on anything remotely controversial or revealing, then I could understand it, but he didn't.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 39 guests